Suppr超能文献

非体外循环非接触技术:与SYNTAX试验相比的3年结果

Off-pump no-touch technique: 3-year results compared with the SYNTAX trial.

作者信息

Arrigoni Sara C, Mecozzi Gianclaudio, Grandjean Jan G, Hillege Jan L, Kappetein Arie P, Mariani Massimo A

机构信息

Thoraxcenter, University Medical Center, Groningen, Netherlands

Thoraxcenter Twente, Enschede, Netherlands.

出版信息

Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg. 2015 May;20(5):601-4. doi: 10.1093/icvts/ivv012. Epub 2015 Feb 7.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES

A 3-year follow-up of a retrospective, single-centre clinical study of OPCAB (off-pump coronary artery bypass) no-touch technique with arterial composite grafts and an indirect comparison with clinical outcomes of the 3-year follow-up of the SYNTAX trial.

METHODS

A total of 400 consecutive patients ('all-comers') who underwent OPCAB no-touch coronary surgery. Primary endpoint was 3-year MACCE (major adverse cardiovascular and cerebrovascular events). These results were compared with the randomized arms of the SYNTAX trial.

RESULTS

The observed 3-year survival was 82.2%. The cumulative 3-year freedom from MACCE was 89.7%. The percentage of MACCE was significantly lower (P < 0.001) in the OPCAB no-touch group (10.3%) compared with both arms of the SYNTAX trial (20.2 and 28.0%, respectively). Repeat revascularization in the OPCAB no-touch group (4.3%) was significantly lower (P < 0.001) compared with both arms of the SYNTAX trial (10.7 and 19.7%, respectively). The percentage of stroke was significantly lower (P = 0.032) in the OPCAB no-touch group compared with the CABG arm in the SYNTAX trial (1.3 vs 3.4%). There was no significant difference of stroke rate between the OPCAB no-touch group and the PCI arm of the SYNTAX trial (1.3 vs 2%, P = 0.347).

CONCLUSIONS

The results at the 3-year follow-up showed the safety and efficacy of OPCAB no-touch technique. The OPCAB no-touch technique may improve patients' outcome by minimizing the morbidity and the neurological complications. Prospective controlled trials are needed to confirm these results.

摘要

目的

对采用动脉复合移植物的非体外循环冠状动脉搭桥术(OPCAB)非接触技术进行一项回顾性单中心临床研究的3年随访,并与SYNTAX试验3年随访的临床结果进行间接比较。

方法

共有400例连续接受OPCAB非接触冠状动脉手术的患者(“所有患者”)。主要终点为3年主要不良心血管和脑血管事件(MACCE)。将这些结果与SYNTAX试验的随机分组进行比较。

结果

观察到的3年生存率为82.2%。3年无MACCE累积生存率为89.7%。与SYNTAX试验的两组(分别为20.2%和28.0%)相比,OPCAB非接触组的MACCE百分比显著更低(P < 0.001)(10.3%)。与SYNTAX试验的两组(分别为10.7%和19.7%)相比,OPCAB非接触组的再次血运重建率(4.3%)显著更低(P < 0.001)。与SYNTAX试验的冠状动脉旁路移植术(CABG)组相比,OPCAB非接触组的卒中百分比显著更低(P = 0.032)(1.3%对3.4%)。OPCAB非接触组与SYNTAX试验的经皮冠状动脉介入治疗(PCI)组之间的卒中发生率无显著差异(1.3%对2%,P = 0.347)。

结论

3年随访结果显示了OPCAB非接触技术的安全性和有效性。OPCAB非接触技术可能通过将发病率和神经并发症降至最低来改善患者预后。需要进行前瞻性对照试验来证实这些结果。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验