Sevel Landrew S, O'Shea Andrew M, Letzen Janelle E, Craggs Jason G, Price Donald D, Robinson Michael E
Department of Clinical & Health Psychology, College of Public Health and Health Professions, University of Florida, P.O. Box 100165, Gainesville, FL 32610-0165, USA.
Department of Physical Therapy, School of Health Professions, University of Missouri, Columbia, 801 Clark Hall, MO 65211-4250, USA.
Neuroimage. 2015 Apr 15;110:87-94. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2015.01.056. Epub 2015 Feb 3.
A better understanding of the neural mechanisms underlying pain processing and analgesia may aid in the development and personalization of effective treatments for chronic pain. Clarification of the neural predictors of individual variability in placebo analgesia (PA) could aid in this process. The present study examined whether the strength of effective connectivity (EC) among pain-related brain regions could predict future placebo analgesic response in healthy individuals. In Visit 1, fMRI data were collected from 24 healthy subjects (13 females, mean age=22.56, SD=2.94) while experiencing painful thermal stimuli. During Visit 2, subjects were conditioned to expect less pain via a surreptitiously lowered temperature applied at two of the four sites on their feet. They were subsequently scanned again using the Visit 1 (painful) temperature. Subjects used an electronic VAS to rate their pain following each stimulus. Differences in ratings at conditioned and unconditioned sites were used to measure placebo response (PA scores). Dynamic causal modeling was used to estimate the EC among a set of brain regions related to pain processing at Visit 1 (periaqueductal gray, thalamus, rostral anterior cingulate cortex, dorsolateral prefrontal cortex). Individual PA scores from Visit 2 were regressed on salient EC parameter estimates from Visit 1. Results indicate that both greater left hemisphere modulatory DLPFC➔PAG connectivity and right hemisphere, endogenous thalamus➔DLPFC connectivity were significantly predictive of future placebo response (R(2)=0.82). To our knowledge, this is the first study to identify the value of EC in understanding individual differences in PA, and may suggest the potential modifiability of endogenous pain modulation.
更好地理解疼痛处理和镇痛背后的神经机制,可能有助于开发有效的慢性疼痛治疗方法并实现个性化治疗。阐明安慰剂镇痛(PA)中个体差异的神经预测因素有助于这一过程。本研究探讨了疼痛相关脑区之间有效连接(EC)的强度是否能够预测健康个体未来的安慰剂镇痛反应。在第一次访视中,从24名健康受试者(13名女性,平均年龄=22.56,标准差=2.94)身上收集功能磁共振成像(fMRI)数据,同时让他们感受疼痛的热刺激。在第二次访视中,通过在受试者脚部四个部位中的两个部位悄悄降低温度,使他们形成疼痛减轻的预期。随后,使用第一次访视(疼痛)时的温度再次对他们进行扫描。受试者在每次刺激后使用电子视觉模拟评分法(VAS)对疼痛进行评分。条件性和非条件性部位评分的差异用于测量安慰剂反应(PA评分)。动态因果模型用于估计第一次访视时与疼痛处理相关的一组脑区(导水管周围灰质、丘脑、喙前扣带回皮质、背外侧前额叶皮质)之间的EC。将第二次访视的个体PA评分与第一次访视的显著EC参数估计值进行回归分析。结果表明,左半球更大的调节性背外侧前额叶皮质➔导水管周围灰质连接以及右半球内源性丘脑➔背外侧前额叶皮质连接均能显著预测未来的安慰剂反应(R(2)=0.82)。据我们所知,这是第一项确定EC在理解PA个体差异中的价值的研究,可能提示内源性疼痛调节的潜在可修饰性。