Saavedra Sandra L, Woollacott Marjorie H
Department of Human Physiology and Institute of Neuroscience, University of Oregon, Eugene, OR.
Department of Human Physiology and Institute of Neuroscience, University of Oregon, Eugene, OR.
Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2015 Jun;96(6):1088-97. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2015.01.016. Epub 2015 Feb 2.
To examine postural constraints in children with moderate-to-severe cerebral palsy (CP) using a segmental approach.
Quasi-experimental repeated-measures study; case series.
Motor control research laboratory.
Children (N=15; age range, 4-16y) with moderate (Gross Motor Function Classification System [GMFCS] IV; n=8; 4 boys) or severe (GMFCS V) (n=7; 4 boys) CP.
Each child participated in 3 data collection sessions. During each session, we evaluated postural control for sitting using kinematics and clinical assessments.
Kinematic data were used to document head alignment and stabilization with external support at 4 levels (axillae, midrib, waist, hip). Two clinical assessments, the Segmental Assessment of Trunk Control and behavioral assessment for stage of trunk control, were also used to compare results for children with CP to previous longitudinal data from typically developing (TD) infants (3-9mo of age).
Children with GMFCS V had difficulty aligning and stabilizing their head along the medial-lateral and anterior-posterior axes. External support improved postural control for children with GMFCS V but not for those classified as GMFCS IV, who had opposite responses to support compared with TD infants.
Children with GMFCS V have limited trunk control but respond to support similarly to young TD infants, suggesting delayed postural control. Response to external support for children with GMFCS IV suggests a unique strategy for trunk control not observed in typical infants. Overall a segmental approach offers new insights into development of trunk control in children with moderate-to-severe CP.
采用节段性方法研究中重度脑瘫(CP)患儿的姿势限制。
准实验性重复测量研究;病例系列。
运动控制研究实验室。
15名中重度CP患儿(年龄范围4 - 16岁),其中中度(粗大运动功能分类系统[GMFCS]IV级;n = 8;4名男孩)或重度(GMFCS V级)(n = 7;4名男孩)。
每个孩子参加3次数据收集 session。在每次session期间,我们使用运动学和临床评估来评估坐姿的姿势控制。
运动学数据用于记录在4个水平(腋窝、中肋骨、腰部、臀部)有外部支撑时头部的对线和稳定情况。还使用两项临床评估,即躯干控制节段性评估和躯干控制阶段行为评估,将CP患儿的结果与先前来自正常发育(TD)婴儿(3 - 9个月龄)的纵向数据进行比较。
GMFCS V级患儿在内外侧和前后轴向上难以对齐和稳定头部。外部支撑改善了GMFCS V级患儿的姿势控制,但对GMFCS IV级患儿无效,与TD婴儿相比,GMFCS IV级患儿对支撑的反应相反。
GMFCS V级患儿的躯干控制有限,但对支撑的反应与TD幼儿相似,提示姿势控制延迟。GMFCS IV级患儿对外部支撑的反应提示了一种在典型婴儿中未观察到的独特躯干控制策略。总体而言,节段性方法为中重度CP患儿躯干控制的发展提供了新的见解。