Ghani Abdul, Delnoy Peter Paul H M, Adiyaman Ahmet, Ottervanger Jan Paul, Ramdat Misier Anand R, Smit Jaap Jan J, Elvan Arif
Department of Cardiology, Isala Hospital, Zwolle, the Netherlands.
Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 2015 Apr;38(4):455-64. doi: 10.1111/pace.12589. Epub 2015 Feb 14.
Response to cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) is still difficult to predict with previously investigated dyssynchrony indices. The predictive value of speckle tracking strain analysis has not been fully delineated yet. The objective of this study was to assess the predictive value of longitudinal strain (LS) and radial strain (RS) speckle tracking measurements on echocardiographic and clinical response to CRT.
A total of 138 consecutive patients with functional class II-IV heart failure who underwent CRT were studied. Echocardiography was performed at baseline and during follow-up. Six different time-based left ventricular (LV)-dyssynchrony indices were measured with LS and RS. Echocardiographic response to CRT was defined as a reduction in LV end-systolic volume ≥15% and clinical response as survival without heart failure hospitalization. Multivariable analyses were performed to adjust for potential confounding factors.
Echocardiographic and clinical follow-up was 22 ± 8 and 42 ± 8 months, respectively. Ninety-six patients (70%) were classified as echocardiographic responders and 114 patients (83%) survived without heart failure hospitalization. QRS duration and nonischemic etiology predicted echocardiographic response to CRT. None of the speckle tracking indices was different between echocardiographic responders and nonresponders to CRT. Regarding clinical response, only maximal delay between six segments in four-chamber view measured with LS was different between responders and nonresponders, with 154-ms delay as the optimal cut-off value. Neither stratified analyses in patients with sinus rhythm nor multivariable analyses did change these findings.
Of all time-based measured speckle tracking indices, only maximal delay between six segments in four-chamber view as assessed with LS was associated with clinical response to CRT.
对于心脏再同步治疗(CRT)的反应,使用先前研究的不同步指标仍难以预测。散斑追踪应变分析的预测价值尚未完全明确。本研究的目的是评估纵向应变(LS)和径向应变(RS)散斑追踪测量对CRT的超声心动图和临床反应的预测价值。
共研究了138例连续接受CRT治疗的II-IV级功能性心力衰竭患者。在基线和随访期间进行超声心动图检查。使用LS和RS测量六个不同的基于时间的左心室(LV)不同步指标。CRT的超声心动图反应定义为左心室收缩末期容积减少≥15%,临床反应定义为无心力衰竭住院存活。进行多变量分析以调整潜在的混杂因素。
超声心动图和临床随访分别为22±8个月和42±8个月。96例患者(70%)被归类为超声心动图反应者,114例患者(83%)无心力衰竭住院存活。QRS时限和非缺血性病因可预测CRT的超声心动图反应。CRT的超声心动图反应者和无反应者之间的散斑追踪指标均无差异。关于临床反应,只有用LS测量的四腔视图中六个节段之间的最大延迟在反应者和无反应者之间存在差异,最佳截断值为154毫秒。窦性心律患者分层分析和多变量分析均未改变这些结果。
在所有基于时间测量的散斑追踪指标中,只有用LS评估的四腔视图中六个节段之间的最大延迟与CRT的临床反应相关。