Lim Daniel, Condon Paul, DeSteno David
Department of Psychology, Northeastern University, Boston, Massachusetts, United States of America.
PLoS One. 2015 Feb 17;10(2):e0118221. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0118221. eCollection 2015.
Emerging evidence suggests that meditation engenders prosocial behaviors meant to benefit others. However, the robustness, underlying mechanisms, and potential scalability of such effects remain open to question. The current experiment employed an ecologically valid situation that exposed participants to a person in visible pain. Following three-week, mobile-app based training courses in mindfulness meditation or cognitive skills (i.e., an active control condition), participants arrived at a lab individually to complete purported measures of cognitive ability. Upon entering a public waiting area outside the lab that contained three chairs, participants seated themselves in the last remaining unoccupied chair; confederates occupied the other two. As the participant sat and waited, a third confederate using crutches and a large walking boot entered the waiting area while displaying discomfort. Compassionate responding was assessed by whether participants gave up their seat to allow the uncomfortable confederate to sit, thereby relieving her pain. Participants' levels of empathic accuracy was also assessed. As predicted, participants assigned to the mindfulness meditation condition gave up their seats more frequently than did those assigned to the active control group. In addition, empathic accuracy was not increased by mindfulness practice, suggesting that mindfulness-enhanced compassionate behavior does not stem from associated increases in the ability to decode the emotional experiences of others.
新出现的证据表明,冥想会产生旨在造福他人的亲社会行为。然而,这种影响的稳健性、潜在机制和可扩展性仍有待质疑。当前的实验采用了一种生态效度较高的情境,让参与者接触到一个明显处于痛苦中的人。在进行了为期三周的基于移动应用程序的正念冥想或认知技能培训课程(即积极对照条件)后,参与者分别来到实验室完成所谓的认知能力测试。进入实验室外的公共等候区(那里有三把椅子)后,参与者坐在最后一把空着的椅子上;同谋占据了另外两把椅子。当参与者坐着等待时,另一名使用拐杖和大型步行靴的同谋一瘸一拐地走进等候区,同时表现出不适。通过参与者是否让座给这位不舒服的同谋以减轻她的痛苦来评估同情反应。还评估了参与者的共情准确性水平。正如预期的那样,被分配到正念冥想组的参与者比被分配到积极对照组的参与者更频繁地让座。此外,正念练习并没有提高共情准确性,这表明正念增强的同情行为并非源于解码他人情绪体验能力的相应提高。