Deshpande Shrinath G, Litake Manjusha M
Surgical Gastroenterology, Bangalore Medical College and Research Institute, Bengaluru, IND.
General Surgery, Government Medical College & Hospital, Baramati, IND.
Cureus. 2025 May 13;17(5):e84004. doi: 10.7759/cureus.84004. eCollection 2025 May.
Background Acute pancreatitis (AP) is an acute inflammatory condition of the pancreas, peri-pancreatic tissues, and several organs, leading to multiple organ dysfunction syndrome and a higher risk of mortality. For many years, scoring systems that include biochemical, radiological, and clinical criteria for determining severity have been used. Though numerous studies have used various scoring methods to evaluate the severity of AP, this study has been conducted to compare four scoring systems: bedside index of severity in AP (BISAP), acute physiology and chronic health evaluation (APACHE II), Ranson's, and modified CT severity index (CTSI) based on clinical, biochemical, and radiological parameters. Materials and methods It was a prospective-comparative study. The study was conducted from December 2016 to August 2018 in the Department of General Surgery at Byramjee Jeejeebhoy Government Medical College (B.J.G.M.C.) and Sassoon Hospital, Pune, Maharashtra, India. A total of 75 participants were enrolled in the study. Results The study population ranged from 18 to 68 years, with a mean age of 40.8±11.5 years. AP was most prevalent in the age group of 31-40 years (33.3% cases). Out of 75 patients in this study, 14 patients (18.7%) had severe AP (SAP), 18 patients (24%) had moderate SAP, and 43 patients (57.3%) had mild AP. Ten patients expired, with a mortality rate of 13.3%. It has been observed that the BISAP score had the best specificity (100%) and the CTSI score had the highest sensitivity (96.9%) among our study's four scores for predicting pancreatic necrosis. When predicting persistent organ failure, BISAP had the highest specificity, and Ranson and CTSI scored the highest sensitivity. The modified CTSI poorly predicted AP, patients' mortality, and SAP. Conclusion The BISAP score provides a straightforward and accurate way to analyze the seriousness of AP. Ranson's score is also a reliable indicator of ongoing organ failure among AP cases. The most reliable technique for predicting pancreatitis mortality is the APACHE II score.
背景 急性胰腺炎(AP)是胰腺、胰腺周围组织以及多个器官的一种急性炎症性疾病,可导致多器官功能障碍综合征及更高的死亡风险。多年来,一直使用包含生化、放射学和临床标准来确定严重程度的评分系统。尽管众多研究已采用各种评分方法来评估AP的严重程度,但本研究旨在基于临床、生化和放射学参数比较四种评分系统:急性胰腺炎床边严重程度指数(BISAP)、急性生理与慢性健康状况评估(APACHE II)、兰森评分以及改良CT严重程度指数(CTSI)。
材料与方法 这是一项前瞻性比较研究。该研究于2016年12月至2018年8月在印度马哈拉施特拉邦浦那市拜拉姆吉·杰吉博伊政府医学院(B.J.G.M.C.)和萨松医院的普通外科进行。共有75名参与者纳入本研究。
结果 研究人群年龄在18至68岁之间,平均年龄为40.8±11.5岁。AP在31 - 40岁年龄组最为常见(占病例的33.3%)。本研究的75例患者中,14例(18.7%)为重症急性胰腺炎(SAP),18例(24%)为中度SAP,43例(57.3%)为轻症AP。10例患者死亡,死亡率为13.3%。据观察,在本研究预测胰腺坏死的四个评分中,BISAP评分具有最佳特异性(100%),CTSI评分具有最高敏感性(96.9%)。在预测持续性器官衰竭时,BISAP具有最高特异性,兰森评分和CTSI评分具有最高敏感性。改良CTSI对AP、患者死亡率和SAP的预测效果较差。
结论 BISAP评分提供了一种直接且准确的方法来分析AP的严重程度。兰森评分也是AP病例中持续器官衰竭的可靠指标。预测胰腺炎死亡率最可靠的技术是APACHE II评分。