Suppr超能文献

犬类的认知领域:工作记忆与物体学习、选择性注意和运动学习的独立性。

Cognitive domains in the dog: independence of working memory from object learning, selective attention, and motor learning.

作者信息

Zanghi Brian M, Araujo Joseph, Milgram Norton W

机构信息

Nestlé Purina Petcare Research, One Checkerboard Square, St Louis, MO, 63164, USA,

出版信息

Anim Cogn. 2015 May;18(3):789-800. doi: 10.1007/s10071-015-0847-3. Epub 2015 Feb 13.

Abstract

Cognition in dogs, like in humans, is not a unitary process. Some functions, such as simple discrimination learning, are relatively insensitive to age; others, such as visuospatial learning can provide behavioral biomarkers of age. The present experiment sought to further establish the relationship between various cognitive domains, namely visuospatial memory, object discrimination learning (ODL), and selective attention (SA). In addition, we also set up a task to assess motor learning (ML). Thirty-six beagles (9-16 years) performed a variable delay non-matching to position (vDNMP) task using two objects with 20- and 90-s delay and were divided into three groups based on a combined score (HMP = 88-93 % accuracy [N = 12]; MMP = 79-86 % accuracy [N = 12]; LMP = 61-78 % accuracy [N = 12]). Variable object oddity task was used to measure ODL (correct or incorrect object) and SA (0-3 incorrect distractor objects with same [SA-same] or different [SA-diff] correct object as ODL). ML involved reaching various distances (0-15 cm). Age did not differ between memory groups (mean 11.6 years). ODL (ANOVA P = 0.43), or SA-same and SA-different (ANOVA P = 0.96), performance did not differ between the three vDNMP groups, although mean errors during ODL was numerically higher for LMP dogs. Errors increased (P < 0.001) for all dogs with increasing number of distractor objects during both SA tasks. vDNMP groups remained different (ANOVA P < 0.001) when re-tested with vDNMP task 42 days later. Maximum ML distance did not differ between vDNMP groups (ANOVA P = 0.96). Impaired short-term memory performance in aged dogs does not appear to predict performance of cognitive domains associated with object learning, SA, or maximum ML distance.

摘要

与人类一样,犬类的认知并非单一过程。某些功能,如简单的辨别学习,对年龄相对不敏感;而其他功能,如视觉空间学习,则可为年龄提供行为生物标志物。本实验旨在进一步确立各种认知领域之间的关系,即视觉空间记忆、物体辨别学习(ODL)和选择性注意(SA)。此外,我们还设置了一项任务来评估运动学习(ML)。三十六只比格犬(9至16岁)使用两个物体进行了可变延迟位置不匹配(vDNMP)任务,延迟时间分别为20秒和90秒,并根据综合得分分为三组(高匹配组 = 88 - 93%准确率 [N = 12];中匹配组 = 79 - 86%准确率 [N = 12];低匹配组 = 61 - 78%准确率 [N = 12])。使用可变物体奇异性任务来测量ODL(正确或错误物体)和SA(与ODL相同 [SA - 相同] 或不同 [SA - 不同] 正确物体的0至3个错误干扰物体)。ML涉及到达不同距离(0至15厘米)。记忆组之间的年龄无差异(平均11.6岁)。ODL(方差分析P = 0.43),或SA - 相同和SA - 不同(方差分析P = 0.96),在三个vDNMP组之间的表现无差异,尽管低匹配组犬在ODL期间的平均错误在数值上更高。在两个SA任务中,随着干扰物体数量增加,所有犬的错误均增加(P < 0.001)。42天后用vDNMP任务重新测试时,vDNMP组仍存在差异(方差分析P < 0.001)。vDNMP组之间的最大ML距离无差异(方差分析P = 0.96)。老年犬短期记忆表现受损似乎无法预测与物体学习、SA或最大ML距离相关的认知领域表现。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验