• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

用于评估和监测急性胰腺炎的急性生理与慢性健康状况评分系统Ⅱ(APACHE-II评分)

APACHE-II score for assessment and monitoring of acute pancreatitis.

作者信息

Larvin M, McMahon M J

机构信息

University Department of Surgery, General Infirmary, Leeds.

出版信息

Lancet. 1989 Jul 22;2(8656):201-5. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(89)90381-4.

DOI:10.1016/s0140-6736(89)90381-4
PMID:2568529
Abstract

The value of the Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Enquiry (APACHE-II) score, the Simplified Acute Physiology score, and the Medical Research Council (MRC) sepsis score were compared with clinical assessment and Ranson and Imrie scores in the evaluation and monitoring of acute pancreatitis in 290 attacks. Attacks were graded mild (231) if uncomplicated, or severe (59) when major organ failure or a pancreatic collection occurred. Only APACHE-II scores were available at the time of admission; they correctly predicted outcome in 77% of attacks and identified 63% of severe attacks, compared with 44% achieved by clinical assessment. After 48 h, APACHE-II was most accurate, and correctly predicted outcome in 88% of attacks, compared with 69% for Ranson and 84% for Imrie scores. APACHE-II predicted 73% of pancreatic collections at 48 h, compared with 65% for Ranson and 58% for Imrie scores. In acute pancreatitis, APACHE-II may facilitate rapid selection of patients for intensive therapy or clinical trials, improve comparison between groups of patients, and indicate that a pancreatic collection is probable.

摘要

在对290例急性胰腺炎发作的评估和监测中,将急性生理与慢性健康状况评分系统(APACHE-II)评分、简化急性生理学评分以及医学研究委员会(MRC)脓毒症评分与临床评估、兰森评分和伊姆里评分进行了比较。若发作无并发症,则分级为轻度(231例);若出现主要器官衰竭或胰腺积液,则分级为重度(59例)。入院时仅可获得APACHE-II评分;其在77%的发作中正确预测了结局,识别出63%的重度发作,相比之下,临床评估的正确率为44%。48小时后,APACHE-II最为准确,在88%的发作中正确预测了结局,相比之下,兰森评分的正确率为69%,伊姆里评分为84%。APACHE-II在48小时时预测出73%的胰腺积液,相比之下,兰森评分为65%,伊姆里评分为58%。在急性胰腺炎中,APACHE-II可能有助于快速筛选出适合强化治疗或临床试验的患者,改善患者组间的比较,并提示可能存在胰腺积液。

相似文献

1
APACHE-II score for assessment and monitoring of acute pancreatitis.用于评估和监测急性胰腺炎的急性生理与慢性健康状况评分系统Ⅱ(APACHE-II评分)
Lancet. 1989 Jul 22;2(8656):201-5. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(89)90381-4.
2
Prognostic usefulness of scoring systems in critically ill patients with severe acute pancreatitis.评分系统对重症急性胰腺炎危重症患者的预后评估价值
Crit Care Med. 1999 May;27(5):901-7. doi: 10.1097/00003246-199905000-00023.
3
Improved prediction of outcome in patients with severe acute pancreatitis by the APACHE II score at 48 hours after hospital admission compared with the APACHE II score at admission. Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation.与入院时的急性生理与慢性健康状况评估(APACHE II)评分相比,入院48小时时的APACHE II评分能更好地预测重症急性胰腺炎患者的预后。急性生理与慢性健康状况评估。
Arch Surg. 2002 Oct;137(10):1136-40. doi: 10.1001/archsurg.137.10.1136.
4
Acute pancreatitis in intensive care unit patients: value of clinical and radiologic prognosticators at predicting clinical course and outcome.重症监护病房患者的急性胰腺炎:临床和影像学预后指标对预测临床病程及结局的价值
Crit Care Med. 2003 Apr;31(4):1026-30. doi: 10.1097/01.CCM.0000049951.77583.85.
5
Evaluation of severity in patients with acute pancreatitis.急性胰腺炎患者严重程度的评估。
Am J Gastroenterol. 1992 May;87(5):604-8.
6
Comparison of Ranson, APACHE II and APACHE III scoring systems in acute pancreatitis.兰森、急性生理学及慢性健康状况评分系统II(APACHE II)和急性生理学及慢性健康状况评分系统III(APACHE III)在急性胰腺炎中的比较。
Pancreas. 2002 Nov;25(4):331-5. doi: 10.1097/00006676-200211000-00002.
7
Comparison of modified Glasgow-Imrie, Ranson, and Apache II scoring systems in predicting the severity of acute pancreatitis.改良 Glasgow-Imrie、Ranson 和 Apache II 评分系统在预测急性胰腺炎严重程度中的比较。
Pol Przegl Chir. 2022 May 2;95(1):6-12. doi: 10.5604/01.3001.0015.8384.
8
Predictors of severity and survival in acute pancreatitis: validation of the efficacy of early warning scores.急性胰腺炎严重程度和生存率的预测因素:早期预警评分有效性的验证
Pancreas. 2008 Oct;37(3):e54-61. doi: 10.1097/MPA.0b013e3181771451.
9
A brief evaluation for pre-estimating the severity of gallstone pancreatitis.用于预先评估胆结石性胰腺炎严重程度的简要评估。
JOP. 2009 Mar 9;10(2):147-51.
10
[Prognosis of acute pancreatitis: Ranson or APACHE II?].[急性胰腺炎的预后:兰森标准还是急性生理与慢性健康状况评分系统II?]
Rev Esp Enferm Dig. 1995 Feb;87(2):121-6.

引用本文的文献

1
Clinical-CT mismatch in acute pancreatitis: a new concept and report of two cases.急性胰腺炎中的临床-CT不匹配:一个新概念及两例报告。
AME Case Rep. 2025 Jul 8;9:100. doi: 10.21037/acr-25-12. eCollection 2025.
2
Clinical impact of recombinant thrombomodulin administration on disseminated intravascular coagulation due to severe acute pancreatitis (Recover-AP study).重组血栓调节蛋白治疗对重症急性胰腺炎所致弥散性血管内凝血的临床影响(Recover-AP研究)
Therap Adv Gastroenterol. 2025 Jul 14;18:17562848251353626. doi: 10.1177/17562848251353626. eCollection 2025.
3
Comparative Study Between Various Scoring Systems in Predicting the Severity of Acute Pancreatitis.
多种评分系统在预测急性胰腺炎严重程度方面的比较研究
Cureus. 2025 May 13;17(5):e84004. doi: 10.7759/cureus.84004. eCollection 2025 May.
4
Risk factors of phlebitis in patients admitted to the intensive care unit vary according to the duration of catheter dwelling: A post-hoc analysis of the AMOR-VENUS study.重症监护病房患者静脉炎的危险因素因导管留置时间而异:AMOR-VENUS研究的事后分析
PLoS One. 2025 Apr 30;20(4):e0320583. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0320583. eCollection 2025.
5
Comparative Analysis of Laboratory Markers, Severity Scores, and Outcomes in 179 Patients with Severe Acute Pancreatitis.179例重症急性胰腺炎患者实验室指标、严重程度评分及预后的比较分析
Biomedicines. 2025 Mar 26;13(4):797. doi: 10.3390/biomedicines13040797.
6
Association Between the Systemic Inflammation Response Index and Severity of Acute Pancreatitis: A Retrospective Cohort Study.全身炎症反应指数与急性胰腺炎严重程度的相关性:一项回顾性队列研究。
J Inflamm Res. 2025 Mar 27;18:4471-4480. doi: 10.2147/JIR.S512553. eCollection 2025.
7
Improved outcome prediction in acute pancreatitis with generated data and advanced machine learning algorithms.利用生成数据和先进机器学习算法改善急性胰腺炎的预后预测
Turk J Emerg Med. 2025 Jan 2;25(1):32-40. doi: 10.4103/tjem.tjem_161_24. eCollection 2025 Jan-Mar.
8
Prediction Models of Severity in Acute Biliary Pancreatitis.急性胆源性胰腺炎严重程度的预测模型
Diagnostics (Basel). 2025 Jan 7;15(2):126. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics15020126.
9
Machine Learning-Guided Fluid Resuscitation for Acute Pancreatitis Improves Outcomes.机器学习指导下的急性胰腺炎液体复苏可改善预后。
Clin Transl Gastroenterol. 2025 Apr 1;16(4):e00825. doi: 10.14309/ctg.0000000000000825.
10
Natural History and Microbiological Profiles of Patients With Acute Pancreatitis With Suspected Infected Pancreatic Necrosis.疑似感染性胰腺坏死的急性胰腺炎患者的自然病史和微生物学特征
Cureus. 2024 Oct 19;16(10):e71853. doi: 10.7759/cureus.71853. eCollection 2024 Oct.