Stake Christine E, Talbert Patricia Y, Hopkinson William J, Daley Robert J, Alden Kris J, Domb Benjamin G
Hinsdale Orthopaedics, American Hip Institute in Westmont, Westmont, Illinois; University of Phoenix, Phoenix, Arizona.
University of Phoenix, Phoenix, Arizona.
J Arthroplasty. 2015 Jun;30(6):950-4. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2015.01.032. Epub 2015 Jan 23.
The two main treatment options for total hip arthroplasty (THA), medical management and surgical intervention, have advantages and disadvantages, creating a challenging decision. Treatment decisions are further complicated in a younger population (≤50) as the potential need for revision surgery is probable. We examined the relationship of selected variables to the decision-making process for younger patients with symptomatic OA. Thirty-five participants chose surgical intervention and 36 selected medical management for their current treatment. Pain, activity restrictions, and total WOMAC scores were statistically significant (P < .05) for patients selecting surgical intervention. No difference in quality of life was shown between groups. Pain was the only predictor variable identified, however, activity restrictions were also influential variables as these were highly correlated with pain.
全髋关节置换术(THA)的两种主要治疗选择,即药物治疗和手术干预,都各有优缺点,这使得做出决策具有挑战性。对于较年轻的人群(≤50岁),治疗决策会更加复杂,因为可能需要进行翻修手术。我们研究了选定变量与有症状的骨关节炎年轻患者决策过程之间的关系。35名参与者选择了手术干预作为当前治疗方法,36名选择了药物治疗。对于选择手术干预的患者,疼痛、活动受限和WOMAC总分具有统计学意义(P < .05)。两组之间在生活质量方面没有差异。疼痛是唯一确定的预测变量,然而,活动受限也是有影响的变量,因为它们与疼痛高度相关。