Kumar G Anil, Jagadeesh A M, Singh Naveen G, Prasad S R
Department of Cardiac Anaesthesiology, Sri Jayadeva Institute of Cardiovascular Sciences and Research, Jayanagar, Bengaluru, Karnataka, India.
Indian J Anaesth. 2015 Jan;59(1):21-5. doi: 10.4103/0019-5049.149444.
Continuous arterial pressure monitoring is essential in cardiac surgical patients during induction of general anaesthesia (GA). Continuous non-invasive arterial pressure (CNAP) monitoring is fast gaining importance due to complications associated with the invasive arterial monitoring. Recently, a new continuous non-invasive arterial pressure device (CNAP™) has been validated perioperatively in non-cardiac surgeries. The aim of our study is to compare and assess the performance of CNAP during GA with invasive arterial pressure (IAP) in patients undergoing cardiac surgeries.
Sixty patients undergoing cardiac surgery were included. Systolic, diastolic, and mean arterial pressure (MAP) data were recorded every minute for 20 min simultaneously for both IAP and CNAP™. Statistical analysis was performed using mountain plot and Bland Altman plots for assessing limits of agreement and bias (accuracy) calculation. Totally 1200 pairs of data were analysed.
The CNAP™ systolic, diastolic and MAP bias was 5.98 mm Hg, -3.72 mm Hg, and - 0.02 mm Hg respectively. Percentage within limits of agreement was 96.0%, 95.2% and 95.7% for systolic, diastolic and MAP. The mountain plot showed similar results as the Bland Altman plots.
We conclude CNAP™ provides real-time estimates of arterial pressure comparable to IAP during induction of GA for cardiac surgery. We recommend CNAP can be used as an alternative to IAP in situations such as cardiac patients coming for non-cardiac surgeries, cardiac catheterization procedures, positive Allen's test, inability to cannulate radial artery and vascular diseases, where continuous blood pressure monitoring is required.
在全身麻醉诱导期间,对心脏手术患者进行连续动脉压监测至关重要。由于有创动脉监测存在并发症,连续无创动脉压(CNAP)监测的重要性正迅速提升。最近,一种新型连续无创动脉压设备(CNAP™)已在非心脏手术围手术期得到验证。我们研究的目的是比较和评估在心脏手术患者全身麻醉期间CNAP与有创动脉压(IAP)的性能。
纳入60例接受心脏手术的患者。同时记录IAP和CNAP™的收缩压、舒张压和平均动脉压(MAP)数据,每分钟记录一次,共记录20分钟。使用山形图和布兰德-奥特曼图进行统计分析,以评估一致性界限和偏差(准确性)计算。共分析了1200对数据。
CNAP™的收缩压、舒张压和MAP偏差分别为5.98 mmHg、-3.72 mmHg和-0.02 mmHg。收缩压、舒张压和MAP的一致性界限内百分比分别为96.0%、95.2%和95.7%。山形图显示的结果与布兰德-奥特曼图相似。
我们得出结论,在心脏手术全身麻醉诱导期间,CNAP™提供的动脉压实时估计值与IAP相当。我们建议,在诸如需要连续血压监测的非心脏手术患者、心脏导管插入术、艾伦试验阳性、无法穿刺桡动脉以及血管疾病等情况下,CNAP可作为IAP的替代方法使用。