Abouelmagd Sara A, Sun Bo, Chang Alice C, Ku Youn Jin, Yeo Yoon
Department of Industrial and Physical Pharmacy and ‡Weldon School of Biomedical Engineering, Purdue University , West Lafayette, Indiana 47907, United States.
Mol Pharm. 2015 Mar 2;12(3):997-1003. doi: 10.1021/mp500817h. Epub 2015 Feb 17.
In vitro drug release kinetics studies are routinely performed to examine the ability of new drug formulations to modulate drug release. The underlying assumption is that the studies are performed in a sufficiently dilute solution, where the drug release is not limited by the solubility and the difference in release kinetics profile reflects the performance of a drug carrier in vivo. This condition is, however, difficult to meet with poorly water-soluble drug formulations, as it requires a very large volume of release medium relative to the formulation mass, which makes it challenging to measure the drug concentration accurately. These difficulties are aggravated with nanoparticle (NP) formulations, which are hard to separate from the release medium and thus require a dialysis bag or repeated high-speed centrifugation for sampling. Perhaps for these reasons, drug release kinetics studies of NPs of poorly water-soluble drugs are often performed in suboptimal conditions in which the NPs are not sufficiently diluted. However, such a practice can potentially underestimate drug release from NPs, leading to an inaccurate prediction that the NPs will attenuate the drug activity in vivo. Here we perform release kinetics studies of two different NP formulations of paclitaxel, a representative poorly water-soluble drug, according to common practices in the literature. We find that the drug release from NPs can be substantially underestimated depending on the choice of the release medium, NP/medium ratio, and handling of release samples. We discuss potential consequences of underestimating drug release, ending with suggestions for future studies with NP formulations of poorly water-soluble drugs.
体外药物释放动力学研究通常用于考察新药物制剂调节药物释放的能力。其潜在假设是,这些研究是在足够稀释的溶液中进行的,其中药物释放不受溶解度限制,且释放动力学曲线的差异反映了药物载体在体内的性能。然而,对于难溶性药物制剂而言,这种条件很难满足,因为相对于制剂质量,它需要非常大量的释放介质,这使得准确测量药物浓度具有挑战性。纳米颗粒(NP)制剂会加剧这些困难,因为它们很难从释放介质中分离出来,因此需要透析袋或反复高速离心来取样。也许正是由于这些原因,难溶性药物纳米颗粒的药物释放动力学研究通常在次优条件下进行,即纳米颗粒没有得到充分稀释。然而,这种做法可能会低估纳米颗粒的药物释放,导致对纳米颗粒会在体内减弱药物活性的预测不准确。在这里,我们根据文献中的常见做法,对代表性难溶性药物紫杉醇的两种不同纳米颗粒制剂进行了释放动力学研究。我们发现,根据释放介质的选择、纳米颗粒/介质比例以及释放样品的处理方式,纳米颗粒的药物释放可能会被大幅低估。我们讨论了低估药物释放的潜在后果,并针对未来难溶性药物纳米颗粒制剂的研究提出了建议。