Booker Sam A, Pires Nuno, Cobb Stuart, Soares-da-Silva Patrício, Vida Imre
School of Life Sciences, College of Medical, Veterinary and Life Sciences, University Avenue, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, G12 8QQ, UK.
Department of Research and Development, BIAL-Portela & Cª, S.A., S. Mamede do Coronado, Portugal.
Neuropharmacology. 2015 Jun;93:103-15. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropharm.2015.01.019. Epub 2015 Feb 3.
This study assessed the anticonvulsant and seizure generation effects of carbamazepine (CBZ), oxcarbazepine (OXC) and eslicarbazepine (S-Lic) in wild-type mice. Electrophysiological recordings were made to discriminate potential cellular and synaptic mechanisms underlying anti- and pro-epileptic actions. The anticonvulsant and pro-convulsant effects were evaluated in the MES, the 6-Hz and the Irwin tests. Whole-cell patch-clamp recordings were used to investigate the effects on fast excitatory and inhibitory synaptic transmission in hippocampal area CA1. The safety window for CBZ, OXC and eslicarbazepine (ED50 value against the MES test and the dose that produces grade 5 convulsions in all mice), was 6.3, 6.0 and 12.5, respectively. At high concentrations the three drugs reduced synaptic transmission. CBZ and OXC enhanced excitatory postsynaptic currents (EPSCs) at low, therapeutically-relevant concentrations. These effects were associated with no change in inhibitory postsynaptic currents (IPSCs) resulting in altered balance between excitation and inhibition. S-Lic had no effect on EPSC or IPSC amplitudes over the same concentration range. The CBZ mediated enhancement of EPSCs was blocked by DPCPX, a selective antagonist, and occluded by CCPA, a selective agonist of the adenosine A1 receptor. Furthermore, reduction of endogenous adenosine by application of the enzyme adenosine deaminase also abolished the CBZ- and OXC-induced increase of EPSCs, indicating that the two drugs act as antagonists at native adenosine receptors. In conclusion, CBZ and OXC possess pro-epileptic actions at clinically-relevant concentrations through the enhancement of excitatory synaptic transmission. S-Lic by comparison has no such effect on synaptic transmission, explaining its lack of seizure exacerbation.
本研究评估了卡马西平(CBZ)、奥卡西平(OXC)和依斯利卡西平(S-Lic)在野生型小鼠中的抗惊厥和致痫作用。进行电生理记录以区分抗癫痫和促癫痫作用潜在的细胞和突触机制。在最大电休克(MES)、6赫兹和欧文试验中评估抗惊厥和促惊厥作用。采用全细胞膜片钳记录来研究对海马CA1区快速兴奋性和抑制性突触传递的影响。CBZ、OXC和依斯利卡西平的安全窗(针对MES试验的半数有效量值以及在所有小鼠中产生5级惊厥的剂量)分别为6.3、6.0和12.5。在高浓度时,这三种药物会降低突触传递。CBZ和OXC在低的、与治疗相关的浓度下增强兴奋性突触后电流(EPSC)。这些作用与抑制性突触后电流(IPSC)无变化相关,导致兴奋与抑制之间的平衡改变。在相同浓度范围内,S-Lic对EPSC或IPSC幅度无影响。CBZ介导的EPSC增强被选择性拮抗剂二丙基环磷腺苷(DPCPX)阻断,并被腺苷A1受体的选择性激动剂CCPA所遮蔽。此外,应用腺苷脱氨酶降低内源性腺苷也消除了CBZ和OXC诱导的EPSC增加,表明这两种药物在天然腺苷受体处作为拮抗剂起作用。总之,CBZ和OXC在临床相关浓度下通过增强兴奋性突触传递具有促癫痫作用。相比之下,S-Lic对突触传递没有这种作用,这解释了其缺乏癫痫发作加剧的现象。