Werler Martha M
Curr Epidemiol Rep. 2015 Mar;2(1):8-12. doi: 10.1007/s40471-014-0029-x.
A call for a shift in the discipline of epidemiology, away from those aimed at identifying risk factors and toward those aimed at more directly improving health - so called c. This call for epidemiologists to engage in solving the biggest public health problems has been heralded for decades by Cates and more recently by Galea [Am J Epidemiol 2013; 178; 1185-94]. In consideration of the consequential epidemiology perspective, the impacts of epidemiologic research of birth defects over the recent decades are evaluated and directions for the field are proposed. While many causal factors have been identified, the causes of the majority of birth defects remain unknown. Folic acid intake notwithstanding, primary prevention of birth defects is elusive. Meanwhile, research that identifies what improves the lives of individuals born with a birth defect and how to ensure those factors are available to all affected would have great impact. In summary, a consequentialist approach to birth defects epidemiology requires a shift in research agendas and teams, but the opportunities are wide open.
呼吁流行病学学科进行转变,从旨在识别风险因素的研究转向更直接致力于改善健康的研究——即所谓的“结果导向型流行病学”。几十年来,凯茨一直倡导流行病学家参与解决重大公共卫生问题,最近加利亚也发出了同样的呼吁[《美国流行病学杂志》2013年;178卷;1185 - 1194页]。从结果导向型流行病学的角度出发,评估了近几十年来出生缺陷流行病学研究的影响,并提出了该领域的发展方向。虽然已经确定了许多因果因素,但大多数出生缺陷的原因仍然未知。尽管叶酸摄入已得到重视,但出生缺陷的一级预防仍难以实现。与此同时,确定如何改善患有出生缺陷者的生活以及如何确保所有受影响者都能获得这些因素的研究将产生重大影响。总之,采用结果导向型方法进行出生缺陷流行病学研究需要研究议程和团队的转变,但机会十分广阔。