Concordia University.
University of Utah.
Child Dev. 2015 May-Jun;86(3):864-76. doi: 10.1111/cdev.12349. Epub 2015 Feb 11.
This study examined children's and adolescents' narrative accounts of everyday experiences when they harmed and helped a friend. The sample included 100 participants divided into three age groups (7-, 11-, and 16-year-olds). Help narratives focused on the helping acts themselves and reasons for helping, whereas harm narratives included more references to consequences of acts and psychological conflicts. With age, however, youth increasingly described the consequences of helping. Reasons for harming others focused especially on the narrator's perspective whereas reasons for helping others were centered on others' perspectives. With age, youth increasingly drew self-related insights from their helpful, but not their harmful, actions. Results illuminate how reflections on prosocial and transgressive experiences may provide distinct opportunities for constructing moral agency.
本研究考察了儿童和青少年在伤害和帮助朋友的日常经历中的叙述。样本包括 100 名参与者,分为三个年龄组(7 岁、11 岁和 16 岁)。帮助叙述集中在帮助行为本身及其原因,而伤害叙述则更多地涉及行为的后果和心理冲突。然而,随着年龄的增长,年轻人越来越多地描述了帮助的后果。伤害他人的原因尤其侧重于叙述者的观点,而帮助他人的原因则以他人的观点为中心。随着年龄的增长,年轻人越来越多地从他们有益的但不是有害的行为中获得自我相关的见解。研究结果阐明了对亲社会和越轨经历的反思如何为构建道德代理提供独特的机会。