• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

探寻美国早期心理学的结构:《心理学评论》,1894 - 1908年

Searching for the structure of early American psychology: Networking Psychological Review, 1894-1908.

作者信息

Green Christopher D, Feinerer Ingo, Burman Jeremy T

机构信息

Department of Psychology.

Department of Psychology, Vienna University of Technology.

出版信息

Hist Psychol. 2015 Feb;18(1):15-31. doi: 10.1037/a0038406.

DOI:10.1037/a0038406
PMID:25664883
Abstract

This study investigated the intellectual structure of early American psychology by generating 3 networks that collectively included every substantive article published in Psychological Review during the 15-year period from the journal's start in 1894 until 1908. The networks were laid out so that articles with strongly correlated vocabularies were positioned close to each other spatially. Then, we identified distinct research communities by locating and interpreting article clusters within the networks. We found that, from the first 5-year time block to the second, psychological specialties rapidly differentiated themselves from each other. Between the second and third 5-year time blocks, however, the number of specialties shrunk. We discuss the degree to which this shift may have been attributable either to a change in the journal's editorship in 1904, or to a broader crisis of confidence, beginning that same year, in the use of "consciousness" as the discipline's defining concept.

摘要

本研究通过生成3个网络来探究美国早期心理学的知识结构,这3个网络共同涵盖了从1894年《心理学评论》创刊至1908年这15年间发表在该期刊上的每一篇实质性文章。这些网络的布局方式是,词汇相关性强的文章在空间上彼此靠近。然后,我们通过定位和解读网络中的文章集群来识别不同的研究群体。我们发现,从第一个5年时间段到第二个5年时间段,心理学专业迅速分化。然而,在第二个和第三个5年时间段之间,专业数量减少了。我们讨论了这种转变在多大程度上可能归因于1904年该期刊编辑的变动,或者归因于从同年开始的对将“意识”作为该学科定义概念的更广泛的信心危机。

相似文献

1
Searching for the structure of early American psychology: Networking Psychological Review, 1894-1908.探寻美国早期心理学的结构:《心理学评论》,1894 - 1908年
Hist Psychol. 2015 Feb;18(1):15-31. doi: 10.1037/a0038406.
2
Searching for the structure of early American psychology: Networking Psychological Review, 1909-1923.探寻早期美国心理学的结构:《心理学评论》网络版,1909 - 1923年
Hist Psychol. 2015 May;18(2):196-204. doi: 10.1037/a0039013.
3
The Evolution of the American Journal of Psychology, 1904-1918: A Network Investigation.《美国心理学杂志的演变,1904 - 1918:一项网络调查》
Am J Psychol. 2016 Summer;129(2):185-96. doi: 10.5406/amerjpsyc.129.2.0185.
4
The Evolution of The American Journal of Psychology 1, 1887-1903: A Network Investigation.《美国心理学杂志》的演变,1887 - 1903年:一项网络调查
Am J Psychol. 2015 Fall;128(3):387-401. doi: 10.5406/amerjpsyc.128.3.0387.
5
Beyond the schools of psychology 1: a digital analysis of Psychological Review, 1894-1903.超越心理学流派1:对《心理学评论》(1894 - 1903年)的数字化分析
J Hist Behav Sci. 2013 Spring;49(2):167-89. doi: 10.1002/jhbs.21592. Epub 2013 Feb 20.
6
Beyond the schools of psychology 2: a digital analysis of psychological review, 1904-1923.超越心理学流派2:1904 - 1923年《心理学评论》的数字分析
J Hist Behav Sci. 2014 Summer;50(3):249-79. doi: 10.1002/jhbs.21665. Epub 2014 Jun 9.
7
How the launch of a new journal in 1904 may have changed the relationship between psychology and philosophy.1904年一本新期刊的创刊可能如何改变了心理学与哲学之间的关系。
Hist Psychol. 2017 Feb;20(1):72-91. doi: 10.1037/hop0000041. Epub 2016 Aug 25.
8
125 years of the American Journal of Psychology: a historical overview.《美国心理学杂志》125年:历史概述
Am J Psychol. 2012 Spring;125(1):3-8. doi: 10.5406/amerjpsyc.125.1.0003.
9
Sleeping beauties in psychology: comparisons of "hits" and "missed signals" in psychological journals.心理学领域的沉睡之美:心理学期刊中“成功案例”与“信号错失”的比较
Hist Psychol. 2005 May;8(2):194-217. doi: 10.1037/1093-4510.8.2.194.
10
Qualitative research in psychology: Could William James get a job?心理学中的定性研究:威廉·詹姆斯能找到工作吗?
Hist Psychol. 2007 Nov;10(4):301-324. doi: 10.1037/1093-4510.10.4.301.

引用本文的文献

1
On Kuhn's case, and Piaget's: A critical two-sited hauntology (or, On impact without reference).论库恩的情况与皮亚杰的情况:一种批判性的双位点幽灵学(或者,论无指涉的影响)
Hist Human Sci. 2020 Oct;33(3-4):129-159. doi: 10.1177/0952695120911576. Epub 2020 Jul 2.
2
Mining a Crowdsourced Dictionary to Understand Consistency and Preference in Word Meanings.挖掘众包词典以理解词义的一致性和偏好
Front Psychol. 2019 Feb 18;10:268. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2019.00268. eCollection 2019.