Colloca Luana, Fava Maurizio
Department of Pain and Translational Symptom Science, Placebo Beyond Opinions Center, University of Maryland School of Nursing, Baltimore, MD, USA.
Department of Psychiatry, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA.
Nat Ment Health. 2024 Oct;2(10):1152-1160. doi: 10.1038/s44220-024-00321-2. Epub 2024 Sep 30.
Over the past decade there has been a surge in interest in placebo-controlled trials using non-classical 3,4-methylenedioxymethamphetamine (MDMA) and classical psychedelics such as psilocybin, lysergic acid diethylamide (LSD) and ,-dimethyltryptamine (DMT) to treat neuropsychiatric disorders. However, the success and reliability of these trials depend on the design of the trials, the choice of control conditions, and the ability to blind both participants and researchers. When appropriate control conditions are lacking, it becomes difficult to disentangle placebo and expectation effects from medication effects. Here we explore the neurobiology of placebo and expectation effects, alongside the methodological considerations for selecting suitable control conditions in psychedelic trials. This includes examining the advantages and disadvantages of various control conditions and proposing new directions to enhance the validity of these trials and their regulatory science. By addressing these factors, we aim to improve the reliability of psychedelic research in uncovering the therapeutic benefits of psychedelics beyond placebo and expectation effects.
在过去十年中,使用非经典的3,4-亚甲基二氧甲基苯丙胺(摇头丸)以及经典致幻剂如裸盖菇素、麦角酸二乙胺(LSD)和N,N-二甲基色胺(DMT)进行安慰剂对照试验以治疗神经精神疾病的兴趣激增。然而,这些试验的成功与可靠性取决于试验设计、对照条件的选择以及使参与者和研究人员均保持盲态的能力。当缺乏适当的对照条件时,就难以将安慰剂和期望效应与药物效应区分开来。在此,我们探讨安慰剂和期望效应的神经生物学,以及在致幻剂试验中选择合适对照条件的方法学考量。这包括审视各种对照条件的优缺点,并提出新的方向以提高这些试验及其监管科学的有效性。通过解决这些因素,我们旨在提高致幻剂研究在揭示致幻剂超出安慰剂和期望效应的治疗益处方面的可靠性。