• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

从美国视角对替格瑞洛治疗的经济学分析:来自 PLATO 研究的结果。

Economic analysis of ticagrelor therapy from a U.S. perspective: results from the PLATO study.

机构信息

Duke Clinical Research Institute, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina.

Duke Clinical Research Institute, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina.

出版信息

J Am Coll Cardiol. 2015 Feb 10;65(5):465-76. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2014.11.034.

DOI:10.1016/j.jacc.2014.11.034
PMID:25660925
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Based on results of the PLATO (Platelet Inhibition and Patient Outcomes) trial comparing ticagrelor with clopidogrel therapy, the U.S. Food and Drug Administration approved ticagrelor in 2011 for reducing thrombotic cardiovascular events in patients with acute coronary syndrome (ACS) with the proviso that it be taken with low-dose aspirin.

OBJECTIVES

This study sought to assess the cost and cost effectiveness of ticagrelor therapy relative to clopidogrel in treating ACS patients from the perspective of the U.S. health care system.

METHODS

We estimated within-trial resource use and costs using U.S. low-dose aspirin patients in PLATO (n = 547). Quality-adjusted life expectancy was estimated using the total PLATO population (n = 18,624), combined with baseline risk and long-term survival data from an external ACS patient cohort. Study drugs were valued at current costs. Cost effectiveness was assessed, as was the sensitivity of results to sampling and methodological uncertainties.

RESULTS

One year of ticagrelor therapy, relative to that of generic clopidogrel, cost $29,665/quality-adjusted life-year gained, with 99% of bootstrap estimates falling under a $100,000 willingness-to-pay threshold. Results were robust to extensive sensitivity analyses, including variations in clopidogrel cost, exclusion of costs in extended years of life, and a recalibrated estimate of survival reflecting a lower underlying mortality risk in the United States.

CONCLUSIONS

For PLATO-eligible ACS patients, a U.S. perspective comparison of the current standard of dual antiplatelet therapy of aspirin with clopidogrel versus aspirin plus ticagrelor showed that the ticagrelor regimen increased life expectancy at an incremental cost well within accepted benchmarks of good value for money. (A Comparison of Ticagrelor [AZD6140] and Clopidogrel in Patients With Acute Coronary Syndrome [PLATO]; NCT00391872).

摘要

背景

基于 PLATO(血小板抑制和患者预后)试验比较替格瑞洛与氯吡格雷治疗的结果,美国食品和药物管理局于 2011 年批准替格瑞洛用于减少急性冠脉综合征(ACS)患者的血栓心血管事件,前提是与低剂量阿司匹林一起使用。

目的

本研究旨在从美国医疗保健系统的角度评估替格瑞洛治疗 ACS 患者的成本和成本效益相对于氯吡格雷。

方法

我们使用 PLATO 中的美国低剂量阿司匹林患者(n = 547)估算了试验内的资源利用和成本。使用来自外部 ACS 患者队列的基线风险和长期生存数据,结合 PLATO 总人群(n = 18624)估算了质量调整后的预期寿命。研究药物按当前成本计价。评估了成本效益,以及结果对抽样和方法学不确定性的敏感性。

结果

与通用氯吡格雷相比,替格瑞洛治疗一年的成本为 29665 美元/质量调整生命年,99%的 bootstrap 估计值低于 100000 美元的支付意愿阈值。结果对广泛的敏感性分析具有稳健性,包括氯吡格雷成本的变化、延长生命年限的成本排除以及反映美国基础死亡率较低的生存估计的重新校准。

结论

对于 PLATO 合格的 ACS 患者,从美国角度对当前双重抗血小板治疗标准(阿司匹林加氯吡格雷)与阿司匹林加替格瑞洛进行比较,结果表明替格瑞洛方案以可接受的物有所值基准内的增量成本增加了预期寿命。(替格瑞洛[AZD6140]与氯吡格雷在急性冠脉综合征患者中的比较[PLATO];NCT00391872)。

相似文献

1
Economic analysis of ticagrelor therapy from a U.S. perspective: results from the PLATO study.从美国视角对替格瑞洛治疗的经济学分析:来自 PLATO 研究的结果。
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2015 Feb 10;65(5):465-76. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2014.11.034.
2
Cost-effectiveness of 12-month treatment with ticagrelor compared with clopidogrel in the management of acute coronary syndromes.替格瑞洛与氯吡格雷治疗急性冠脉综合征 12 个月的成本效果比较。
Clin Ther. 2013 Aug;35(8):1110-1117.e9. doi: 10.1016/j.clinthera.2013.06.015. Epub 2013 Jul 26.
3
Cost-effectiveness of universal and platelet reactivity assay-driven antiplatelet therapy in acute coronary syndrome.急性冠脉综合征中抗血小板治疗的成本效益:普遍性和血小板反应性检测指导下的抗血小板治疗。
Am J Cardiol. 2013 Aug 1;112(3):355-62. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2013.03.036. Epub 2013 Apr 27.
4
Direct healthcare costs and cost-effectiveness of acute coronary syndrome secondary prevention with ticagrelor compared to clopidogrel: economic evaluation from the public payer's perspective in Poland based on the PLATO trial results.与氯吡格雷相比,替格瑞洛用于急性冠状动脉综合征二级预防的直接医疗成本及成本效益:基于PLATO试验结果,从波兰公共支付方角度进行的经济学评估
Kardiol Pol. 2014;72(9):823-30. doi: 10.5603/KP.a2014.0106. Epub 2014 May 20.
5
Lifetime cost-effectiveness analysis of ticagrelor in patients with acute coronary syndromes based on the PLATO trial: a Singapore healthcare perspective.基于 PLATO 试验的急性冠状动脉综合征患者替格瑞洛的终生成本效益分析:新加坡医疗保健视角。
Singapore Med J. 2013 Mar;54(3):169-75. doi: 10.11622/smedj.2013045.
6
Cost-effectiveness of ticagrelor and generic clopidogrel in patients with acute coronary syndrome in Switzerland.瑞士急性冠脉综合征患者使用替格瑞洛和仿制药氯吡格雷的成本效益分析。
Swiss Med Wkly. 2013 Sep 19;143:w13851. doi: 10.4414/smw.2013.13851. eCollection 2013.
7
Cost-effectiveness analysis of ticagrelor compared to clopidogrel for the treatment of patients with acute coronary syndrome in Colombia.替格瑞洛与氯吡格雷用于治疗哥伦比亚急性冠状动脉综合征患者的成本效益分析
Biomedica. 2015 Oct-Dec;35(4):531-40. doi: 10.7705/biomedica.v35i4.2620.
8
Health economic analysis of ticagrelor in patients with acute coronary syndromes intended for non-invasive therapy.替格瑞洛用于拟行非侵入性治疗的急性冠脉综合征患者的卫生经济学分析。
Heart. 2015 Jan;101(2):119-25. doi: 10.1136/heartjnl-2014-305864. Epub 2014 Sep 16.
9
[Budget impact analysis of antiplatelet therapy with ticagrelor and clopidogrel in patients with acute coronary syndrome after coronary artery bypass surgery].[替格瑞洛与氯吡格雷用于冠状动脉搭桥术后急性冠状动脉综合征患者抗血小板治疗的预算影响分析]
Ter Arkh. 2016;88(9):39-49. doi: 10.17116/terarkh201688939-49.
10
[Long-term cost-effectiveness of ticagrelor versus clopidogrel in acute coronary syndrome in Spain].[替格瑞洛与氯吡格雷在西班牙急性冠状动脉综合征中的长期成本效益分析]
Farm Hosp. 2014 Jul 1;38(4):266-75. doi: 10.7399/fh.2014.38.4.1132.

引用本文的文献

1
Clopidogrel therapy in acute coronary syndrome: Contemporary issues.急性冠状动脉综合征中的氯吡格雷治疗:当代问题
Indian Heart J. 2025 Jul-Aug;77(4):311-317. doi: 10.1016/j.ihj.2025.02.002. Epub 2025 Feb 5.
2
Cost-Effectiveness Comparison between Ticagrelor and Clopidogrel in Acute Coronary Syndrome in Iran.替格瑞洛与氯吡格雷在伊朗急性冠脉综合征中的成本效益比较
J Tehran Heart Cent. 2023 Apr;18(2):94-101. doi: 10.18502/jthc.v18i2.13318.
3
Hospital-Level Variation in Ticagrelor Use in Patients With Acute Coronary Syndrome.急性冠状动脉综合征患者中替格瑞洛的使用在医院间的差异。
J Am Heart Assoc. 2022 Jul 5;11(13):e024835. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.121.024835. Epub 2022 Jun 29.
4
Cost-effectiveness of CYP2C19-guided P2Y12 inhibitors in Veterans undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention for acute coronary syndromes.CYP2C19 指导的 P2Y12 抑制剂在接受经皮冠状动脉介入治疗急性冠脉综合征的退伍军人中的成本效益。
Eur Heart J Qual Care Clin Outcomes. 2023 Apr 26;9(3):249-257. doi: 10.1093/ehjqcco/qcac031.
5
The trial to assess chelation therapy 2 (TACT2): Rationale and design.评估螯合疗法 2 期临床试验(TACT2):研究原理和设计。
Am Heart J. 2022 Oct;252:1-11. doi: 10.1016/j.ahj.2022.05.013. Epub 2022 May 19.
6
Antiplatelet agents for chronic kidney disease.抗血小板药物在慢性肾脏病中的应用。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Feb 28;2(2):CD008834. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD008834.pub4.
7
Ticagrelor Use in Stroke Patients: Past, Present, and Future.替格瑞洛在脑卒中患者中的应用:过去、现在和未来。
Vasc Health Risk Manag. 2021 Jun 15;17:357-362. doi: 10.2147/VHRM.S266968. eCollection 2021.
8
Ticagrelor-induced Diarrhea in a Patient with Acute Coronary Syndrome Requiring Percutaneous Coronary Artery Intervention.替格瑞洛致一名需要经皮冠状动脉介入治疗的急性冠脉综合征患者腹泻
Cureus. 2019 Jan 12;11(1):e3874. doi: 10.7759/cureus.3874.
9
Contemporary Prescription Patterns of Adenosine Diphosphate Receptor Inhibitors in Acute Coronary Syndrome.急性冠状动脉综合征中腺苷二磷酸受体抑制剂的当代处方模式
P T. 2018 Nov;43(11):667-674.
10
Comparative Review of Oral P2Y Inhibitors.口服P2Y抑制剂的比较综述
P T. 2018 Jun;43(6):352-357.