Kida K, Ishikawa T, Yamada A, Shimizu D, Tanabe M, Sasaki T, Ichikawa Y, Endo I
Department of Gastroenterological Surgery, Yokohama City University, Graduate School of Medicine, Yokohama, Japan.
Department of Breast and Thyroid Surgery, Yokohama City University Medical Center, Yokohama, Japan.
Eur J Surg Oncol. 2015 Apr;41(4):566-70. doi: 10.1016/j.ejso.2014.10.066. Epub 2015 Jan 22.
Although sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) is a standard staging method for assessing nodal status of breast cancer patients, SLNB after neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) remains controversial. The aim of this study was to validate the practicality and accuracy of SLNB by our modified Indigocarmine blue dye methods following NAC.
One hundred consecutive cases with breast cancers treated by NAC were enrolled in this study. After NAC, all patients underwent SLNB performed by our modified Indigocarmine blue dye methods without radioisotope, followed by back-up axillary lymph node dissection (ALND).
Sentinel nodes (SNs) were identified in 94 cases (identification rate, 94%); the accuracy was 94.7% (89/94 cases); and the false negative rate (FNR) 13.5% (5/37 cases). For cases with vs. without clinically evident metastatic nodes before NAC, the identification rate was 92.4% (61/66 cases) vs. 97.1% (33/34 cases); the accuracy 91.8% (56/61 cases) vs. 97.0% (32/33 cases) and the FNR 16.1% (5/31 cases) vs. 0% (0/6 case), respectively. There were six patients without identified SNs, three of them had metastatic nodes. False negatives occurred in five cases; in four, fewer than two sentinel nodes had been removed.
Following NAC, the accuracy of SLNB by modified Indigocarmine blue dye methods is adequate compared with other tracers. In patients in whom no SNs have been identified, lymphatic metastasis is likely and therefore ALND is recommended. For patients with cN0 prior to NAC, SLNB by modified Indigocarmine blue dye methods is clinically feasible, though controversial for patients with positive nodes.
尽管前哨淋巴结活检(SLNB)是评估乳腺癌患者淋巴结状态的标准分期方法,但新辅助化疗(NAC)后的SLNB仍存在争议。本研究的目的是通过我们改良的靛胭脂蓝染法验证NAC后SLNB的实用性和准确性。
本研究纳入了100例接受NAC治疗的乳腺癌连续病例。NAC后,所有患者均采用我们改良的无放射性同位素的靛胭脂蓝染法进行SLNB,随后进行腋窝淋巴结清扫(ALND)作为备用。
94例患者成功识别出前哨淋巴结(SNs)(识别率为94%);准确率为94.7%(89/94例);假阴性率(FNR)为13.5%(5/37例)。对于NAC前有与无临床明显转移淋巴结的病例,识别率分别为92.4%(61/66例)和97.1%(33/34例);准确率分别为91.8%(56/61例)和97.0%(32/33例),FNR分别为16.1%(