Li Junxun, Zhang Fan, Liang Chujia, Ye Zhuangjian, Chen Shaoqian, Cheng Jing
1 Department of Medical Laboratory, The First Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, Guangdong Province, People's Republic of China.
Junxun Li and Fan Zhang contributed equally to this study and should be considered as co-first author.
Clin Appl Thromb Hemost. 2019 Jan-Dec;25:1076029619826317. doi: 10.1177/1076029619826317.
This study seeks to evaluate the diagnostic value of D-Dimer Plus and Innovance D-Dimer as well as the age-adjusted cutoff value for D-dimer detection in combination with 4 pretest probability (PTP) scores for deep venous thrombosis (DVT). A total of 688 patients referred for lower extremity vascular compression venous ultrasonography for suspected DVT from January 2016 to May 2018 in the First Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University underwent D-dimer tests combining with 4 PTP scores. The diagnostic efficacy of the Wells score was the highest of the 4 PTP scores. The diagnostic efficacy of Innovance D-Dimer for DVT was greater than that of D-Dimer Plus, with better sensitivity and negative predictive value, which were both greater than 98%. If the cutoff values were adjusted by age, the Innovation D-Dimer could further improve both the specificity and the positive predictive value, providing better diagnostic performance. When the 2 D-dimer detections were used in combination with 4 PTP scores for DVT diagnosis, separately, both the positive predictive value and the negative predictive value significantly improved for D-Dimer Plus, and the positive predictive values significantly improved for Innovance D-Dimer. However, the sensitivity, specificity, and negative predictive values did not obviously change. For our patients, Wells score had the best diagnostic efficacy for our patients with suspected DVT among the 4 PTP scores. Innovance D-Dimer in combination with age-adjusted cutoff values exhibited increased sensitivity and negative predictive value for DVT diagnosis and was equivalent to the diagnostic efficacy of the Innovance D-Dimer in combination with PTP scores.
本研究旨在评估D -二聚体Plus和Innovance D -二聚体的诊断价值,以及结合4种深静脉血栓形成(DVT)的检测前概率(PTP)评分的D -二聚体检测的年龄校正临界值。2016年1月至2018年5月期间,中山大学附属第一医院共有688例因疑似DVT而接受下肢血管压迫静脉超声检查的患者接受了D -二聚体检测,并结合4种PTP评分。Wells评分在4种PTP评分中诊断效能最高。Innovance D -二聚体对DVT的诊断效能高于D -二聚体Plus,其敏感性和阴性预测值更好,均大于98%。如果根据年龄调整临界值,Innovance D -二聚体可进一步提高特异性和阳性预测值,提供更好的诊断性能。当将这2种D -二聚体检测分别与4种DVT诊断的PTP评分结合使用时,D -二聚体Plus的阳性预测值和阴性预测值均显著提高,Innovance D -二聚体的阳性预测值显著提高。然而,敏感性、特异性和阴性预测值没有明显变化。对于我们的患者,在4种PTP评分中,Wells评分对疑似DVT患者的诊断效能最佳。Innovance D -二聚体结合年龄校正临界值在DVT诊断中表现出更高的敏感性和阴性预测值,且等同于Innovance D -二聚体结合PTP评分的诊断效能。