Boughey Judy C, Suman Vera J, Mittendorf Elizabeth A, Ahrendt Gretchen M, Wilke Lee G, Taback Bret, Leitch A Marilyn, Flippo-Morton Teresa S, Kuerer Henry M, Bowling Monet, Hunt Kelly K
*Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN †Alliance Statistics and Data Center, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN ‡MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX §University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA ¶University of Wisconsin, Madison, WI ‖Columbia University Medical Center, New York, NY **University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX ††Carolinas Medical Center, Charlotte, NC; and ‡‡Indiana University Medical Center, Indianapolis, IN.
Ann Surg. 2015 Mar;261(3):547-52. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000000551.
To evaluate factors affecting sentinel lymph node (SLN) identification after neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) in patients with initial node-positive breast cancer.
SLN surgery is increasingly used for nodal staging after NAC and optimal technique for SLN identification is important.
The American College of Surgeons Oncology Group Z1071 prospective trial enrolled clinical T0-4, N1-2, M0 breast cancer patients. After NAC, SLN surgery and axillary lymph node dissection (ALND) were planned. Multivariate logistic regression modeling assessing factors influencing SLN identification was performed.
Of 756 patients enrolled, 34 women withdrew, 21 were ineligible, 12 underwent ALND only, and 689 had SLN surgery attempted. At least 1 SLN was identified in 639 patients (92.7%: 95% CI: 90.5%-94.6%). Among factors evaluated, mapping technique was the only factor found to impact SLN identification; with use of blue dye alone increasing the likelihood of failure to identify the SLN relative to using radiolabeled colloid +/- blue dye (P = 0.006; OR = 3.82; 95% CI: 1.47-9.92). The SLN identification rate was 78.6% with blue dye alone; 91.4% with radiolabeled colloid and 93.8% with dual mapping agents. Patient factors (age, body mass index), tumor factors (clinical T or N stage), pathologic nodal response to chemotherapy, site of tracer injection, and length of chemotherapy treatment did not significantly affect the SLN identification rate.
The SLN identification rate after NAC was higher when mapping was performed using radiolabeled colloid alone or with blue dye compared with blue dye alone. Optimal tracer use is important to ensure successful identification of SLN(s) after NAC.
评估影响初始淋巴结阳性乳腺癌患者新辅助化疗(NAC)后前哨淋巴结(SLN)识别的因素。
SLN手术越来越多地用于NAC后的淋巴结分期,最佳的SLN识别技术很重要。
美国外科医师学会肿瘤学组Z1071前瞻性试验纳入了临床T0-4、N1-2、M0期乳腺癌患者。NAC后,计划进行SLN手术和腋窝淋巴结清扫(ALND)。进行多因素逻辑回归建模以评估影响SLN识别的因素。
在纳入的756例患者中,34例女性退出,21例不符合条件,12例仅接受了ALND,689例尝试进行了SLN手术。639例患者(92.7%:95%CI:90.5%-94.6%)中至少识别出1枚SLN。在评估的因素中,定位技术是唯一被发现影响SLN识别的因素;相对于使用放射性胶体+/-蓝色染料,单独使用蓝色染料增加了无法识别SLN的可能性(P = 0.006;OR = 3.82;95%CI:1.47-9.92)。单独使用蓝色染料时SLN识别率为78.6%;使用放射性胶体时为91.4%,使用双重定位剂时为93.8%。患者因素(年龄、体重指数)、肿瘤因素(临床T或N分期)、化疗的病理淋巴结反应、示踪剂注射部位以及化疗疗程长度均未显著影响SLN识别率。
与单独使用蓝色染料相比,使用放射性胶体单独或联合蓝色染料进行定位时,NAC后的SLN识别率更高。最佳示踪剂的使用对于确保NAC后成功识别SLN很重要。