Boston Children's Hospital Division of Newborn Medicine, Boston, MA 02115, USA.
Acad Pediatr. 2013 May-Jun;13(3):272-7. doi: 10.1016/j.acap.2013.01.009. Epub 2013 Feb 1.
The American Academy of Pediatrics (AAP) recommends that all preterm neonates undergo a period of observation in a car safety seat before discharge, known as the Infant Car Seat Challenge (ICSC), to monitor for respiratory immaturity and the risk of adverse cardiopulmonary events in the upright position. However, no universal guidelines exist to define appropriate cutoffs for failure of the ICSC. We sought to evaluate regional neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) implementation of the ICSC and to evaluate variation in failure criteria.
We contacted level II and III nurseries/NICUs in New York/New England (n = 119) to determine if each performed ICSCs, their inclusion criteria, duration of testing, and failure criteria.
We contacted 119 institutions and had an 87% response rate (n = 103). Of the institutions that responded, 89% (n = 89) perform ICSCs. Of these 89 with current protocols, 17% did not follow AAP guidelines to test all neonates born <37 weeks' gestation, and 45% did not follow guidelines for test duration. Despite wide variation, most units use thresholds for bradycardia of <80 bpm and desaturation of <90% to determine failure.
Despite AAP guidelines, implementation of ICSCs for preterm neonates is not universal in the region studied. Variation in definition of ICSC failure means that neonates are receiving differential care, not on the basis of their clinical characteristics, but on which institution performs the test. We propose standardizing the test to all infants born at <37 weeks' gestation to a duration of at least 90 minutes, along with a failure threshold for bradycardia of <80 bpm for >10 seconds, and for saturation <90% for >10 seconds.
美国儿科学会(AAP)建议所有早产儿在出院前进行汽车安全座椅观察期,即婴儿汽车座椅挑战(ICSC),以监测呼吸不成熟和直立位不良心肺事件的风险。然而,目前还没有通用的指南来定义 ICSC 失败的适当截止值。我们旨在评估区域新生儿重症监护病房(NICU)实施 ICSC 的情况,并评估失败标准的差异。
我们联系了纽约/新英格兰的二级和三级托儿所/NICU,以确定每个机构是否进行 ICSC、其纳入标准、测试持续时间和失败标准。
我们联系了 119 家机构,获得了 87%的回复率(n=103)。在做出回应的机构中,89%(n=89)进行 ICSC。在这些有现行方案的机构中,17%的机构没有遵循 AAP 指南来测试所有出生胎龄<37 周的新生儿,45%的机构没有遵循测试持续时间的指南。尽管存在广泛的差异,但大多数机构使用<80 bpm 的心动过缓和<90%的饱和度来确定失败的阈值。
尽管有 AAP 指南,但在研究区域,对早产儿进行 ICSC 的实施并不普遍。ICSC 失败定义的差异意味着新生儿接受的护理不同,不是基于他们的临床特征,而是基于进行测试的机构。我们建议将所有出生胎龄<37 周的婴儿标准化测试,持续时间至少 90 分钟,以及<80 bpm 的心动过缓>10 秒和饱和度<90%>10 秒的失败阈值。