Byrd Courtney T, McGill Megann, Usler Evan
The University of Texas at Austin, United States.
The University of Texas at Austin, United States.
J Fluency Disord. 2015 Jun;44:17-31. doi: 10.1016/j.jfludis.2015.01.004. Epub 2015 Jan 24.
The purpose of the present study was to enhance our understanding of phonological working memory in adults who stutter through the comparison of nonvocal versus vocal nonword repetition and phoneme elision task performance differences.
For the vocal nonword repetition condition, participants repeated sets of 4- and 7-syllable nonwords (n=12 per set). For the nonvocal nonword repetition condition, participants silently identified each target nonword from a subsequent set of three nonwords. For the vocal phoneme elision condition, participants repeated nonwords with a target phoneme eliminated. For the nonvocal phoneme elision condition, participants silently identified the nonword with the designated target phoneme eliminated from a subsequent set of three nonwords.
Adults who stutter produced significantly fewer accurate initial productions of 7-syllable nonwords compared to adults who do not stutter. There were no talker group differences for the silent identification of nonwords, but both talker groups required significantly more mean number of attempts to accurately silently identify 7-syllable as compared to 4-syllable nonwords. For the vocal phoneme elision condition, adults who stutter were significantly less accurate than adults who do not stutter in their initial production and required a significantly higher mean number of attempts to accurately produce 7-syllable nonwords with a phoneme eliminated. This talker group difference was also significant for the nonvocal phoneme elision condition for both 4- and 7-syllable nonwords.
Present findings suggest phonological working memory may contribute to the difficulties persons who stutter have establishing and/or maintaining fluent speech.
(a) Readers can describe the role of phonological working memory in planning for and execution of speech; (b) readers can describe two experimental tasks for exploring the phonological working memory: nonword repetition and phoneme elision; (c) readers can describe how the nonword repetition and phoneme elision skills of adults who stutter differ from their typically fluent peers.
本研究的目的是通过比较无声与有声非词重复以及音素省略任务表现差异,增强我们对口吃成年人语音工作记忆的理解。
在有声非词重复条件下,参与者重复4音节和7音节非词组(每组n = 12)。在无声非词重复条件下,参与者从随后的三个非词组中默默识别每个目标非词。在有声音素省略条件下,参与者重复去除目标音素的非词。在无声音素省略条件下,参与者从随后的三个非词组中默默识别去除指定目标音素的非词。
与不口吃的成年人相比,口吃的成年人准确发出7音节非词的初始发音明显更少。在默默识别非词方面,两组之间没有差异,但与4音节非词相比,两组在准确默默识别7音节非词时平均尝试次数都显著更多。在有声音素省略条件下,口吃的成年人在初始发音时的准确性明显低于不口吃的成年人,并且在准确发出去除一个音素的7音节非词时平均尝试次数显著更高。对于4音节和7音节非词,这种说话者组间差异在无声音素省略条件下也很显著。
目前的研究结果表明,语音工作记忆可能导致口吃者在建立和/或维持流畅言语方面存在困难。
(a)读者能够描述语音工作记忆在言语规划和执行中的作用;(b)读者能够描述两种探索语音工作记忆的实验任务:非词重复和音素省略;(c)读者能够描述口吃成年人的非词重复和音素省略技能与通常言语流畅的同龄人有何不同。