Hanke Thorsten, Charitos Efstratios I, Stierle Ulrich, Robinson Derek, Gorski Armin, Sievers Hans-H, Misfeld Martin
Clinic of Cardiac and Thoracic Vascular Surgery, University of Luebeck, Luebeck, Germany.
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2009 Feb;137(2):314-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2008.08.006. Epub 2008 Dec 19.
Early results after aortic valve-sparing root reconstruction are excellent. Longer-term follow-up, especially with regard to aortic valve function, is required for further judgment of these techniques.
Between July of 1993 and September of 2006, 108 consecutive patients (mean age 53.0 +/- 15.8 years) underwent the Yacoub operation (group Y) and 83 patients underwent the David operation (group D). Innovative multilevel hierarchic modeling methods were used to analyze aortic regurgitation over time.
In general, aortic regurgitation increased with time in both groups. Factors associated with the development of a significant increase in aortic regurgitation were Marfan syndrome, concomitant cusp intervention, and preoperative aortic anulus dimension. In Marfan syndrome, the initial aortic regurgitation was higher in group Y versus group D (0.56 aortic regurgitation vs 0.29 aortic regurgitation, P = .049), whereas the mean annual progression rate of aortic regurgitation was marginally higher in group Y (0.132 aortic regurgitation vs 0.075 aortic regurgitation, P = .1). Concomitant cusp intervention was associated with a significant aortic regurgitation increase in both groups (P < .0001). There was a trend that smaller preoperative aortic annulus diameters in group D and larger diameters in group Y were associated with increased aortic regurgitation over time.
In regard to aortic regurgitation grade over time, patients with Marfan syndrome and a large preoperative aortic annulus diameter were better treated with the reimplantation technique, whereas those with a smaller diameter were better treated with the remodeling technique. Concomitant free-edge plication of prolapsing cusps was disadvantageous in both groups. Considering these factors may serve to improve the aortic valve longevity after valve-sparing aortic root surgery.
保留主动脉瓣的根部重建术后早期效果良好。需要进行更长时间的随访,尤其是关于主动脉瓣功能的随访,以便进一步评估这些技术。
1993年7月至2006年9月期间,108例连续患者(平均年龄53.0±15.8岁)接受了亚库布手术(Y组),83例患者接受了大卫手术(D组)。采用创新的多级层次建模方法分析随时间变化的主动脉瓣反流情况。
总体而言,两组患者的主动脉瓣反流均随时间增加。与主动脉瓣反流显著增加相关的因素包括马方综合征、合并瓣叶干预和术前主动脉瓣环尺寸。在马方综合征患者中,Y组的初始主动脉瓣反流高于D组(0.56级主动脉瓣反流对0.29级主动脉瓣反流,P = 0.049),而Y组主动脉瓣反流的平均年进展率略高于D组(0.132级主动脉瓣反流对0.075级主动脉瓣反流,P = 0.1)。两组中合并瓣叶干预均与主动脉瓣反流显著增加相关(P < 0.0001)。有一个趋势是,D组术前主动脉瓣环直径较小而Y组较大与随时间主动脉瓣反流增加有关。
就随时间变化的主动脉瓣反流分级而言,马方综合征且术前主动脉瓣环直径较大的患者采用再植入技术治疗效果更好,而直径较小的患者采用重塑技术治疗效果更好。两组中合并脱垂瓣叶的游离缘折叠均不利。考虑这些因素可能有助于提高保留主动脉瓣的主动脉根部手术后主动脉瓣的使用寿命。