Przedworski Julia M, Dovidio John F, Hardeman Rachel R, Phelan Sean M, Burke Sara E, Ruben Mollie A, Perry Sylvia P, Burgess Diana J, Nelson David B, Yeazel Mark W, Knudsen John M, van Ryn Michelle
J.M. Przedworski is a doctoral student and National Cancer Institute predoctoral fellow, Division of Health Policy and Management, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota. J.F. Dovidio is Carl Iver Hovland Professor, Department of Psychology, Yale School of Public Health, and Center for Interdisciplinary Research on AIDS, Yale University, New Haven, Connecticut. R.R. Hardeman is an associated health postdoctoral fellow, Center for Chronic Disease Outcomes Research, Minneapolis Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Minneapolis, Minnesota. S.M. Phelan is assistant professor, Division of Health Care Policy and Research, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota. S.E. Burke is a doctoral candidate, Department of Psychology, Yale University, New Haven, Connecticut. M.A. Ruben is a postdoctoral research fellow, Center for Healthcare Organization and Implementation Research, Department of Veterans Affairs, Boston, Massachusetts. S.P. Perry is assistant professor, Department of Psychological Science, University of Vermont, Burlington, Vermont. D.J. Burgess is associate professor, Department of Medicine, University of Minnesota, and core investigator, Center for Chronic Disease Outcomes Research, Minneapolis Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Minneapolis, Minnesota. D.B. Nelson is core investigator and senior statistician, Center for Chronic Disease Outcomes Research, Minneapolis Veterans Affairs Medical Center, and associate professor, Department of Medicine, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota. M.W. Yeazel is associate professor, Department of Family Medicine and Community Health, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota. J.M. Knudsen is director, Office of Health Equity and Inclusion, and assistant professor, Radiology Department, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota. M. van Ryn is professor, Health Services Research, Mayo Clinic College of Medicine, and director, Research Program on Equity and Quality of Patient-Provider Encounters, Division of Health Care Polic
Acad Med. 2015 May;90(5):652-9. doi: 10.1097/ACM.0000000000000658.
Research is lacking on psychological distress and disorder among sexual minority medical students (students who identify as nonheterosexual). If left unaddressed, distress may result in academic and professional difficulties and undermine workforce diversity goals. The authors compared depression, anxiety, and self-rated health among sexual minority and heterosexual medical students.
This study included 4,673 first-year students who self-reported sexual orientation in the fall 2010 baseline survey of the Medical Student Cognitive Habits and Growth Evaluation Study, a national longitudinal cohort study. The authors used items from published scales to measure depression, anxiety, self-rated health, and social stressors. They conducted bivariate and multivariate analyses to estimate the association between sexual identity and depression, anxiety, and self-rated health.
Of 4,673 students, 232 (5.0%) identified as a sexual minority. Compared with heterosexual students, after adjusting for relevant covariates, sexual minority students had greater risk of depressive symptoms (adjusted relative risk [ARR] = 1.59 [95% confidence interval, 1.24-2.04]), anxiety symptoms (ARR = 1.64 [1.08-2.49]), and low self-rated health (ARR = 1.77 [1.15-2.60]). Sexual minority students were more likely to report social stressors, including harassment (22.7% versus 12.7%, P < .001) and isolation (53.7% versus 42.8%, P = .001). Exposure to social stressors attenuated but did not eliminate the observed associations between minority sexual identity and mental and self-reported health measures.
First-year sexual minority students experience significantly greater risk of depression, anxiety, and low self-rated health than heterosexual students. Targeted interventions are needed to improve mental health and well-being.
针对性少数群体医学生(即认同自己为非异性恋的学生)的心理困扰和心理障碍的研究较为匮乏。若不加以解决,这些困扰可能会导致学业和职业方面的困难,并破坏劳动力多元化目标。作者比较了性少数群体医学生和异性恋医学生的抑郁、焦虑及自评健康状况。
本研究纳入了4673名一年级学生,这些学生在2010年秋季对医学生认知习惯与成长评估研究(一项全国性纵向队列研究)的基线调查中自行报告了性取向。作者使用已发表量表中的项目来测量抑郁、焦虑、自评健康状况和社会压力源。他们进行了双变量和多变量分析,以估计性取向与抑郁、焦虑及自评健康状况之间的关联。
在4673名学生中,有多达232名(5.0%)认同自己为性少数群体。在调整了相关协变量后,与异性恋学生相比,性少数群体学生出现抑郁症状的风险更高(调整后的相对风险[ARR]=1.59[95%置信区间,1.24 - 2.04])、焦虑症状(ARR = 1.64[1.08 - 2.49])以及自评健康状况较差(ARR = 1.77[1.15 - 2.60])。性少数群体学生更有可能报告遭受社会压力源,包括骚扰(22.7%对12.7%,P <.001)和孤立(53.7%对42.8%,P =.001)。接触社会压力源减弱了但并未消除所观察到的少数性取向与心理及自评健康指标之间的关联。
一年级性少数群体学生比异性恋学生经历抑郁、焦虑和自评健康状况较差的风险显著更高。需要有针对性的干预措施来改善心理健康和幸福感。