• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Association of Short Interpregnancy Interval With Pregnancy Outcomes According to Maternal Age.短间隔妊娠与母婴年龄相关的妊娠结局的关系。
JAMA Intern Med. 2018 Dec 1;178(12):1661-1670. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2018.4696.
2
Short interpregnancy intervals and adverse pregnancy outcomes by maternal age in the United States.美国的母婴年龄与妊娠间隔时间短和不良妊娠结局。
Ann Epidemiol. 2019 Mar;31:38-44. doi: 10.1016/j.annepidem.2018.12.002. Epub 2018 Dec 11.
3
Interpregnancy Interval and Adverse Pregnancy Outcomes: An Analysis of Successive Pregnancies.妊娠间隔与不良妊娠结局:连续妊娠分析
Obstet Gynecol. 2017 Mar;129(3):408-415. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000001891.
4
Short interpregnancy interval and pregnancy outcomes: How important is the timing of confounding variable ascertainment?短孕期间隔与妊娠结局:混杂变量确定的时机有多重要?
Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol. 2021 Jul;35(4):428-437. doi: 10.1111/ppe.12716. Epub 2020 Dec 3.
5
The influence of interpregnancy interval on the subsequent risk of stillbirth and early neonatal death.妊娠间隔对死产及早期新生儿死亡后续风险的影响。
Obstet Gynecol. 2003 Jul;102(1):101-8. doi: 10.1016/s0029-7844(03)00366-1.
6
Long and short interpregnancy intervals increase severe maternal morbidity.较长和较短的孕次间隔会增加严重产妇发病率。
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2021 Sep;225(3):331.e1-331.e8. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2021.05.013. Epub 2021 May 20.
7
Interpregnancy interval and perinatal outcomes across Latin America from 1990 to 2009: a large multi-country study.1990 年至 2009 年拉丁美洲的妊娠间隔和围产期结局:一项大型多国研究。
BJOG. 2016 Apr;123(5):730-7. doi: 10.1111/1471-0528.13625. Epub 2015 Sep 24.
8
Advanced maternal age, short interpregnancy interval, and perinatal outcome.高龄产妇、短间隔妊娠和围产儿结局。
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2011 May;204(5):421.e1-9. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2010.12.008. Epub 2011 Feb 2.
9
Association between interpregnancy interval and adverse birth outcomes in women with a previous stillbirth: an international cohort study.有过死胎史的女性妊娠间隔与不良出生结局的关系:一项国际队列研究。
Lancet. 2019 Apr 13;393(10180):1527-1535. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(18)32266-9. Epub 2019 Feb 28.
10
Pregnancy, Delivery, and Neonatal Outcomes Associated With Maternal Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder: Two Cohort Studies in Sweden and British Columbia, Canada.与母体强迫症相关的妊娠、分娩和新生儿结局:瑞典和加拿大不列颠哥伦比亚省的两项队列研究。
JAMA Netw Open. 2023 Jun 1;6(6):e2318212. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2023.18212.

引用本文的文献

1
The optimal childbearing age and birth spacing in china: a multicenter retrospective cohort study.中国的最佳生育年龄和生育间隔:一项多中心回顾性队列研究。
BMC Public Health. 2025 Aug 30;25(1):2983. doi: 10.1186/s12889-025-24466-6.
2
Effect of Interpregnancy Interval on Pregnancy Outcome in a Tertiary Care Centre: A Descriptive Cross-sectional Study.三级医疗中心妊娠间隔对妊娠结局的影响:一项描述性横断面研究。
JNMA J Nepal Med Assoc. 2024 Oct;62(278):675-680. doi: 10.31729/jnma.8775. Epub 2024 Oct 31.
3
Factors Associated With Contraceptive Initiation and Use Among Women Who Have Given Birth in the Last Year: Findings From the 2023 Women's Reproductive Health Survey.去年生育的女性中与开始使用和使用避孕药具相关的因素:2023年女性生殖健康调查结果
BJOG. 2025 Oct;132(11):1615-1625. doi: 10.1111/1471-0528.18264. Epub 2025 Jul 9.
4
Factors associated with Nugent-bacterial vaginosis in pregnancy and postpartum among women in rural northwestern Bangladesh.孟加拉国西北部农村地区女性妊娠和产后与 Nugent 细菌性阴道病相关的因素。
PLOS Glob Public Health. 2025 Jun 13;5(6):e0004768. doi: 10.1371/journal.pgph.0004768. eCollection 2025.
5
Mother and Infant Research Electronic Data Analysis (MIREDA): A protocol for creating a common data model for federated analysis of UK birth cohorts and the life course.母婴研究电子数据分析(MIREDA):为英国出生队列和生命历程的联合分析创建通用数据模型的方案。
Int J Popul Data Sci. 2024 Sep 12;9(2):2406. doi: 10.23889/ijpds.v9i2.2406. eCollection 2024.
6
Maternal Age Differences in Interpregnancy Interval and Preterm Birth Associations Accounting for Multiple Epidemiologic Biases.考虑多种流行病学偏倚因素下,孕次间隔与早产关联中的产妇年龄差异。
Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol. 2025 Jul;39(5):465-474. doi: 10.1111/ppe.70022. Epub 2025 Apr 30.
7
The association between interpregnancy intervals and preterm birth: a systematic review and meta-analysis.孕期间隔与早产之间的关联:一项系统评价与荟萃分析。
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2025 Feb 28;25(1):226. doi: 10.1186/s12884-025-07259-y.
8
Association between levothyroxine supplementation for hypothyroidism in late pregnancy and risk of prematurity: a population-based cohort study.妊娠晚期补充左甲状腺素治疗甲状腺功能减退与早产风险的关联:一项基于人群的队列研究。
BMC Med. 2025 Feb 21;23(1):105. doi: 10.1186/s12916-025-03934-1.
9
Inter-pregnancy interval and uterine rupture during a trial of labour after one previous caesarean delivery and no previous vaginal births: a retrospective population-based cohort study.既往有一次剖宫产史且无阴道分娩史的产妇在试产期间的妊娠间隔与子宫破裂:一项基于人群的回顾性队列研究。
EClinicalMedicine. 2025 Jan 21;80:103071. doi: 10.1016/j.eclinm.2025.103071. eCollection 2025 Feb.
10
Association between interpregnancy interval and adverse perinatal outcomes according to maternal age in the context of China's two-child policy.在中国二孩政策背景下,妊娠间隔与不同孕产妇年龄的不良围产期结局之间的关联。
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2025 Jan 27;25(1):81. doi: 10.1186/s12884-025-07136-8.

本文引用的文献

1
ACOG Committee Opinion No. 736: Optimizing Postpartum Care.美国妇产科医师学会委员会意见 No.736:优化产后护理。
Obstet Gynecol. 2018 May;131(5):e140-e150. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000002633.
2
Intimate partner violence and pregnancy spacing: results from a meta-analysis of individual participant time-to-event data from 29 low-and-middle-income countries.亲密伴侣暴力与生育间隔:对来自29个低收入和中等收入国家的个体参与者事件发生时间数据进行荟萃分析的结果
BMJ Glob Health. 2018 Jan 13;3(1):e000304. doi: 10.1136/bmjgh-2017-000304. eCollection 2018.
3
The Impact of Computing Interpregnancy Intervals Without Accounting for Intervening Pregnancy Events.不考虑中间妊娠事件计算妊娠间隔的影响。
Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol. 2018 Mar;32(2):141-148. doi: 10.1111/ppe.12458. Epub 2018 Mar 9.
4
Effect of Interpregnancy Interval on Adverse Perinatal Outcomes in Southern China: A Retrospective Cohort Study, 2000-2015.妊娠间隔对中国南方围产期不良结局的影响:一项2000 - 2015年的回顾性队列研究
Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol. 2018 Mar;32(2):131-140. doi: 10.1111/ppe.12432. Epub 2018 Jan 2.
5
Within-Family Analysis of Interpregnancy Interval and Adverse Birth Outcomes.妊娠间隔与不良分娩结局的家庭内分析
Obstet Gynecol. 2017 Dec;130(6):1304-1311. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000002358.
6
Advanced maternal age and adverse pregnancy outcomes: A systematic review and meta-analysis.高龄孕产妇与不良妊娠结局:一项系统评价与荟萃分析。
PLoS One. 2017 Oct 17;12(10):e0186287. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0186287. eCollection 2017.
7
Sensitivity Analysis in Observational Research: Introducing the E-Value.观察性研究中的敏感性分析:引入 E 值。
Ann Intern Med. 2017 Aug 15;167(4):268-274. doi: 10.7326/M16-2607. Epub 2017 Jul 11.
8
Interpregnancy Interval and Adverse Pregnancy Outcomes: An Analysis of Successive Pregnancies.妊娠间隔与不良妊娠结局:连续妊娠分析
Obstet Gynecol. 2017 Mar;129(3):408-415. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000001891.
9
Pregnancy Intention and Pregnancy Outcome: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.妊娠意愿与妊娠结局:系统评价与荟萃分析
Matern Child Health J. 2017 Mar;21(3):670-704. doi: 10.1007/s10995-016-2237-0.
10
The influence of interpregnancy interval on infant mortality.妊娠间隔对婴儿死亡率的影响。
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2017 Mar;216(3):316.e1-316.e9. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2016.12.018. Epub 2016 Dec 27.

短间隔妊娠与母婴年龄相关的妊娠结局的关系。

Association of Short Interpregnancy Interval With Pregnancy Outcomes According to Maternal Age.

机构信息

Department of Epidemiology, Harvard T. H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, Massachusetts.

Department of Family Practice, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.

出版信息

JAMA Intern Med. 2018 Dec 1;178(12):1661-1670. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2018.4696.

DOI:10.1001/jamainternmed.2018.4696
PMID:30383085
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6583597/
Abstract

IMPORTANCE

Interpregnancy intervals shorter than 18 months are associated with higher risks of adverse pregnancy outcomes. It is currently unknown whether short intervals are associated with increased risks among older women to the same extent as among younger women.

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate whether the association between short interpregnancy (delivery to conception) interval and adverse pregnancy outcomes is modified by maternal age.

DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: A population-based cohort study conducted in British Columbia, Canada, evaluated women with 2 or more singleton pregnancies from 2004 to 2014 with the first (index) pregnancy resulting in a live birth. Data analysis was performed from January 1 to July 20, 2018.

MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES

Risks of maternal mortality or severe morbidity (eg, mechanical ventilation, blood transfusion >3 U, intensive care unit admission, organ failure, death), small-for-gestational age (<10th birthweight percentile for gestational age and sex), fetal and infant composite outcome (stillbirth, infant death, <third birthweight percentile for gestational age and sex, delivery <28 weeks), and spontaneous and indicated preterm delivery. Risks of each outcome for 3- to 24-month interpregnancy intervals were estimated, according to maternal age at index birth (20-34 and ≥35 years). Adjusted risk ratios (aRRs) comparing predicted risks at 3-, 6-, 9-, and 12-month intervals with risks at 18-month intervals for each age group were calculated. The potential role of other factors explaining any differences (unmeasured confounding) was examined in several sensitivity analyses.

RESULTS

Among 148 544 pregnancies, maternal mortality or severe morbidity risks were increased at 6-month compared with 18-month interpregnancy intervals for women aged 35 years or older (0.62% at 6 months vs 0.26% at 18 months; aRR, 2.39; 95% CI, 2.03-2.80), but not for women aged 20 to 34 years (0.23% at 6 months vs 0.25% at 18 months; aRR, 0.92; 95% CI, 0.83-1.02). Increased adverse fetal and infant outcome risks were more pronounced for women aged 20 to 34 years (2.0% at 6 months vs 1.4% at 18 months; aRR, 1.42; 95% CI, 1.36-1.47) than women 35 years or older (2.1% at 6 months vs 1.8% at 18 months; aRR, 1.15; 95% CI, 1.01-1.31). Risks of spontaneous preterm delivery at 6-month interpregnancy intervals were increased for women 20 to 34 years old (5.3% at 6 months vs 3.2% at 18 months; aRR, 1.65; 95% CI, 1.62-1.68) and to a lesser extent for women 35 years or older (5.0% at 6 months vs 3.6% at 18 months; aRR, 1.40; 95% CI, 1.31-1.49). Modest increases in risks of small-for-gestational age and indicated preterm delivery at short intervals did not vary meaningfully by maternal age. Sensitivity analyses suggested that observed associations were not fully explained by unmeasured confounding.

CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE

The findings of this study suggest that short interpregnancy intervals are associated with increased risks for adverse pregnancy outcomes for women of all ages.

摘要

重要性:妊娠间隔时间短于 18 个月与不良妊娠结局的风险增加相关。目前尚不清楚在年龄较大的女性中,短间隔是否与年轻女性一样,增加了发生风险的程度。

目的:评估在妊娠间隔(分娩至受孕)较短的情况下,产妇年龄是否会影响不良妊娠结局的发生。

设计、设置和参与者:本研究是一项基于人群的队列研究,在加拿大不列颠哥伦比亚省进行,纳入了 2004 年至 2014 年期间有 2 次或以上单胎妊娠且首次(索引)妊娠为活产的女性。数据分析于 2018 年 1 月 1 日至 7 月 20 日进行。

主要结果和测量:根据索引分娩时的母亲年龄(20-34 岁和≥35 岁),评估了产妇死亡率或严重发病率(如机械通气、输血>3U、入住重症监护病房、器官衰竭、死亡)、小于胎龄儿(<第 10 个胎龄和性别出生体重百分位)、胎儿和婴儿复合结局(死胎、婴儿死亡、<第 3 个胎龄和性别出生体重百分位、<28 周分娩)以及自发性和指征性早产的风险。根据母亲年龄,计算了 3-24 个月妊娠间隔的每个结局的风险,并与 18 个月间隔的风险进行了比较。对于每个年龄组,计算了预测风险在 3、6、9 和 12 个月时与 18 个月间隔时的风险的调整风险比(aRR)。通过几个敏感性分析,检查了其他因素(未测量的混杂因素)解释任何差异的作用。

结果:在 148544 例妊娠中,与 18 个月的妊娠间隔相比,35 岁或以上的女性在 6 个月时的产妇死亡率或严重发病率风险增加(6 个月时为 0.62%,18 个月时为 0.26%;aRR,2.39;95%CI,2.03-2.80),但 20-34 岁的女性则不然(6 个月时为 0.23%,18 个月时为 0.25%;aRR,0.92;95%CI,0.83-1.02)。对于 20-34 岁的女性,不良胎儿和婴儿结局的风险增加更为明显(6 个月时为 2.0%,18 个月时为 1.4%;aRR,1.42;95%CI,1.36-1.47),而对于 35 岁或以上的女性则不然(6 个月时为 2.1%,18 个月时为 1.8%;aRR,1.15;95%CI,1.01-1.31)。对于 20-34 岁的女性,6 个月妊娠间隔时自发性早产的风险增加(6 个月时为 5.3%,18 个月时为 3.2%;aRR,1.65;95%CI,1.62-1.68),而对于 35 岁或以上的女性则不那么明显(6 个月时为 5.0%,18 个月时为 3.6%;aRR,1.40;95%CI,1.31-1.49)。短间隔时小胎龄儿和指征性早产风险的适度增加与产妇年龄无明显关系。敏感性分析表明,观察到的关联并未完全由未测量的混杂因素解释。

结论和相关性:本研究结果表明,妊娠间隔时间较短与所有年龄段女性的不良妊娠结局风险增加有关。