Annear Michael J, Toye Christine, McInerney Frances, Eccleston Claire, Tranter Bruce, Elliott Kate-Ellen, Robinson Andrew
Wicking Dementia Research and Education Centre, University of Tasmania, Medical Sciences 1, 17 Liverpool St, Hobart, 7000, Australia.
School of Nursing & Midwifery, Curtin University, Western Australia, GPO BOX U1987, Perth, WA, 6845, Australia.
BMC Geriatr. 2015 Feb 6;15:5. doi: 10.1186/s12877-015-0008-1.
Escalating numbers of people are experiencing dementia in many countries. With increasing consumer needs, there is anticipated growth in the numbers of people providing diagnostic evaluations, treatments, and care. Ensuring a consistent and contemporary understanding of dementia across all of these groups has become a critical issue. This study aimed to reach consensus among dementia experts from English speaking countries regarding essential and contemporary knowledge about dementia.
An online Delphi study was conducted to examine expert opinion concerning dementia knowledge with three rounds of data collection. A sample of dementia experts was selected by a panel of Australian experts, including a geriatrician and three professors of aged care. Purposive selection was initially undertaken with the sample expanded through snowballing. Dementia experts (N = 19) included geriatricians, psychologists, psychiatrists, neuroscientists, dementia advocates, and nurse academics from the United Kingdom, United States, and Australia. In the first round, these participants provided open-ended responses to questions determining what comprised essential knowledge about dementia. In the second round, responses were summarised into 66 discrete statements that participants rated on the basis of importance. In the third round, a rank-ordered list of the 66 statements and a group median were provided and participants rated the statements again. The degree of consensus regarding importance ratings was determined by assessing median, interquartile range, and proportion of experts scoring above predetermined thresholds. Correlation scores were calculated for each statement after the final round to identify changes in statement scores.
The Delphi experts identified 36 statements about dementia that they considered essential to understanding the condition. Statements about care for a person experiencing dementia and their care giver represented the largest response category. Other statements, for which full or very high consensus was reached, related to dementia characteristics, symptoms and progression, diagnosis and assessment, and treatment and prevention.
These results summarise knowledge of dementia that is considered essential across expert representatives of key stakeholder groups from three countries. This information has implications for the delivery of care to people with the condition and the development of dementia education programs.
在许多国家,患痴呆症的人数不断增加。随着消费者需求的增长,提供诊断评估、治疗和护理的人数预计也会增加。确保所有这些群体对痴呆症有一致且与时俱进的理解已成为一个关键问题。本研究旨在使来自英语国家的痴呆症专家就痴呆症的基本知识和最新知识达成共识。
开展了一项在线德尔菲研究,通过三轮数据收集来调查专家对痴呆症知识的看法。由包括一名老年病医生和三名老年护理教授在内的澳大利亚专家小组挑选了一组痴呆症专家。最初进行了有目的的抽样,并通过滚雪球的方式扩大样本。痴呆症专家(N = 19)包括来自英国、美国和澳大利亚的老年病医生、心理学家、精神科医生、神经科学家、痴呆症倡导者和护士学者。在第一轮中,这些参与者对确定痴呆症基本知识的问题提供了开放式回答。在第二轮中,回答被总结为66条离散陈述,参与者根据重要性对其进行评分。在第三轮中,提供了66条陈述的排序列表和组中位数,参与者再次对这些陈述进行评分。通过评估中位数、四分位距以及得分高于预定阈值的专家比例来确定重要性评分的共识程度。在最后一轮之后,计算每条陈述的相关分数以确定陈述分数的变化。
德尔菲专家确定了36条关于痴呆症的陈述,他们认为这些陈述对于理解该病症至关重要。关于痴呆症患者及其护理者护理的陈述是最大的回应类别。其他达成完全或非常高共识的陈述涉及痴呆症的特征、症状和进展、诊断和评估以及治疗和预防。
这些结果总结了来自三个国家关键利益相关者群体的专家代表所认为的痴呆症基本知识。这些信息对为患有该病症的人提供护理以及痴呆症教育项目的开展具有启示意义。