Duhamel Patrick, Suberbielle Caroline, Grimbert Philippe, Leclerc Thomas, Jacquelinet Christian, Audry Benoit, Bargues Laurent, Charron Dominique, Bey Eric, Lantieri Laurent, Hivelin Mikael
Service de Chirurgie Plastique, Centre de Traitement des Brûlés, Hôpital d'Instruction des Armées Percy, Clamart Cedex, France.
Transpl Int. 2015 May;28(5):582-93. doi: 10.1111/tri.12540. Epub 2015 Feb 26.
Extensively burned patients receive iterative blood transfusions and skin allografts that often lead to HLA sensitization, and potentially impede access to vascularized composite allotransplantation (VCA). In this retrospective, single-center study, anti-HLA sensitization was measured by single-antigen-flow bead analysis in patients with deep, second- and third-degree burns over ≥40% total body surface area (TBSA). Association of HLA sensitization with blood transfusions, skin allografts, and pregnancies was analyzed by bivariate analysis. The eligibility for transplantation was assessed using calculated panel reactive antibodies (cPRA). Twenty-nine patients aged 32 ± 14 years, including 11 women, presented with a mean burned TBSA of 54 ± 11%. Fifteen patients received skin allografts, comprising those who received cryopreserved (n = 3) or glycerol-preserved (n = 7) allografts, or both (n = 5). An average 36 ± 13 packed red blood cell (PRBC) units were transfused per patient. In sera samples collected 38 ± 13 months after the burns, all patients except one presented with anti-HLA antibodies, of which 13 patients (45%) had complement-fixing antibodies. Eighteen patients (62%) were considered highly sensitized (cPRA≥85%). Cryopreserved, but not glycerol-preserved skin allografts, history of pregnancy, and number of PRBC units were associated with HLA sensitization. Extensively burned patients may become highly HLA sensitized during acute care and hence not qualify for VCA. Alternatives to skin allografts might help preserve their later access to VCA.
大面积烧伤患者需反复输血和接受皮肤异体移植,这常常导致HLA致敏,进而可能阻碍其接受血管化复合异体移植(VCA)。在这项回顾性单中心研究中,通过单抗原流式微珠分析测定了全身表面积(TBSA)≥40%的深二度和三度烧伤患者的抗HLA致敏情况。通过双变量分析研究了HLA致敏与输血、皮肤异体移植和妊娠之间的关联。使用计算得出的群体反应性抗体(cPRA)评估移植资格。29例年龄为32±14岁的患者,其中包括11名女性,平均烧伤TBSA为54±11%。15例患者接受了皮肤异体移植,包括接受冷冻保存(n = 3)或甘油保存(n = 7)异体移植的患者,或两者都接受的患者(n = 5)。每位患者平均输注了36±13个单位的浓缩红细胞(PRBC)。在烧伤后38±13个月采集的血清样本中,除1例患者外,所有患者均出现抗HLA抗体,其中13例患者(45%)具有补体固定抗体。18例患者(62%)被认为高度致敏(cPRA≥85%)。冷冻保存而非甘油保存的皮肤异体移植、妊娠史和PRBC单位数量与HLA致敏有关。大面积烧伤患者在急性治疗期间可能会出现高度HLA致敏,因此不符合VCA的条件。皮肤异体移植的替代方法可能有助于他们日后获得VCA。