• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

10 年来,新加坡与提高院外心脏骤停患者生存率相关的介入策略。

Interventional strategies associated with improvements in survival for out-of-hospital cardiac arrests in Singapore over 10 years.

机构信息

Duke-NUS Graduate School of Medicine, Singapore.

Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University Health System, Singapore, Singapore.

出版信息

Resuscitation. 2015 Apr;89:155-61. doi: 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2015.01.034. Epub 2015 Feb 11.

DOI:10.1016/j.resuscitation.2015.01.034
PMID:25680822
Abstract

AIM

We aim to study if there has been an improvement in survival for Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest (OHCA) in Singapore, the effects of various interventional strategies over the past 10 years, and identify strategies that contributed to improved survival.

METHODS

Rates of OHCA survival were compared between 2001-2004 and 2010-2012, using nationwide data for all OHCA presenting to EMS and public hospitals. A multivariate logistic regression model for survival to discharge was constructed to identify strategies with significant impact.

RESULTS

A total of 5453 cases were included, 2428 cases from 2001 to 2004 and 3025 cases from 2010 to 2012. There was significant improvement in Utstein (witnessed, shockable) survival to discharge from 2001-2004 (2.5%) to 2010-2012 (11.0%), adjusted odds ratio (OR) 9.6 [95% CI: 2.2-41.9]). Overall survival to discharge increased from 1.6% to 3.2% (adjusted OR 2.2 [1.5-3.3]). Bystander CPR rates increased from 19.7% to 22.4% (p=0.02). The multivariate regression model (adjusted for important non-modifiable risk factors) showed that response time <8min (OR 1.5 [1.0-2.3]), bystander AED (OR 5.8 [2.0-16.2]), and post-resuscitation hypothermia (OR 30.0 [11.5-78.0]) were significantly associated with survival to hospital discharge. Conversely, pre-hospital epinephrine (OR 0.6 [0.4-0.9]) was associated negatively with survival.

CONCLUSIONS

OHCA survival has improved in Singapore over the past 10 years. Improvement in response time, public AEDs and post-resuscitation hypothermia appear to have contributed to the increase in survival. Singapore's experience might suggest that developing EMS systems should focus on reducing times to basic life support, including bystander defibrillation and post-resuscitation care.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在探讨新加坡院外心脏骤停(OHCA)患者生存率的变化,以及过去 10 年中各种干预策略的效果,并确定提高生存率的策略。

方法

利用全国范围内所有因 OHCA 被 EMS 和公立医院收治的患者数据,比较 2001-2004 年和 2010-2012 年 OHCA 患者的生存率。构建了一个用于出院生存率的多变量逻辑回归模型,以确定具有显著影响的策略。

结果

共纳入 5453 例患者,其中 2001-2004 年 2428 例,2010-2012 年 3025 例。乌斯泰因(目击者、可电击)出院生存率从 2001-2004 年的 2.5%显著提高至 2010-2012 年的 11.0%,调整后的优势比(OR)为 9.6(95%CI:2.2-41.9)。总体出院生存率从 1.6%提高至 3.2%(调整后的 OR 为 2.2(1.5-3.3))。旁观者心肺复苏(CPR)率从 19.7%提高至 22.4%(p=0.02)。多变量回归模型(调整了重要的不可改变的风险因素)显示,反应时间<8min(OR 1.5[1.0-2.3])、旁观者 AED(OR 5.8[2.0-16.2])和复苏后低体温(OR 30.0[11.5-78.0])与出院生存率显著相关。相反,院前肾上腺素(OR 0.6[0.4-0.9])与生存率呈负相关。

结论

在过去 10 年中,新加坡 OHCA 患者的生存率有所提高。反应时间、公众 AED 和复苏后低体温的改善似乎是生存率提高的原因。新加坡的经验表明,发展 EMS 系统应侧重于缩短基本生命支持的时间,包括旁观者除颤和复苏后护理。

相似文献

1
Interventional strategies associated with improvements in survival for out-of-hospital cardiac arrests in Singapore over 10 years.10 年来,新加坡与提高院外心脏骤停患者生存率相关的介入策略。
Resuscitation. 2015 Apr;89:155-61. doi: 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2015.01.034. Epub 2015 Feb 11.
2
Comparison of out-of-hospital cardiac arrest occurring before and after paramedic arrival: epidemiology, survival to hospital discharge and 12-month functional recovery.比较急救人员到达前后的院外心脏骤停:流行病学、存活至出院和 12 个月的功能恢复。
Resuscitation. 2015 Apr;89:50-7. doi: 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2015.01.012. Epub 2015 Jan 22.
3
Traumatic out-of-hospital cardiac arrests in Melbourne, Australia.澳大利亚墨尔本院外创伤性心搏骤停。
Resuscitation. 2012 Apr;83(4):465-70. doi: 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2011.09.025. Epub 2011 Oct 10.
4
Association of Bystander Interventions With Neurologically Intact Survival Among Patients With Bystander-Witnessed Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest in Japan.日本旁观者目击院外心脏骤停患者中旁观者干预与神经功能完整存活的关联。
JAMA. 2015 Jul 21;314(3):247-54. doi: 10.1001/jama.2015.8068.
5
Implementation of a National 5-Year Plan for Prehospital Emergency Care in Singapore and Impact on Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest Outcomes From 2011 to 2016.新加坡实施国家 5 年院前急救计划及对 2011 至 2016 年院外心脏骤停结局的影响
J Am Heart Assoc. 2020 Nov 3;9(21):e015368. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.119.015368. Epub 2020 Oct 26.
6
Comparison of Outcomes and Characteristics of Emergency Medical Services (EMS)-Witnessed, Bystander-Witnessed, and Unwitnessed Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrests in Singapore.新加坡院外心脏骤停中急救医疗服务(EMS)见证、旁观者见证和无见证者的结局和特征比较。
Prehosp Emerg Care. 2019 Nov-Dec;23(6):847-854. doi: 10.1080/10903127.2019.1587124. Epub 2019 Mar 27.
7
Differential survival for men and women from out-of-hospital cardiac arrest varies by age: results from the OPALS study.院外心脏骤停患者中男性和女性的生存差异因年龄而异:OPALS研究结果
Acad Emerg Med. 2014 Dec;21(12):1503-11. doi: 10.1111/acem.12540.
8
Association of Bystander and First-Responder Intervention With Survival After Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest in North Carolina, 2010-2013.北卡罗来纳州 2010-2013 年院外心脏骤停后旁观者和急救者干预与生存的相关性。
JAMA. 2015 Jul 21;314(3):255-64. doi: 10.1001/jama.2015.7938.
9
Outcomes for out-of-hospital cardiac arrests across 7 countries in Asia: The Pan Asian Resuscitation Outcomes Study (PAROS).亚洲 7 国院外心脏骤停结局研究(PAROS)。
Resuscitation. 2015 Nov;96:100-8. doi: 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2015.07.026. Epub 2015 Jul 30.
10
Effectiveness of a community based out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) interventional bundle: Results of a pilot study.基于社区的院外心脏骤停(OHCA)干预捆绑包的有效性:一项试点研究的结果。
Resuscitation. 2020 Jan 1;146:220-228. doi: 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2019.10.015. Epub 2019 Nov 14.

引用本文的文献

1
Systematic Review on the Worldwide Disparities in the Frequency and Results of Emergency Medical Services (EMS) and Response to Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest (OHCA).全球紧急医疗服务(EMS)频率及结果与院外心脏骤停(OHCA)应对情况的差异的系统评价
Cureus. 2024 Jun 27;16(6):e63300. doi: 10.7759/cureus.63300. eCollection 2024 Jun.
2
Comparative Analysis of Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest Outcomes in Health Clinics, Nursing Homes, and Public Places: Implications for Optimizing Automated External Defibrillator Strategies.健康诊所、养老院和公共场所院外心脏骤停结局的比较分析:对优化自动体外除颤器策略的启示
Int J Gen Med. 2024 May 18;17:2241-2249. doi: 10.2147/IJGM.S464936. eCollection 2024.
3
Designing, development and validation of an app to reduce the response time of the emergency medical services.
设计、开发和验证一款应用程序,以缩短紧急医疗服务的响应时间。
PLoS One. 2024 Mar 25;19(3):e0299828. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0299828. eCollection 2024.
4
Impact of community-based interventions on out-of-hospital cardiac arrest outcomes: a systematic review and meta-analysis.基于社区的干预对院外心脏骤停结局的影响:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Sci Rep. 2023 Jun 23;13(1):10231. doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-35735-y.
5
Clinicopathological correlates of out-of-hospital cardiac arrests.院外心脏骤停的临床病理相关性
J Arrhythm. 2022 Mar 29;38(3):416-424. doi: 10.1002/joa3.12705. eCollection 2022 Jun.
6
An essential review of Singapore's response to out-of-hospital cardiac arrests: improvements over a ten-year period.新加坡院外心脏骤停反应的重要回顾:十年间的改进。
Singapore Med J. 2021 Aug;62(8):438-443. doi: 10.11622/smedj.2021114.
7
A national population-based study of patients, bystanders and contextual factors associated with resuscitation in witnessed cardiac arrest: insight from the french RéAC registry.一项基于全国人群的研究,探讨了目击心搏骤停患者、旁观者和相关环境因素与复苏之间的关系:来自法国 RéAC 注册研究的见解。
BMC Public Health. 2021 Dec 2;21(1):2202. doi: 10.1186/s12889-021-12269-4.
8
Assessing unrealised potential for organ donation after out-of-hospital cardiac arrest.评估院外心搏骤停后器官捐献的未实现潜力。
Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med. 2021 Jul 28;29(1):105. doi: 10.1186/s13049-021-00924-z.
9
A hypothetical implementation of 'Termination of Resuscitation' protocol for out-of-hospital cardiac arrest.院外心脏骤停“终止复苏”方案的一种假设性实施情况。
Resusc Plus. 2021 Mar 3;6:100092. doi: 10.1016/j.resplu.2021.100092. eCollection 2021 Jun.
10
Interim Singapore guidelines for basic and advanced life support for paediatric patients with suspected or confirmed COVID-19.新加坡临时指南:疑似或确诊 COVID-19 的儿科患者基本及高级生命支持
Singapore Med J. 2022 Aug;63(8):419-425. doi: 10.11622/smedj.2021014. Epub 2021 Mar 12.