Suppr超能文献

容积成像和二维图像解读在学习者中显示出不同的认知过程。

Volumetric and two-dimensional image interpretation show different cognitive processes in learners.

作者信息

van der Gijp Anouk, Ravesloot Cécile J, van der Schaaf Marieke F, van der Schaaf Irene C, Huige Josephine C B M, Vincken Koen L, Ten Cate Olle Th J, van Schaik Jan P J

机构信息

Department of Radiology, UMC Utrecht, E01.132, Heidelberglaan 100, 3584 CX Utrecht, The Netherlands.

Department of Radiology, UMC Utrecht, E01.132, Heidelberglaan 100, 3584 CX Utrecht, The Netherlands.

出版信息

Acad Radiol. 2015 May;22(5):632-9. doi: 10.1016/j.acra.2015.01.001. Epub 2015 Feb 20.

Abstract

RATIONALE AND OBJECTIVES

In current practice, radiologists interpret digital images, including a substantial amount of volumetric images. We hypothesized that interpretation of a stack of a volumetric data set demands different skills than interpretation of two-dimensional (2D) cross-sectional images. This study aimed to investigate and compare knowledge and skills used for interpretation of volumetric versus 2D images.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Twenty radiology clerks were asked to think out loud while reading four or five volumetric computed tomography (CT) images in stack mode and four or five 2D CT images. Cases were presented in a digital testing program allowing stack viewing of volumetric data sets and changing views and window settings. Thoughts verbalized by the participants were registered and coded by a framework of knowledge and skills concerning three components: perception, analysis, and synthesis. The components were subdivided into 16 discrete knowledge and skill elements. A within-subject analysis was performed to compare cognitive processes during volumetric image readings versus 2D cross-sectional image readings.

RESULTS

Most utterances contained knowledge and skills concerning perception (46%). A smaller part involved synthesis (31%) and analysis (23%). More utterances regarded perception in volumetric image interpretation than in 2D image interpretation (Median 48% vs 35%; z = -3.9; P < .001). Synthesis was less prominent in volumetric than in 2D image interpretation (Median 28% vs 42%; z = -3.9; P < .001). No differences were found in analysis utterances.

CONCLUSIONS

Cognitive processes in volumetric and 2D cross-sectional image interpretation differ substantially. Volumetric image interpretation draws predominantly on perceptual processes, whereas 2D image interpretation is mainly characterized by synthesis. The results encourage the use of volumetric images for teaching and testing perceptual skills.

摘要

原理与目的

在当前的实践中,放射科医生解读数字图像,其中包括大量的容积图像。我们假设,解读一组容积数据集所需的技能与解读二维(2D)横断面图像所需的技能不同。本研究旨在调查和比较解读容积图像与2D图像所使用的知识和技能。

材料与方法

要求20名放射科文员在以堆叠模式阅读四或五幅容积计算机断层扫描(CT)图像以及四或五幅2D CT图像时大声说出想法。病例通过一个数字测试程序呈现,该程序允许以堆叠方式查看容积数据集,并可更改视图和窗口设置。参与者说出的想法由一个关于三个组成部分(感知、分析和综合)的知识和技能框架进行记录和编码。这些组成部分又细分为16个离散的知识和技能元素。进行了一项受试者内分析,以比较容积图像阅读与2D横断面图像阅读过程中的认知过程。

结果

大多数话语包含与感知相关的知识和技能(46%)。涉及综合的部分较少(31%),分析的部分较少(23%)。与2D图像解读相比,容积图像解读中涉及感知的话语更多(中位数48%对35%;z = -3.9;P <.001)。综合在容积图像解读中不如在2D图像解读中突出(中位数28%对42%;z = -3.9;P <.001)。在分析话语方面未发现差异。

结论

容积图像和2D横断面图像解读中的认知过程存在显著差异。容积图像解读主要依赖于感知过程,而2D图像解读主要以综合为特征。这些结果鼓励在教学和测试感知技能时使用容积图像。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验