Suppr超能文献

小儿普通外科手术后电话随访与传统门诊随访的疗效及实用性比较

Efficacy and utility of phone call follow-up after pediatric general surgery versus traditional clinic follow-up.

作者信息

Fischer Kevin, Hogan Virginia, Jager Alesha, von Allmen Daniel

机构信息

Pediatric Nurse Practitioner in the Division of Pediatric and Thoracic Surgery at Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center in OH.

Family Nurse Practitioner in the Division of Pediatric and Thoracic Surgery at Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center in OH.

出版信息

Perm J. 2015 Winter;19(1):11-4. doi: 10.7812/TPP/14-017.

Abstract

CONTEXT

Typical follow-up for surgical procedures consists of an interim history and brief focused physical examination. These appointments occupy clinic resources, require a time investment by the family, and rarely identify problems. Previous studies have demonstrated the safety of a postoperative phone call.

OBJECTIVE

Compare a traditional in-person clinic postoperative visit with postoperative phone call follow-up regarding patient satisfaction, rate of successful follow-up, and clinic resource utilization in a large academic practice.

DESIGN

A retrospective review of charts of patients who underwent select surgical procedures, along with a review of the clinic schedule for the same time period.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Efficacy, patient/family satisfaction, and impact on the clinic.

METHODS

Families were contacted by telephone two weeks after select surgical procedures to assess for complications and questions. Cohorts of patients six months before and six months after implementation were assessed for main outcome measures.

RESULTS

Before implementation, 55.5% of patients (427/769) who had one of the select surgical procedures were seen in the clinic postoperatively, and 62.6% (435/695) had a successful postoperative phone call follow-up. There were also 1090 overall scheduled postoperative appointments. Six months after implementation, overall postoperative appointments decreased 35.5% to 703. Overall, postoperative-scheduled visits decreased by 6% compared with new visits and other general follow-up visits, which each increased by 3%. A satisfaction survey revealed that 93% of patients (n = 231) were highly satisfied with the process. A hospital cost analysis suggested an 89% cost savings ($101.75 per patient for clinic visit vs $12.50 per patient for phone call follow-up).

CONCLUSION

Postoperative phone call follow-up is an effective tool that improves patient and physician efficiency and satisfaction.

摘要

背景

外科手术的典型随访包括中期病史询问和简短的重点体格检查。这些预约占用诊所资源,需要患者家属投入时间,而且很少能发现问题。既往研究已证明术后电话随访的安全性。

目的

在大型学术机构中,比较传统的术后门诊亲自就诊与术后电话随访在患者满意度、成功随访率和诊所资源利用方面的差异。

设计

对接受特定外科手术患者的病历进行回顾性分析,并同时回顾同一时期的诊所日程安排。

主要观察指标

疗效、患者/家属满意度以及对诊所的影响。

方法

在特定外科手术后两周通过电话联系患者家属,以评估并发症和询问相关问题。对实施前六个月和实施后六个月的患者队列进行主要观察指标评估。

结果

实施前,接受特定外科手术之一的患者中有55.5%(427/769)术后到诊所就诊,62.6%(435/695)术后电话随访成功。术后预约就诊总计1090次。实施后六个月,术后预约就诊总数减少35.5%,降至703次。总体而言,术后预约就诊与新就诊及其他一般随访就诊相比减少了6%,而后两者均增加了3%。一项满意度调查显示,93%的患者(n = 231)对该过程高度满意。医院成本分析表明成本节约了89%(门诊就诊每位患者花费101.75美元,电话随访每位患者花费12.50美元)。

结论

术后电话随访是一种有效的工具,可提高患者和医生的效率及满意度。

相似文献

2
Postoperative follow-up: is a phone call enough?术后随访:打个电话就够了吗?
J Pediatr Surg. 2008 Jan;43(1):83-6. doi: 10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2007.09.025.
3
Implementation of a Telephone Postoperative Clinic in an Integrated Health System.在综合医疗系统中实施电话术后诊所。
J Am Coll Surg. 2016 Oct;223(4):644-51. doi: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2016.07.010. Epub 2016 Aug 18.
10

引用本文的文献

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验