Division of Neonatology, Department of Pediatrics, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA.
Department of Pediatrics, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA.
Pediatr Res. 2023 Mar;93(4):953-958. doi: 10.1038/s41390-022-02161-1. Epub 2022 Jun 25.
The aim of this study was to compare the impact of a semi-upright swing with a standard crib on vital signs in infants in the neonatal intensive care unit (NICU).
We performed a within-subjects' comparison of vital signs of NICU infants corrected to ≥34 weeks of gestation and placed in the supine position versus the semi-upright position in a swing. The primary outcome was the mean oxygen saturation, and the secondary outcomes were the mean heart rate, the proportion of time with oxygen saturation (SpO) <90%, and respiratory rate.
Of the 65 infants, 34 (57%) were male and 32 (50%) were black. The mean ± SD gestational age at birth was 32.4 ± 5.1 weeks. In all, 40% were on noninvasive respiratory support. There were no significant differences in oxygen saturation, heart rate, time with oxygen desaturation defined by SpO < 90%, or respiratory rate between the supine and semi-upright positions. A higher risk of desaturations was observed in infants without respiratory support (RR, 1.24, 95% CI, 1.15-1.33) and low-birth-weight infants (RR, 1.55, 95% CI, 1.42-1.69).
The placement of infants in a semi-upright swing resulted in no discernible differences in averaged vital signs compared to the supine position in NICU infants.
We identified no significant differences in averaged oxygen saturation, heart rate, or respiratory rate among NICU infants placed in a semi-upright swing compared to the supine position. Desaturation events occurred at a higher frequency in low-birth-weight infants and those on room air when placed in the swing, although none required oxygen supplementation. The results from the current study support that it is probably safe to use semi-upright swings in the NICU environment, although additional studies are necessary for generalization to the unmonitored home environment.
本研究旨在比较半直立式摇摆与标准婴儿床对新生儿重症监护病房(NICU)中婴儿生命体征的影响。
我们对纠正胎龄≥34 周并仰卧位放置在摇摆椅中的 NICU 婴儿进行了一项自身对照研究,比较了他们处于半直立位和仰卧位时的生命体征。主要结局指标为平均氧饱和度,次要结局指标为平均心率、氧饱和度(SpO)<90%的时间比例和呼吸频率。
在 65 名婴儿中,34 名(57%)为男性,32 名(50%)为黑人。出生时的平均(±SD)胎龄为 32.4±5.1 周。共有 40%的婴儿接受无创呼吸支持。仰卧位和半直立位时,氧饱和度、心率、SpO<90%的缺氧时间比例和呼吸频率无显著差异。无呼吸支持的婴儿(RR,1.24,95%CI,1.15-1.33)和低出生体重儿(RR,1.55,95%CI,1.42-1.69)发生缺氧的风险更高。
与 NICU 婴儿仰卧位相比,将婴儿放置在半直立式摇椅中对平均生命体征无明显差异。
与仰卧位相比,放置在半直立式摇摆椅中的 NICU 婴儿的平均氧饱和度、心率或呼吸率无显著差异。在摇摆椅中,低出生体重儿和接受空气呼吸的婴儿发生低氧血症的频率更高,但都无需补充氧气。目前的研究结果支持在 NICU 环境中使用半直立式摇摆椅可能是安全的,尽管还需要进一步的研究来推广到无人监测的家庭环境。