De Luca Canto G, Pachêco-Pereira C, Lagravere M O, Flores-Mir C, Major P W
Department of Dentistry, Federal University of Santa Catarina, Florianópolis, Brazil; School of Dentistry, Faculty of Medicine and Dentistry, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB, Canada.
Orthod Craniofac Res. 2015 May;18(2):65-76. doi: 10.1111/ocr.12068. Epub 2015 Feb 11.
A systematic review was undertaken to evaluate the validity of intra-arch dimensional measurements made from laser-scanned digital dental models in comparison with measurements directly obtained from the original plaster casts (gold standard). Finally included articles were only those reporting studies that compared measurements from digital models produced from laser scanning against their plaster models. Measurements from the original plaster models should have been made using a manual or digital caliper (gold standard). Articles that used scans from impressions or digital photographs were discarded. Detailed individual search strategies for Cochrane, EMBASE, MEDLINE, PubMed, and LILACS were developed. The references cited in the selected articles were also checked for any references that could have been missed in the electronic database searches. A partial gray literature search was undertaken using Google Scholar. The methodology of selected studies was evaluated using the 14-item quality assessment tool for diagnostic accuracy studies (QUADAS). Only 16 studies were finally included for the qualitative/quantitative synthesis. The selected studies consistently agree that the validity of measurements obtained after using a laser scanner from plaster models is similar to direct measurements. Any stated differences would be unlikely clinically relevant. There is consistent scientific evidence to support the validity of measurements from digital dental models in comparison with intra-arch dimensional measurements directly obtained from them.
进行了一项系统评价,以评估与直接从原始石膏模型(金标准)获得的测量值相比,从激光扫描数字牙科模型进行的牙弓内尺寸测量的有效性。最终纳入的文章仅为那些报告将激光扫描产生的数字模型测量值与其石膏模型测量值进行比较的研究。原始石膏模型的测量应使用手动或数字卡尺(金标准)进行。使用印模扫描或数码照片的文章被排除。针对Cochrane、EMBASE、MEDLINE、PubMed和LILACS制定了详细的单独检索策略。还检查了所选文章中引用的参考文献,以查找电子数据库搜索中可能遗漏的任何参考文献。使用谷歌学术进行了部分灰色文献检索。使用诊断准确性研究的14项质量评估工具(QUADAS)对所选研究的方法进行了评估。最终仅纳入16项研究进行定性/定量综合分析。所选研究一致认为,使用激光扫描仪从石膏模型获得的测量值的有效性与直接测量相似。任何所述差异在临床上都不太可能具有相关性。有一致的科学证据支持与直接从数字牙科模型获得的牙弓内尺寸测量相比,数字牙科模型测量的有效性。