Aoun Salah G, El Ahmadieh Tarek Y, El Tecle Najib E, Daou Marc R, Adel Joseph G, Park Christine S, Batjer H Hunt, Bendok Bernard R
Department of Neurological Surgery, University of Texas Southwestern, Dallas, Texas; and
Departments of 2 Neurological Surgery.
J Neurosurg. 2015 Jul;123(1):103-9. doi: 10.3171/2014.12.JNS131814. Epub 2015 Feb 6.
Microsurgical skills remain an integral component of neurosurgical education. There is a need for an objective scale to assess microsurgical skills. The objective of this study was to assess the face and construct validity of a bench training microanastomosis module and an objective assessment scale, i.e., the Northwestern Objective Microanastomosis Assessment Tool (NOMAT).
Medical students, neurosurgical residents, and postdoctoral research fellows at Northwestern University were enrolled in the study. Trainees were divided into 3 groups based on microsurgical experience: 1) experienced, 2) exposed, and 3) novices. Each trainee completed two end-to-end microanastomoses using a 1-mm and a 3-mm synthetic vessel. Two cameras were installed to capture procedural footage. One neurosurgeon blindly graded the performance of trainees using both objective and subjective methods to assess construct validity. Two neurosurgeons reviewed the contents of the simulation module to assess face validity.
Twenty-one trainees participated in the study, including 6 experienced, 6 exposed, and 9 novices. The mean NOMAT score for experienced trainees on the 1-mm module was 47.3/70 compared with 26.0/70 and 25.8/70 for exposed and novice trainees, respectively (p = 0.02). Using subjective grading, experienced trainees performed significantly better on the 1-mm module (64.2/100) compared with exposed or novice trainees (23.3/100 and 25.0/100, respectively; p = 0.02). No statistical difference between groups was noted for the 3-mm module with both NOMAT and subjective grading. Experienced trainees took less time to perform both tasks compared with the others.
Face and construct validities of the microanastomosis module were established. The scale and the microanastomosis module could help assess the microsurgical skills of neurosurgical trainees and serve as a basis for the creation of a microsurgical curriculum.
显微外科技能仍然是神经外科教育不可或缺的组成部分。需要一种客观的量表来评估显微外科技能。本研究的目的是评估一个实验台训练显微吻合模块和一个客观评估量表,即西北大学客观显微吻合评估工具(NOMAT)的表面效度和结构效度。
西北大学的医学生、神经外科住院医师和博士后研究员参与了本研究。根据显微外科经验将受训者分为3组:1)有经验者,2)有接触者,3)新手。每位受训者使用1毫米和3毫米的合成血管完成两次端对端显微吻合。安装了两台摄像机以拍摄操作过程的视频。一名神经外科医生采用客观和主观方法对受训者的表现进行盲评,以评估结构效度。两名神经外科医生审查了模拟模块的内容以评估表面效度。
21名受训者参与了本研究,包括6名有经验者、6名有接触者和9名新手。在1毫米模块上,有经验的受训者的NOMAT平均得分为47.3/70,而有接触者和新手受训者分别为26.0/70和25.8/70(p = 0.02)。采用主观评分时,在1毫米模块上,有经验的受训者(64.2/100)的表现明显优于有接触者或新手受训者(分别为23.3/100和25.0/100;p = 0.02)。对于3毫米模块,NOMAT评分和主观评分在各组之间均未发现统计学差异。与其他人相比,有经验的受训者完成两项任务的时间更短。
确立了显微吻合模块的表面效度和结构效度。该量表和显微吻合模块有助于评估神经外科受训者的显微外科技能,并可为创建显微外科课程提供依据。