Suppr超能文献

降压治疗对不同类型急性缺血性脑卒中的影响。

Effects of blood pressure-lowering treatment in different subtypes of acute ischemic stroke.

机构信息

From the Department of Neurology (E.C.S., M.J.), Department of Haematology (P.M.S.), and Department of Internal Medicine (E.B.), Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway; Institute of Clinical Medicine, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway (P.M.S.); and Stroke Trials Unit, Division of Clinical Neuroscience, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, United Kingdom (P.M.W.B.).

出版信息

Stroke. 2015 Mar;46(3):877-9. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.114.008512. Epub 2015 Feb 5.

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

The Scandinavian Candesartan Acute Stroke Trial (SCAST) found no benefits of blood pressure-lowering treatment with candesartan in acute stroke. We have investigated whether the effect of treatment is different in different subtypes of ischemic stroke.

METHODS

SCAST was a randomized- and placebo-controlled trial of candesartan in 2029 patients presenting within 30 hours of ischemic or hemorrhagic stroke and systolic blood pressure ≥140 mm Hg. Ischemic stroke subtype was categorized by the Oxfordshire Community Stroke Project classification. There were 2 primary effect variables: the composite vascular end point of vascular death, myocardial infarction, or stroke during the first 6 months and functional outcome at 6 months.

RESULTS

A total of 1733 patients with ischemic stroke were included: total anterior circulation infarcts in 129, partial anterior in 850, posterior in 236, and lacunar in 510 patients. For functional outcome there was a significant trend toward a better effect of candesartan in patients with larger infarcts (total anterior circulation or partial anterior circulation) than in patients with smaller infarcts (lacunar infarction; P=0.02). For the composite vascular end point, there were no differences in treatment effect.

CONCLUSIONS

The results suggest that the effect of blood pressure-lowering treatment with candesartan may differ according to different types of acute ischemic stroke, but this needs to be confirmed in future trials.

CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION URL

http://www.clinicaltrials.gov. Unique identifier: NCT00120003.

摘要

背景与目的

斯堪的纳维亚坎地沙坦急性脑卒中试验(SCAST)发现降压治疗坎地沙坦对急性脑卒中无益处。我们研究了降压治疗对不同类型缺血性脑卒中的疗效是否不同。

方法

SCAST 是一项坎地沙坦治疗发病 30 小时内伴收缩压≥140mmHg 的缺血性或出血性脑卒中患者的随机、安慰剂对照试验。采用牛津社区脑卒中项目分类法对缺血性脑卒中亚型进行分类。主要疗效变量有 2 个:前 6 个月内血管死亡、心肌梗死或脑卒中的复合血管终点,以及 6 个月时的功能结局。

结果

共纳入 1733 例缺血性脑卒中患者:全前循环梗死 129 例,部分前循环梗死 850 例,后循环梗死 236 例,腔隙性梗死 510 例。就功能结局而言,坎地沙坦对大梗死(全前循环或部分前循环)患者的疗效明显优于小梗死(腔隙性梗死)患者(P=0.02),存在显著的趋势。对于复合血管终点,治疗效果无差异。

结论

结果提示,降压治疗坎地沙坦的效果可能因不同类型的急性缺血性脑卒中而不同,但这需要在未来的试验中得到证实。

临床试验注册网址

http://www.clinicaltrials.gov。唯一标识符:NCT00120003。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验