• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

急性冠状动脉综合征中腺苷二磷酸受体抑制剂的当代处方模式

Contemporary Prescription Patterns of Adenosine Diphosphate Receptor Inhibitors in Acute Coronary Syndrome.

作者信息

Yin Ellen B, Nguyen Huy, Kamat Ishan, Bayat Maryam, Alam Mahboob

出版信息

P T. 2018 Nov;43(11):667-674.

PMID:30410282
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6205126/
Abstract

PURPOSE

To assess the contemporary use of adenosine diphosphate (ADP) receptor inhibitors in acute coronary syndrome at a large, quaternary academic medical center.

METHODS

A retrospective observational study was conducted using health records to compare patients who were treated with ticagrelor (Brilinta, AstraZeneca), prasugrel, or clopidogrel for a primary diagnosis of new-onset acute coronary syndrome between January 2014 and December 2014.

RESULTS

A total of 275 patients were identified. Clopidogrel was the most commonly prescribed ADP receptor antagonist (52%), followed by ticagrelor (26%) and prasugrel (22%). Patients who were prescribed clopidogrel were more likely female ( < 0.01), 75 years of age or older ( < 0.01), and 60 kg or less in weight ( = 0.02), and they had more comorbidities. Of the patients on clopidogrel prior to admission, 21% were switched to prasugrel or ticagrelor for inadequate platelet inhibition, restenosis, or new stent placement. Of the patients on ticagrelor or prasugrel prior to admission, 17% were switched to clopidogrel for concerns about bleeding or cost. Clopidogrel was prescribed 13% of the time, prasugrel 13% of the time, and ticagrelor 4% of the time ( = 0.13) outside the recommended use per Food and Drug Administration-approved prescribing information based on relative or absolute contraindications.

CONCLUSION

Clopidogrel continues to be the most commonly prescribed antiplatelet agent, particularly in older patients with more comorbidities.

摘要

目的

在一家大型四级学术医疗中心评估当代急性冠状动脉综合征中腺苷二磷酸(ADP)受体抑制剂的使用情况。

方法

进行一项回顾性观察研究,利用健康记录比较2014年1月至2014年12月期间因新发急性冠状动脉综合征的初步诊断而接受替格瑞洛(倍林达,阿斯利康)、普拉格雷或氯吡格雷治疗的患者。

结果

共识别出275例患者。氯吡格雷是最常处方的ADP受体拮抗剂(52%),其次是替格瑞洛(26%)和普拉格雷(22%)。处方氯吡格雷的患者更可能为女性(P<0.01)、75岁及以上(P<0.01)、体重60千克及以下(P = 0.02),且合并症更多。入院前服用氯吡格雷的患者中,21%因血小板抑制不足、再狭窄或新支架置入而换用普拉格雷或替格瑞洛。入院前服用替格瑞洛或普拉格雷的患者中,17%因出血或费用问题而换用氯吡格雷。根据美国食品药品监督管理局批准的处方信息,基于相对或绝对禁忌证,氯吡格雷在推荐使用范围外的处方时间为13%,普拉格雷为13%,替格瑞洛为4%(P = 0.13)。

结论

氯吡格雷仍然是最常处方的抗血小板药物,尤其是在合并症更多的老年患者中。

相似文献

1
Contemporary Prescription Patterns of Adenosine Diphosphate Receptor Inhibitors in Acute Coronary Syndrome.急性冠状动脉综合征中腺苷二磷酸受体抑制剂的当代处方模式
P T. 2018 Nov;43(11):667-674.
2
Prescription Patterns of Clopidogrel, Prasugrel, and Ticagrelor After Percutaneous Coronary Intervention With Stent Implantation (from the NCDR PINNACLE Registry).经皮冠状动脉介入治疗(支架植入术)后氯吡格雷、普拉格雷和替格瑞洛的处方模式(来自 NCDR PINNACLE 注册研究)。
Am J Cardiol. 2019 Dec 15;124(12):1807-1812. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2019.09.003. Epub 2019 Sep 26.
3
Comparison of prescription rates and clinical outcomes in acute coronary syndrome patients who underwent percutaneous coronary intervention using different P2Y inhibitors in a large observational study.一项大型观察性研究比较了经皮冠状动脉介入治疗的急性冠状动脉综合征患者使用不同 P2Y 抑制剂的处方率和临床结局。
Int J Cardiol. 2019 Jan 1;274:21-26. doi: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2018.09.011. Epub 2018 Sep 5.
4
Clopidogrel, prasugrel or ticagrelor in patients with acute coronary syndromes undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention.急性冠状动脉综合征患者接受经皮冠状动脉介入治疗时使用氯吡格雷、普拉格雷或替卡格雷的情况。
Intern Med J. 2016 May;46(5):559-65. doi: 10.1111/imj.13041.
5
Ticagrelor: an investigational oral antiplatelet treatment for reduction of major adverse cardiac events in patients with acute coronary syndrome.替格瑞洛:一种用于降低急性冠状动脉综合征患者主要不良心脏事件的研究性口服抗血小板治疗药物。
Vasc Health Risk Manag. 2010 Oct 21;6:963-77. doi: 10.2147/VHRM.S13263.
6
In-hospital switching between adenosine diphosphate receptor inhibitors in patients with acute myocardial infarction treated with percutaneous coronary intervention: Insights into contemporary practice from the TRANSLATE-ACS study.经皮冠状动脉介入治疗的急性心肌梗死患者在院内使用二磷酸腺苷受体抑制剂的转换:来自TRANSLATE-ACS研究对当代实践的见解
Eur Heart J Acute Cardiovasc Care. 2015 Dec;4(6):499-508. doi: 10.1177/2048872614564082. Epub 2014 Dec 16.
7
Evolving pattern of platelet P2Y12 inhibition in patients with acute coronary syndromes.急性冠状动脉综合征患者血小板P2Y12抑制的演变模式。
Platelets. 2014;25(6):416-22. doi: 10.3109/09537104.2013.836175. Epub 2013 Oct 10.
8
Prasugrel (Efient®) with percutaneous coronary intervention for treating acute coronary syndromes (review of TA182): systematic review and economic analysis.普拉格雷(Efient®)联合经皮冠状动脉介入治疗急性冠状动脉综合征(TA182综述):系统评价与经济学分析
Health Technol Assess. 2015 Apr;19(29):1-130. doi: 10.3310/hta19290.
9
Comparative pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of platelet adenosine diphosphate receptor antagonists and their clinical implications.血小板二磷酸腺苷受体拮抗剂的比较药代动力学和药效学及其临床意义。
Clin Pharmacokinet. 2012 Jul 1;51(7):429-42. doi: 10.2165/11630740-000000000-00000.
10
Antiplatelet Therapy in ACS Patients: Comparing Appropriate P2Y12 Inhibition by Clopidogrel to the Use of New P2Y12 Inhibitors.急性冠脉综合征患者的抗血小板治疗:比较氯吡格雷对 P2Y12 的适当抑制与新型 P2Y12 抑制剂的应用。
J Atheroscler Thromb. 2018 Aug 1;25(8):674-689. doi: 10.5551/jat.40584. Epub 2018 Feb 8.

引用本文的文献

1
Validation of the Spartan RXCYP2C19 Genotyping Assay Utilizing Blood Samples.使用血样对Spartan RXCYP2C19基因分型检测法进行验证
Clin Transl Sci. 2020 Mar;13(2):260-264. doi: 10.1111/cts.12714. Epub 2019 Nov 29.

本文引用的文献

1
International Expert Consensus on Switching Platelet P2Y Receptor-Inhibiting Therapies.国际血小板 P2Y 受体抑制剂转换治疗专家共识。
Circulation. 2017 Nov 14;136(20):1955-1975. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.117.031164. Epub 2017 Oct 30.
2
Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of Ticagrelor and Prasugrel for the Treatment of Acute Coronary Syndrome.替格瑞洛和普拉格雷治疗急性冠脉综合征的成本效益分析
Value Health Reg Issues. 2016 May;9:22-27. doi: 10.1016/j.vhri.2015.07.001. Epub 2015 Oct 1.
3
Trends in P2Y12 Inhibitor Use in Patients Referred for Invasive Evaluation of Coronary Artery Disease in Contemporary US Practice.当代美国实践中因冠状动脉疾病接受侵入性评估的患者使用P2Y12抑制剂的趋势。
Am J Cardiol. 2016 May 1;117(9):1439-43. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2016.02.012. Epub 2016 Feb 17.
4
Clopidogrel, prasugrel or ticagrelor in patients with acute coronary syndromes undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention.急性冠状动脉综合征患者接受经皮冠状动脉介入治疗时使用氯吡格雷、普拉格雷或替卡格雷的情况。
Intern Med J. 2016 May;46(5):559-65. doi: 10.1111/imj.13041.
5
Treatment pattern of contemporary dual antiplatelet therapies after acute coronary syndrome: a Swedish nationwide population-based cohort study.急性冠状动脉综合征后当代双重抗血小板治疗的治疗模式:一项基于瑞典全国人群的队列研究。
Scand Cardiovasc J. 2016;50(2):99-107. doi: 10.3109/14017431.2015.1119304. Epub 2015 Dec 11.
6
Comparing prasugrel to twice daily clopidogrel post percutaneous coronary intervention in a Veterans Affairs population.在退伍军人事务人群中,比较普拉格雷与经皮冠状动脉介入术后每日两次氯吡格雷的疗效。
Am J Health Syst Pharm. 2015 Sep 1;72(17 Suppl 2):S98-S103. doi: 10.2146/sp150017.
7
Contemporary Use of Ticagrelor in Interventional Practice (from Blue Cross Blue Shield of Michigan Cardiovascular Consortium).替格瑞洛在介入治疗实践中的当代应用(来自密歇根蓝十字蓝盾心血管联盟)
Am J Cardiol. 2015 Jun 1;115(11):1502-6. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2015.02.049. Epub 2015 Mar 12.
8
Long-term use of ticagrelor in patients with prior myocardial infarction.既往心肌梗死患者中长期使用替格瑞洛。
N Engl J Med. 2015 May 7;372(19):1791-800. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1500857. Epub 2015 Mar 14.
9
Economic analysis of ticagrelor therapy from a U.S. perspective: results from the PLATO study.从美国视角对替格瑞洛治疗的经济学分析:来自 PLATO 研究的结果。
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2015 Feb 10;65(5):465-76. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2014.11.034.
10
In-hospital switching between adenosine diphosphate receptor inhibitors in patients with acute myocardial infarction treated with percutaneous coronary intervention: Insights into contemporary practice from the TRANSLATE-ACS study.经皮冠状动脉介入治疗的急性心肌梗死患者在院内使用二磷酸腺苷受体抑制剂的转换:来自TRANSLATE-ACS研究对当代实践的见解
Eur Heart J Acute Cardiovasc Care. 2015 Dec;4(6):499-508. doi: 10.1177/2048872614564082. Epub 2014 Dec 16.