Betancur-Corredor Bibiana, Pino Nancy J, Cardona Santiago, Peñuela Gustavo A
GDCON Research Group, Faculty of Engineering, University Research Headquarters (SIU), University of Antioquia, Street 70# 52-21, Medellín, Colombia; School of Geosciences and Environment, Faculty of Mines, National University of Colombia, Medellín, Colombia.
School of Microbiology, University of Antioquia, Street 70# 52-21, Medellín, Colombia.
J Environ Sci (China). 2015 Feb 1;28:101-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jes.2014.06.044. Epub 2014 Dec 5.
The bioremediation of a long-term contaminated soil through biostimulation and surfactant addition was evaluated. The concentrations of 1,1,1-trichloro-2,2-bis(4-chlorophenyl) ethane (DDT) and its metabolites 1,1-dichloro-2,2-bis(4-chlorophenyl) ethane (DDD) and 1,1-dichloro-2,2-bis(4-chlorophenyl) ethylene (DDE) were monitored during an 8-week remediation process. Physicochemical characterization of the treated soil was performed before and after the bioremediation process. The isolation and identification of predominant microorganisms during the remediation process were also carried out. The efficiency of detoxification was evaluated after each bioremediation protocol. Humidity and pH and the heterotrophic microorganism count were monitored weekly. The DDT concentration was reduced by 79% after 8 weeks via biostimulation with surfactant addition (B+S) and 94.3% via biostimulation alone (B). Likewise, the concentrations of the metabolites DDE and DDD were reduced to levels below the quantification limits. The microorganisms isolated during bioremediation were identified as Bacillus thuringiensis, Flavobacterium sp., Cuprivadius sp., Variovorax soli, Phenylobacterium sp. and Lysobacter sp., among others. Analysis with scanning electron microscopy (SEM) allowed visualization of the colonization patterns of soil particles. The toxicity of the soil before and after bioremediation was evaluated using Vibrio fischeri as a bioluminescent sensor. A decrease in the toxic potential of the soil was verified by the increase of the concentration/effect relationship EC50 to 26.9% and 27.2% for B+S and B, respectively, compared to 0.4% obtained for the soil before treatment and 2.5% by natural attenuation after 8 weeks of treatment.
评估了通过生物刺激和添加表面活性剂对长期受污染土壤进行生物修复的效果。在为期8周的修复过程中,监测了1,1,1-三氯-2,2-双(4-氯苯基)乙烷(滴滴涕)及其代谢产物1,1-二氯-2,2-双(4-氯苯基)乙烷(滴滴滴)和1,1-二氯-2,2-双(4-氯苯基)乙烯(滴滴伊)的浓度。在生物修复过程前后对处理后的土壤进行了物理化学表征。还开展了修复过程中优势微生物的分离和鉴定工作。在每个生物修复方案实施后评估解毒效率。每周监测湿度、pH值和异养微生物数量。通过添加表面活性剂的生物刺激(B+S),8周后滴滴涕浓度降低了79%,仅通过生物刺激(B)降低了94.3%。同样,代谢产物滴滴伊和滴滴滴的浓度降低到了定量限以下。生物修复过程中分离出的微生物被鉴定为苏云金芽孢杆菌、黄杆菌属、贪铜菌属、土壤食酸菌、苯基杆菌属和溶杆菌属等。通过扫描电子显微镜(SEM)分析可以观察到土壤颗粒的定殖模式。以费氏弧菌作为生物发光传感器评估了生物修复前后土壤的毒性。与处理前土壤的0.4%以及处理8周后自然衰减的2.5%相比,B+S和B处理的浓度/效应关系EC50分别提高到26.9%和27.2%,证实土壤的潜在毒性有所降低。