Suppr超能文献

[前列腺癌的聚焦治疗:德文版]

[Focal therapy for prostate cancer: German version].

作者信息

Kasivisvanathan V, Shah T T, Donaldson I, Kanthabalan A, Moore C M, Emberton M, Ahmed H U

机构信息

Division of Surgery and Interventional Sciences, University College London, 4th Floor, Room 4.23, 132 Hampstead Road, NW1 2PS, London, UK,

出版信息

Urologe A. 2015 Feb;54(2):202-9. doi: 10.1007/s00120-014-3668-0.

Abstract

Focal therapy is a treatment strategy for men with localized prostate cancer that may serve as an alternative option to radical therapy. A number of minimally invasive ablative technologies are available to deliver treatment, and the energies most commonly used include high-intensity focused ultrasound and cryotherapy. The benefit of a tissue-preserving approach is the limitation of damage to key structures such as the neurovascular bundles, external urinary sphincter, rectal mucosa and bladder neck. This in turn minimizes side effects typically associated with radical therapies whilst also aiming to maintain oncological control. Over 30 single-centre studies of focal therapy have been published to date reporting excellent continence rates, good potency rates and acceptable short-term oncological outcomes. However, there are a number of controversial aspects associated with focal therapy including the index lesion hypothesis, patient selection criteria, assessment of treatment effect and the lack of medium- and long-term oncological outcomes. In the process of the adoption of new technology, there is a limited window of opportunity to provide this evidence in well-designed prospective trials. Men should be allowed to benefit from the potential advantages of this novel treatment whilst under close surveillance. An English version of this article is available under dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00120-014-3734-7.

摘要

聚焦治疗是针对局限性前列腺癌男性患者的一种治疗策略,可作为根治性治疗的替代选择。有多种微创消融技术可用于实施治疗,最常用的能量包括高强度聚焦超声和冷冻疗法。保留组织方法的益处在于限制对神经血管束、外括约肌、直肠黏膜和膀胱颈等关键结构的损伤。这进而将通常与根治性治疗相关的副作用降至最低,同时也旨在维持肿瘤学控制。迄今为止,已发表了30多项关于聚焦治疗的单中心研究,报告显示控尿率良好、性功能良好率良好且短期肿瘤学结果可接受。然而,聚焦治疗存在一些争议性方面,包括索引病灶假说、患者选择标准、治疗效果评估以及缺乏中长期肿瘤学结果。在采用新技术的过程中,在精心设计的前瞻性试验中提供此类证据的机会窗口有限。应允许男性在密切监测下从这种新型治疗的潜在优势中获益。本文的英文版本可在dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00120-014-3734-7获取。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验