Department of Psychology and Behavioural Sciences, School of Business and Social Sciences, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark.
Clin Pharmacol Ther. 2015 Feb;97(2):143-50. doi: 10.1002/cpt.31. Epub 2015 Jan 9.
The placebo effect in randomized clinical trials appears to have increased thereby contributing to problems of demonstrating statistically reliable effects of treatments that directly target biological mechanisms. The shortcomings of randomized clinical trials are currently discussed along with potential improvements of trial designs. In this review we explain how utilizing knowledge from the placebo and nocebo mechanisms literature could improve the information that can be obtained from randomized clinical trials. We present three major challenges in randomized clinical trials: (i) increasing placebo effects, (ii) variability of the placebo effect, and (iii) risk of un-blinding. We then explain how recent placebo and nocebo studies of effects of verbal suggestion, expectancy, and emotions may improve understanding and discussion of increasing placebo effects, account/control for large parts of the variability of placebo effects, and suggest ways to improve blinding in future trials.
随机临床试验中的安慰剂效应似乎有所增加,从而导致直接针对生物机制的治疗方法在统计学上显示可靠效果的问题。目前正在讨论随机临床试验的缺点,以及试验设计的潜在改进。在这篇综述中,我们解释了如何利用安慰剂和反安慰剂机制文献中的知识来提高从随机临床试验中获得的信息。我们提出了随机临床试验中的三个主要挑战:(i)增加安慰剂效应,(ii)安慰剂效应的可变性,和(iii)失盲的风险。然后,我们解释了最近关于口头建议、期望和情绪对安慰剂效应影响的安慰剂和反安慰剂研究如何有助于增加安慰剂效应的理解和讨论,解释了安慰剂效应的大部分可变性,并提出了在未来试验中改进盲法的方法。