Gamba Amando, Tasca Giordano, Giannico Floriana, Lobiati Elisabetta, Skouse Douglas, Galanti Andrea, Martino Antonello Stefano, Triggiani Michele
Cardiovascular Department, Operative Unit of Cardiac Surgery, Ospedale "A. Manzoni" di Lecco, Lecco, Italy.
Cardiovascular Department, Operative Unit of Cardiac Surgery, Ospedale "A. Manzoni" di Lecco, Lecco, Italy.
Ann Thorac Surg. 2015 Apr;99(4):1228-33. doi: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2014.10.044. Epub 2015 Feb 3.
The aim of this retrospective study was to evaluate our experience of using a simplified aortic valve sleeve procedure to treat aortic root ectasia and aneurysms with or without aortic regurgitation. In experienced hands, 2 aortic valve-sparing procedures, ie, Yacoub and David, have yielded excellent long-term results in the treatment of aortic root aneurysms, with or without aortic regurgitation. However, these techniques are demanding and not widely used. Recently, a new and simplified valve-sparing technique, named "sleeve procedure," has been proposed, and has yielded encouraging early results.
Ninety consecutive patients with aortic root aneurysms underwent sleeve procedures from October 2006 to October 2012. Follow-up data (clinical 100% complete and echocardiographic 93% complete) were acquired from our outpatient clinic or from the referring cardiologist.
The mean age of the patients was 61.5 ± 12.5 years, 79% were male, 16 (18%) had a bicuspid valve, 3 had Marfan syndrome, and 2 had aortic dissection. Over a mean clinical follow-up of 34 ± 19 months, 2 patients died from noncardiac causes and 1 was reoperated on for the recurrence of aortic regurgitation. On follow-up echocardiography after a mean of 18 ± 9 months, aortic regurgitation was absent/negligible, mild or moderate in 62%, 37%, and 1% of patients, respectively, and the diameters of the annulus, Valsalva sinuses, and sinotubular junction were 27.3 + 2.2, 37.0 + 3.4, and 30.6 + 3.1 mm, respectively.
Our encouraging early and medium term results suggest that the sleeve procedure is a safe and effective aortic valve-sparing technique for the treatment of aortic root ectasia and aneurysm. However, longer follow-up is needed in order to draw definitive conclusions.
本回顾性研究的目的是评估我们使用简化主动脉瓣套入术治疗伴或不伴主动脉瓣反流的主动脉根部扩张和动脉瘤的经验。在经验丰富的医生手中,两种保留主动脉瓣的手术,即雅库布手术和大卫手术,在治疗伴或不伴主动脉瓣反流的主动脉根部动脉瘤方面取得了优异的长期效果。然而,这些技术要求较高且未被广泛应用。最近,一种名为“套入术”的新型简化保留瓣膜技术被提出,并取得了令人鼓舞的早期效果。
2006年10月至2012年10月,连续90例主动脉根部动脉瘤患者接受了套入术。随访数据(临床随访100%完整,超声心动图随访93%完整)来自我们的门诊或转诊的心脏病专家。
患者的平均年龄为61.5±12.5岁,79%为男性,16例(18%)有二叶式主动脉瓣,3例有马方综合征,2例有主动脉夹层。平均临床随访34±19个月,2例患者死于非心脏原因,1例因主动脉瓣反流复发接受再次手术。平均18±9个月后的随访超声心动图显示,分别有62%、37%和1%的患者无/轻微或中度主动脉瓣反流,瓣环、主动脉窦和窦管交界处的直径分别为27.3 + 2.2、37.0 + 3.4和30.6 + 3.1 mm。
我们令人鼓舞的早期和中期结果表明,套入术是一种安全有效的保留主动脉瓣技术,用于治疗主动脉根部扩张和动脉瘤。然而,需要更长时间的随访才能得出明确结论。