Silva Marcella Braga, Ferreira Fabienne Antunes, Garcia Luize Neli Nunes, Silva-Carvalho Maria Cícera, Botelho Larissa Alvarenga Batista, Figueiredo Agnes Marie Sá, Vieira-da-Motta Olney
Laboratory of Animal Health, Infectious Disease Department, Science Centre and Agricultural Technologies, State University of Norte Fluminense Darcy Ribeiro, Campos dos Goytacazes, Rio de Janeiro State, Brazil (Silva, Garcia, Vieira-da-Motta)The Laboratory of Bacterial Molecular Biology, Microbiology Department, Institute of Microbiology Paulo de Góes, Health Science Centre, Federal University of Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro State, Brazil (Ferreira, Silva-Carvalho, Botelho, Figueiredo).
Laboratory of Animal Health, Infectious Disease Department, Science Centre and Agricultural Technologies, State University of Norte Fluminense Darcy Ribeiro, Campos dos Goytacazes, Rio de Janeiro State, Brazil (Silva, Garcia, Vieira-da-Motta)The Laboratory of Bacterial Molecular Biology, Microbiology Department, Institute of Microbiology Paulo de Góes, Health Science Centre, Federal University of Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro State, Brazil (Ferreira, Silva-Carvalho, Botelho, Figueiredo)
J Vet Diagn Invest. 2015 Mar;27(2):231-5. doi: 10.1177/1040638715573297. Epub 2015 Feb 13.
It has been proposed, based on taxonomic and molecular studies, that all canine isolates belonging to Staphylococcus intermedius group (SIG) should be renamed Staphylococcus pseudintermedius. However, isolates of SIG and other coagulase-positive staphylococci share many phenotypic characteristics, which could lead to misidentification. The accuracy of matrix-assisted laser desorption ionization time-of-flight mass spectrometry (MALDI-TOF MS) for identifying S. pseudintermedius isolates obtained from canine infections was evaluated, using a polymerase chain reaction (PCR)-based identification as the gold standard. In addition, MALDI-TOF MS was compared with conventional biochemical tests. A central problem was the incorrect identification of S. pseudintermedius isolates as S. intermedius by either MALDI-TOF MS or biochemical identification. From the 49 S. pseudintermedius isolates identified by the molecular method, only 21 could be assigned to this species by the biochemical approach and only 12 by MALDI-TOF MS. The 6 S. aureus isolates were correctly identified by all 3 techniques. However, using biochemical tests, 9 S. pseudintermedius were mistakenly classified as S. aureus, indicating a reduced specificity relative to the MALDI-TOF MS system. Analysis with the MALDI-TOF MS platform allowed rapid and accurate identification of the 49 isolates to the S. intermedius group but the approach was very limited in identifying S. pseudintermedius isolates, as only 12 of 49 isolates were correctly identified, a sensitivity of 0.24 (95% confidence interval: 0.13-0.39).
基于分类学和分子研究,有人提出所有属于中间葡萄球菌群(SIG)的犬类分离株都应重新命名为伪中间葡萄球菌。然而,SIG分离株和其他凝固酶阳性葡萄球菌具有许多表型特征,这可能导致错误鉴定。以基于聚合酶链反应(PCR)的鉴定作为金标准,评估了基质辅助激光解吸电离飞行时间质谱(MALDI-TOF MS)对从犬类感染中获得的伪中间葡萄球菌分离株进行鉴定的准确性。此外,还将MALDI-TOF MS与传统生化试验进行了比较。一个核心问题是通过MALDI-TOF MS或生化鉴定将伪中间葡萄球菌分离株错误鉴定为中间葡萄球菌。在通过分子方法鉴定的49株伪中间葡萄球菌分离株中,通过生化方法只能将21株归为此种,通过MALDI-TOF MS只能鉴定出12株。所有3种技术都正确鉴定出了6株金黄色葡萄球菌分离株。然而,使用生化试验时,有9株伪中间葡萄球菌被错误地归类为金黄色葡萄球菌,这表明相对于MALDI-TOF MS系统,其特异性降低。使用MALDI-TOF MS平台进行分析能够快速准确地将49株分离株鉴定到中间葡萄球菌群,但该方法在鉴定伪中间葡萄球菌分离株方面非常有限,因为49株分离株中只有12株被正确鉴定,灵敏度为0.24(95%置信区间:0.13 - 0.39)。