Suppr超能文献

容积CT图像可改善放射影像解读技能的测试。

Volumetric CT-images improve testing of radiological image interpretation skills.

作者信息

Ravesloot Cécile J, van der Schaaf Marieke F, van Schaik Jan P J, ten Cate Olle Th J, van der Gijp Anouk, Mol Christian P, Vincken Koen L

机构信息

Radiology Department at University Medical Center Utrecht, Heidelberglaan 100, 3508 GA Utrecht, Room E01.132, The Netherlands.

Department of Pedagogical and Educational Sciences at Utrecht University, Heidelberglaan 1, 3584 CS Utrecht, The Netherlands.

出版信息

Eur J Radiol. 2015 May;84(5):856-61. doi: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2014.12.015. Epub 2015 Jan 20.

Abstract

RATIONALE AND OBJECTIVES

Current radiology practice increasingly involves interpretation of volumetric data sets. In contrast, most radiology tests still contain only 2D images. We introduced a new testing tool that allows for stack viewing of volumetric images in our undergraduate radiology program. We hypothesized that tests with volumetric CT-images enhance test quality, in comparison with traditional completely 2D image-based tests, because they might better reflect required skills for clinical practice.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Two groups of medical students (n=139; n=143), trained with 2D and volumetric CT-images, took a digital radiology test in two versions (A and B), each containing both 2D and volumetric CT-image questions. In a questionnaire, they were asked to comment on the representativeness for clinical practice, difficulty and user-friendliness of the test questions and testing program. Students' test scores and reliabilities, measured with Cronbach's alpha, of 2D and volumetric CT-image tests were compared.

RESULTS

Estimated reliabilities (Cronbach's alphas) were higher for volumetric CT-image scores (version A: .51 and version B: .54), than for 2D CT-image scores (version A: .24 and version B: .37). Participants found volumetric CT-image tests more representative of clinical practice, and considered them to be less difficult than volumetric CT-image questions. However, in one version (A), volumetric CT-image scores (M 80.9, SD 14.8) were significantly lower than 2D CT-image scores (M 88.4, SD 10.4) (p<.001). The volumetric CT-image testing program was considered user-friendly.

CONCLUSION

This study shows that volumetric image questions can be successfully integrated in students' radiology testing. Results suggests that the inclusion of volumetric CT-images might improve the quality of radiology tests by positively impacting perceived representativeness for clinical practice and increasing reliability of the test.

摘要

原理与目的

当前放射学实践越来越多地涉及对容积数据集的解读。相比之下,大多数放射学检查仍仅包含二维图像。我们在本科放射学课程中引入了一种新的测试工具,该工具可实现对容积图像的堆叠查看。我们假设,与传统的完全基于二维图像的测试相比,使用容积CT图像的测试能提高测试质量,因为它们可能能更好地反映临床实践所需技能。

材料与方法

两组医学生(n = 139;n = 143)分别接受二维和容积CT图像培训,他们参加了两个版本(A和B)的数字放射学测试,每个版本都包含二维和容积CT图像问题。在一份问卷中,要求他们对测试问题和测试程序在临床实践中的代表性、难度和用户友好性发表评论。比较了医学生二维和容积CT图像测试的成绩以及用克朗巴哈系数测量的信度。

结果

容积CT图像成绩的估计信度(克朗巴哈系数)(版本A:0.51,版本B:0.54)高于二维CT图像成绩(版本A:0.24,版本B:0.37)。参与者认为容积CT图像测试更能代表临床实践,并且认为它们比二维CT图像问题难度更小。然而,在一个版本(A)中,容积CT图像成绩(M = 80.9,SD = 14.8)显著低于二维CT图像成绩(M = 88.4,SD = 10.4)(p < 0.001)。容积CT图像测试程序被认为用户友好。

结论

本研究表明,容积图像问题可以成功地整合到学生的放射学测试中。结果表明,纳入容积CT图像可能通过积极影响对临床实践的感知代表性和提高测试的信度来提高放射学测试的质量。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验