Davis N L
Department of Pediatrics, Division of Neonatology, University of Maryland Children's Hospital, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA.
J Perinatol. 2015 Apr;35(4):235-40. doi: 10.1038/jp.2015.1. Epub 2015 Feb 12.
The infant car seat challenge (ICSC), or period of observation in a car safety seat before discharge to monitor for episodes of apnea, bradycardia and desaturation, is one of the most common tests performed on preterm neonates in the United States. However, the utility of the ICSC to identify infants at risk for adverse cardiopulmonary events in the car seat remains unclear. Minimal evidence exists to guide clinicians in performance of this test including appropriate inclusion criteria and failure criteria. In this article, the origins of the ICSC are discussed as well as potential etiologies of desaturations and bradycardia in the car seat position. Current literature on implementation, inclusion and failure criteria, incidence of failure and data on the meaning of a 'passed' vs 'failed' ICSC are discussed. Emphasis is made on minimizing time in car seats and seated devices given concern over the risk of desaturations.
婴儿汽车安全座椅挑战试验(ICSC),即在出院前于汽车安全座椅上进行观察期以监测呼吸暂停、心动过缓和血氧饱和度下降发作情况,是美国对早产儿进行的最常见检查之一。然而,ICSC用于识别在汽车安全座椅上有发生不良心肺事件风险的婴儿的效用仍不明确。几乎没有证据可指导临床医生进行此项检查,包括合适的纳入标准和失败标准。在本文中,将讨论ICSC的起源以及在汽车安全座椅位置时血氧饱和度下降和心动过缓的潜在病因。还将讨论关于实施、纳入和失败标准、失败发生率以及“通过”与“未通过”ICSC含义的数据的当前文献。鉴于对血氧饱和度下降风险的担忧,重点是尽量减少在汽车安全座椅和坐式设备中的时间。