Suppr超能文献

蒙特利尔认知评估量表和HIV痴呆量表在评估HIV-1感染患者认知障碍中的效度

Validity of the Montreal Cognitive Assessment and the HIV Dementia Scale in the assessment of cognitive impairment in HIV-1 infected patients.

作者信息

Janssen M A M, Bosch M, Koopmans P P, Kessels R P C

机构信息

Department of Medical Psychology, Radboud University Nijmegen Medical Center, P.O. Box 9101, 6500 HB, Nijmegen, The Netherlands,

出版信息

J Neurovirol. 2015 Aug;21(4):383-90. doi: 10.1007/s13365-015-0324-4. Epub 2015 Feb 13.

Abstract

The gold standard for evaluating cognitive impairments in HIV-infected patients is to administer an extensive neuropsychological assessment. This may, however, be time-consuming and hence not always feasible in the clinic. Therefore, several brief screening tools have been developed. This study determined the validity of the Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) and the HIV Dementia Scale (HDS) in detecting cognitive impairment using both the Frascati and cognitive impairment, no dementia (CIND) criteria to classify cognitive impairment in HIV-1 infected patients. The MoCA, HDS, and an extensive neuropsychological assessment, covering nine cognitive domains, were administered in a group of 102 HIV-infected patients who were all on cART and virologically suppressed for at least 1 year. Results show that the areas under the curve (AUCs) for both the MoCA and the HDS were statistically significant, using both the Frascati and the CIND criteria as gold standard. However, the AUCs for the MoCA and HDS did not differ significantly, regardless of the used classification criteria (Frascati: z = 0.37, p = 0.35; CIND: z = -0.62, p = 0.27). Sensitivity of both the MoCA and HDS were low for the recommended cutoff scores (Frascati: MoCA (<26) = 0.56, HDS (<11) = 0.26; CIND: MoCA (<26) = 0.55, HDS (<11) = 0.36). Cutoff scores with good sensitivity and adequate specificity could not be determined for both screening instruments. Therefore, the HDS and MoCA are not recommended as sole instruments to diagnose HIV-associated cognitive impairment.

摘要

评估HIV感染患者认知障碍的金标准是进行全面的神经心理学评估。然而,这可能耗时较长,因此在临床中并不总是可行。所以,已经开发了几种简短的筛查工具。本研究使用弗拉斯卡蒂标准和无痴呆的认知障碍(CIND)标准来对HIV-1感染患者的认知障碍进行分类,以确定蒙特利尔认知评估量表(MoCA)和HIV痴呆量表(HDS)在检测认知障碍方面的有效性。对一组102名接受抗逆转录病毒治疗(cART)且病毒学抑制至少1年的HIV感染患者进行了MoCA、HDS评估以及涵盖九个认知领域的全面神经心理学评估。结果显示,以弗拉斯卡蒂标准和CIND标准作为金标准时,MoCA和HDS的曲线下面积(AUC)均具有统计学意义。然而,无论使用何种分类标准,MoCA和HDS的AUC差异均无统计学意义(弗拉斯卡蒂标准:z = 0.37,p = 0.35;CIND标准:z = -0.62,p = 0.27)。对于推荐的临界值分数,MoCA和HDS的敏感性均较低(弗拉斯卡蒂标准:MoCA(<26)= 0.56,HDS(<11)= 0.26;CIND标准:MoCA(<26)= 0.55,HDS(<11)= 0.36)。两种筛查工具均无法确定具有良好敏感性和足够特异性的临界值分数。因此,不建议将HDS和MoCA作为诊断HIV相关认知障碍的唯一工具。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验