Ananth Cande V, Skjaerven Rolv, Klunssoyr Kari
Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, College of Physicians and Surgeons, Columbia University, New York, New York, USA Department of Epidemiology, Mailman School of Public Health, Columbia University, New York, New York, USA.
Department of Global Public Health and Primary Care, University of Bergen, Bergen, Norway Medical Birth Registry of Norway, Norwegian Institute of Public Health, Bergen, Norway.
BMJ Open. 2015 Feb 10;5(2):e007023. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2014-007023.
We examined abruption risk in relation to change in paternity, and evaluated if birth interval confounds this association.
Population-based study of singleton births in Norway between 1967 and 2009.
Women who had their first two (n=747 566) singleton births in the Norwegian Medical Birth Registry. The associations between partner change between pregnancies and birth interval were examined in relation to abruption in a series of logistic regression models.
Risk, as well as unadjusted and adjusted OR of placental abruption in relation to change in paternity and interval between births.
Among women without abruption in their first pregnancy, the risks of abruption in the second pregnancy were 4.7 and 6.5 per 1000 in women who had the same and different partners, respectively (OR=1.39, 95% CI 1.26 to 1.53). After adjustments for confounders including birth interval and smoking, partner change was not associated with abruption (OR=1.01, 95% CI 0.79 to 1.32). Among women with abruption in the first pregnancy, the association between partner change and abruption in the second pregnancy was 0.98 (95% CI 0.75 to 1.28). Interval <1 year was associated with increased abruption risk in the second pregnancy among women with the same as well as different partners, but interval over 4 years was only associated with increased risk among women with the same partner. No such patterns were seen for recurrent abruption.
We find no evidence that a change in partner is associated with increased abruption risk. Theories supporting an immune maladaptation hypothesis afforded by change in paternity are not supported insofar as abruption is concerned.
我们研究了与父亲身份变化相关的胎盘早剥风险,并评估生育间隔是否混淆了这种关联。
基于挪威1967年至2009年单胎分娩的人群研究。
在挪威医学出生登记处有头两次(n = 747566)单胎分娩的女性。在一系列逻辑回归模型中,研究了孕期伴侣变化与生育间隔之间的关联与胎盘早剥的关系。
与父亲身份变化和两次分娩间隔相关的胎盘早剥风险、未调整和调整后的比值比。
在首次怀孕未发生胎盘早剥的女性中,第二次怀孕时,伴侣相同和不同的女性胎盘早剥风险分别为每1000例中有4.7例和6.5例(比值比=1.39,95%置信区间1.26至1.53)。在对包括生育间隔和吸烟等混杂因素进行调整后,伴侣变化与胎盘早剥无关(比值比=1.01,95%置信区间0.79至1.32)。在首次怀孕发生胎盘早剥的女性中,第二次怀孕时伴侣变化与胎盘早剥的关联为0.98(95%置信区间0.75至1.28)。生育间隔<1年与伴侣相同和不同的女性第二次怀孕时胎盘早剥风险增加相关,但生育间隔超过4年仅与伴侣相同的女性风险增加相关。复发性胎盘早剥未见此类模式。
我们没有发现证据表明伴侣变化与胎盘早剥风险增加有关。就胎盘早剥而言,支持父亲身份变化导致免疫适应不良假说的理论未得到支持。