Suppr超能文献

早产儿汽车安全座椅:婴儿汽车安全座椅挑战的实施和测试参数。

Car seat safety for preterm neonates: implementation and testing parameters of the infant car seat challenge.

机构信息

Boston Children's Hospital Division of Newborn Medicine, Boston, MA 02115, USA.

出版信息

Acad Pediatr. 2013 May-Jun;13(3):272-7. doi: 10.1016/j.acap.2013.01.009. Epub 2013 Feb 1.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

The American Academy of Pediatrics (AAP) recommends that all preterm neonates undergo a period of observation in a car safety seat before discharge, known as the Infant Car Seat Challenge (ICSC), to monitor for respiratory immaturity and the risk of adverse cardiopulmonary events in the upright position. However, no universal guidelines exist to define appropriate cutoffs for failure of the ICSC. We sought to evaluate regional neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) implementation of the ICSC and to evaluate variation in failure criteria.

METHODS

We contacted level II and III nurseries/NICUs in New York/New England (n = 119) to determine if each performed ICSCs, their inclusion criteria, duration of testing, and failure criteria.

RESULTS

We contacted 119 institutions and had an 87% response rate (n = 103). Of the institutions that responded, 89% (n = 89) perform ICSCs. Of these 89 with current protocols, 17% did not follow AAP guidelines to test all neonates born <37 weeks' gestation, and 45% did not follow guidelines for test duration. Despite wide variation, most units use thresholds for bradycardia of <80 bpm and desaturation of <90% to determine failure.

CONCLUSIONS

Despite AAP guidelines, implementation of ICSCs for preterm neonates is not universal in the region studied. Variation in definition of ICSC failure means that neonates are receiving differential care, not on the basis of their clinical characteristics, but on which institution performs the test. We propose standardizing the test to all infants born at <37 weeks' gestation to a duration of at least 90 minutes, along with a failure threshold for bradycardia of <80 bpm for >10 seconds, and for saturation <90% for >10 seconds.

摘要

背景

美国儿科学会(AAP)建议所有早产儿在出院前进行汽车安全座椅观察期,即婴儿汽车座椅挑战(ICSC),以监测呼吸不成熟和直立位不良心肺事件的风险。然而,目前还没有通用的指南来定义 ICSC 失败的适当截止值。我们旨在评估区域新生儿重症监护病房(NICU)实施 ICSC 的情况,并评估失败标准的差异。

方法

我们联系了纽约/新英格兰的二级和三级托儿所/NICU,以确定每个机构是否进行 ICSC、其纳入标准、测试持续时间和失败标准。

结果

我们联系了 119 家机构,获得了 87%的回复率(n=103)。在做出回应的机构中,89%(n=89)进行 ICSC。在这些有现行方案的机构中,17%的机构没有遵循 AAP 指南来测试所有出生胎龄<37 周的新生儿,45%的机构没有遵循测试持续时间的指南。尽管存在广泛的差异,但大多数机构使用<80 bpm 的心动过缓和<90%的饱和度来确定失败的阈值。

结论

尽管有 AAP 指南,但在研究区域,对早产儿进行 ICSC 的实施并不普遍。ICSC 失败定义的差异意味着新生儿接受的护理不同,不是基于他们的临床特征,而是基于进行测试的机构。我们建议将所有出生胎龄<37 周的婴儿标准化测试,持续时间至少 90 分钟,以及<80 bpm 的心动过缓>10 秒和饱和度<90%>10 秒的失败阈值。

相似文献

2
Predictors of Persistent Infant Car Seat Challenge Failure.持续性婴儿汽车座椅挑战失败的预测因素
Adv Neonatal Care. 2017 Dec;17(6):499-508. doi: 10.1097/ANC.0000000000000432.
3
A comparison of the infant car seat challenge and the polysomnogram at the time of hospital discharge.婴儿汽车座椅挑战与出院时多导睡眠图的比较。
Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed. 2013 Sep;98(5):F411-5. doi: 10.1136/archdischild-2012-303244. Epub 2013 Feb 12.
9
Clinical Outcomes Associated with a Failed Infant Car Seat Challenge.与婴儿汽车座椅挑战失败相关的临床结果
J Pediatr. 2017 Jan;180:130-134. doi: 10.1016/j.jpeds.2016.09.072. Epub 2016 Oct 31.

引用本文的文献

9
Sudden unexpected infant deaths associated with car seats.与汽车安全座椅相关的婴儿意外猝死。
Forensic Sci Med Pathol. 2014 Jun;10(2):187-92. doi: 10.1007/s12024-013-9524-5. Epub 2014 Jan 17.
10
Test-retest reliability of the infant car-seat challenge.婴儿汽车座椅挑战的重测信度。
J Perinatol. 2014 Jan;34(1):54-8. doi: 10.1038/jp.2013.118. Epub 2013 Oct 17.

本文引用的文献

1
3
Target ranges of oxygen saturation in extremely preterm infants.极低出生体重儿氧饱和度目标范围。
N Engl J Med. 2010 May 27;362(21):1959-69. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa0911781. Epub 2010 May 16.
4
The infant car seat challenge: determining and managing an "abnormal" result.
Pediatrics. 2010 Mar;125(3):597-8. doi: 10.1542/peds.2009-3344. Epub 2010 Feb 15.
7
"Late-preterm" infants: a population at risk.晚期早产儿:一个高危群体。
Pediatrics. 2007 Dec;120(6):1390-401. doi: 10.1542/peds.2007-2952.

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验