Patel Alpen B, Cain Rachel B, Lal Devyani
Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Phoenix, Arizona, U.S.A.
Laryngoscope. 2015 Sep;125(9):2046-53. doi: 10.1002/lary.25206. Epub 2015 Feb 17.
Our objective was to perform a systematic review of the literature on contemporary indications and outcomes for frontal sinus trephination and present an illustrative case of an endoscopically assisted repair of a subcutaneous frontal sinus fistula by trephination technique. PubMed and Ovid databases were used as data sources. A systematic review of the English literature was completed to review reports of frontal trephination from 1980 to 2014. Articles meeting inclusion criteria for inflammatory and noninflammatory indications were reviewed. Articles were systematically reviewed and graded by evidence-based medicine level. An illustrative case from our institution is then presented. The systematic review identified 2,621 published studies. Thirty-eight studies were identified for inclusion. The indications, techniques, outcomes, safety, and complications were reviewed for noninflammatory and inflammatory conditions. There were 32 retrospective case series, reports, or cohort studies (level 4), four systematic reviews (level 3), one prospective analysis (level 3), and one meta-analysis (level 2). Due to the heterogeneity of study cases and inclusion criteria, a meta-analysis was not feasible. We also present a novel closure of an anterior skull base defect resulting in a subcutaneous fistula with use of a frontal trephination approach. The frontal sinus trephination should not be regarded as a procedure of the past, as it useful in the armamentarium of the modern sinus and skull base surgeon. This approach provides access for instrumentation for hard-to-reach frontal sinus disease either purely through a trephination approach or as a supplementation to the transnasal endoscopic approach. Evidence supporting frontal sinus trephination is of levels 2, 3, and 4. Level of evidence: NA.
我们的目的是对有关当代额窦环钻术的适应症和治疗结果的文献进行系统综述,并通过环钻术技术展示一例内镜辅助修复皮下额窦瘘的病例。使用PubMed和Ovid数据库作为数据源。完成了对英文文献的系统综述,以回顾1980年至2014年额窦环钻术的报告。对符合炎性和非炎性适应症纳入标准的文章进行了综述。文章通过循证医学水平进行系统综述和分级。然后展示了我们机构的一个典型病例。系统综述共识别出2621项已发表研究。确定了38项研究纳入。对非炎性和炎性疾病的适应症、技术、治疗结果、安全性和并发症进行了综述。有32项回顾性病例系列、报告或队列研究(4级)、4项系统综述(3级)、1项前瞻性分析(3级)和1项荟萃分析(2级)。由于研究病例和纳入标准的异质性,荟萃分析不可行。我们还展示了一种新颖的利用额窦环钻术方法闭合导致皮下瘘的前颅底缺损的方法。额窦环钻术不应被视为过去的一种手术方法,因为它在现代鼻窦和颅底外科医生的手术器械库中是有用的。这种方法为治疗难以触及的额窦疾病提供了器械操作通道,既可以单纯通过环钻术方法,也可以作为经鼻内镜方法的补充。支持额窦环钻术的证据等级为2级、3级和4级。证据等级:无。