Michiels Jan Jacques, Michiels Janneke Maria, Moossdorff Wim, Lao Mildred, Maasland Hanny, Palareti Gualtiero
Jan Jacques Michiels, Wim Moossdorff, Mildred Lao, Hanny Maasland, Primary Care Medicine Medical Diagnostic Center, Vlambloem 21, 3068 JE Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
World J Crit Care Med. 2015 Feb 4;4(1):29-39. doi: 10.5492/wjccm.v4.i1.29.
The requirement for a safe diagnostic strategy of deep vein thrombosis (DVT) should be based on an overall objective post incidence of venous thromboembolism (VTE) of less than 1% during 3 mo follow-up. Compression ultrasonography (CUS) of the leg veins has a negative predictive value (NPV) of 97%-98% indicating the need of repeated CUS testing within one week. A negative ELISA VIDAS safely excludes DVT and VTE with a NPV between 99% and 100% at a low clinical score of zero. The combination of low clinical score and a less sensitive D-dimer test (Simplify) is not sensitive enough to exclude DVT and VTE in routine daily practice. From prospective clinical research studies it may be concluded that complete recanalization within 3 mo and no reflux is associated with a low or no risk of PTS obviating the need of MECS 6 mo after DVT. Partial and complete recanalization after 3 to more than 6 mo is usually complicated by reflux due to valve destruction and symptomatic PTS. Reflux seems to be a main determinant for PTS and DVT recurrence, the latter as a main contributing factor in worsening PTS. This hypothesis is supported by the relation between the persistent residual vein thrombosis (RVT = partial recanalization) and the risk of VTE recurrence in prospective studies. Absence of RVT at 3 mo post-DVT and no reflux is predicted to be associated with no recurrence of DVT (1.2%) during follow-up obviating the need of wearing medical elastic stockings and anticoagulation at 6 mo post-DVT. The presence or absence of RVT but with reflux at 3 to 6 mo post-DVT is associated with both symptomatic PTS and an increased risk of VTE recurrence in about one third in the post-DVT period after regular discontinuation of anticoagulant treatment. To test this hypothesis we designed a prospective DVT and postthrombotic syndrome (PTS) Bridging the Gap Study by addressing at least four unanswered questions in the treatment of DVT and PTS. Which DVT patient has a clear indication for long-term compression stocking therapy to prevent PTS after the initial anticoagulant treatment in the acute phase of DVT? Is 3 mo the appropriate point in time to determine candidates at risk to develop DVT recurrence and PTS? Which high risk symptomatic PTS patients need extended anticoagulant treatment?
安全的深静脉血栓形成(DVT)诊断策略要求应基于在3个月随访期间静脉血栓栓塞症(VTE)总体目标发病率低于1%。腿部静脉压迫超声检查(CUS)的阴性预测值(NPV)为97%-98%,这表明需要在一周内重复进行CUS检测。阴性ELISA VIDAS在临床评分为零的低分值时,能以99%至100%的NPV安全排除DVT和VTE。临床低评分与敏感性较低的D-二聚体检测(Simplify)相结合,在日常临床实践中不足以排除DVT和VTE。从前瞻性临床研究可以得出结论,3个月内完全再通且无反流与发生血栓后综合征(PTS)的低风险或无风险相关,从而无需在DVT后6个月进行MECS。3至6个月以上出现部分和完全再通通常会因瓣膜破坏和有症状的PTS而并发反流。反流似乎是PTS和DVT复发的主要决定因素,后者是PTS恶化的主要促成因素。这一假设得到了前瞻性研究中持续性残余静脉血栓形成(RVT = 部分再通)与VTE复发风险之间关系的支持。预计DVT后3个月无RVT且无反流与随访期间DVT无复发(1.2%)相关,从而无需在DVT后6个月穿戴医用弹力袜和进行抗凝治疗。DVT后3至6个月存在或不存在RVT但有反流,与有症状的PTS以及在常规停用抗凝治疗后的DVT后期约三分之一的VTE复发风险增加相关。为了验证这一假设,我们设计了一项前瞻性DVT和血栓后综合征(PTS)弥合差距研究,通过解决DVT和PTS治疗中至少四个未解决的问题。在DVT急性期初始抗凝治疗后,哪些DVT患者有明确的长期压迫袜治疗指征以预防PTS?3个月是否是确定有发生DVT复发和PTS风险的患者的合适时间点?哪些高危有症状的PTS患者需要延长抗凝治疗?