Fitzpatrick Scott J, Kerridge Ian H, Jordens Christopher F C, Zoloth Laurie, Tollefsen Christopher, Tsomo Karma Lekshe, Jensen Michael P, Sachedina Abdulaziz, Sarma Deepak
Centre for Rural and Remote Mental Health, University of Newcastle, Bloomfield Campus, Locked Bag 6005, Orange, NSW, 2800, Australia.
Centre for Values, Ethics and the Law in Medicine (VELiM), University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia.
J Relig Health. 2016 Feb;55(1):159-173. doi: 10.1007/s10943-015-0014-9.
The prevention and relief of suffering has long been a core medical concern. But while this is a laudable goal, some question whether medicine can, or should, aim for a world without pain, sadness, anxiety, despair or uncertainty. To explore these issues, we invited experts from six of the world's major faith traditions to address the following question. Is there value in suffering? And is something lost in the prevention and/or relief of suffering? While each of the perspectives provided maintains that suffering should be alleviated and that medicine's proper role is to prevent and relieve suffering by ethical means, it is also apparent that questions regarding the meaning and value of suffering are beyond the realm of medicine. These perspectives suggest that medicine and bioethics have much to gain from respectful consideration of religious discourse surrounding suffering.
预防和减轻痛苦长期以来一直是医学的核心关注点。然而,尽管这是一个值得称赞的目标,但有些人质疑医学是否能够或应该致力于创造一个没有痛苦、悲伤、焦虑、绝望或不确定性的世界。为了探讨这些问题,我们邀请了世界六大主要宗教传统的专家来回答以下问题。苦难有价值吗?在预防和/或减轻苦难的过程中会失去什么吗?虽然所提供的每种观点都认为应该减轻苦难,并且医学的恰当作用是以合乎道德的方式预防和减轻苦难,但关于苦难的意义和价值的问题显然超出了医学领域。这些观点表明,医学和生物伦理学能够从对围绕苦难的宗教论述的尊重性思考中受益匪浅。