Smeds Karolina, Wolters Florian, Rung Martin
ORCA Europe, Widex A/S, Stockholm, Sweden.
Widex A/S, Lynge, Denmark.
J Am Acad Audiol. 2015 Feb;26(2):183-96. doi: 10.3766/jaaa.26.2.7.
Both in the design of hearing-device features, such as noise reduction, and in the evaluation measurements of such features, there is a need for more information about the sound scenarios hearing-device users encounter. The limitations of adaptive speech tests as outcome measures in the evaluation of hearing-device features have been discussed. The obvious alternative to adaptive speech testing is to test at a fixed signal-to-noise ratio (SNR). However, the question is which SNRs should be used if the test reflects real-life situations.
The purpose of this study was to estimate SNRs in realistic sound environments encountered by hearing aid users.
Research design was a descriptive study where recorded sound files were statistically analyzed.
A total of 20 experienced, bilaterally fitted hearing aid users, all satisfied with their current hearing aids, made recordings for 3-4 days. The informants were instructed to record different situations in daily life and were told that all situations were of equal importance. The informants ranged in age from 18-81 yr old, and they had various occupations and varying hearing-loss configurations.
The total duration of the recorded material for each informant was, on average, 84 min; the number of recordings was, on average, 17 per informant. The sound files were categorized based on the type of background noise and were analyzed with use of a manual noise estimation procedure. Segments of speech with noise present were cut out from the original recordings. Corresponding noise-only segments were also extracted. On the basis of power calculations for these two types of recorded segments, the SNR was estimated. Frequency-specific and overall SNRs, calculated both based on unweighted and A-weighted speech and noise levels, were derived. An estimation uncertainty measure was also developed.
The range of SNRs found in the material was large. The most striking finding was that there were very few recorded situations where the SNR was negative or even close to 0 dB. For speech-in-babble noise, the average SNR was approximately 5 dB. The estimation uncertainty was generally low but became higher in highly fluctuating noises and at very low SNRs.
The estimated SNRs were higher than previously reported. The results can be used in the design and evaluation of hearing-device features.
无论是在诸如降噪等听力设备功能的设计中,还是在对此类功能的评估测量中,都需要更多关于听力设备使用者所遇到的声音场景的信息。自适应言语测试作为听力设备功能评估的结果指标的局限性已被讨论过。自适应言语测试的明显替代方法是在固定的信噪比(SNR)下进行测试。然而,如果测试要反映现实生活情况,问题是应该使用哪些信噪比。
本研究的目的是估计助听器使用者在现实声音环境中的信噪比。
研究设计是一项描述性研究,对录制的声音文件进行统计分析。
共有20名经验丰富的双侧佩戴助听器的使用者,他们都对自己当前的助听器满意,进行了3 - 4天的录音。告知参与者记录日常生活中的不同情况,并告知他们所有情况都同等重要。参与者年龄在18 - 81岁之间,有不同的职业和不同的听力损失类型。
每个参与者录制材料的总时长平均为84分钟;每个参与者的录音数量平均为17个。声音文件根据背景噪声类型进行分类,并使用手动噪声估计程序进行分析。从原始录音中切出有噪声存在的语音片段。还提取了相应的仅噪声片段。基于这两种录制片段的功率计算,估计信噪比。得出了基于未加权和A加权语音及噪声水平计算的特定频率和总体信噪比。还开发了一种估计不确定度测量方法。
材料中发现的信噪比范围很大。最显著的发现是,记录的情况中很少有信噪比为负甚至接近0 dB的。对于嘈杂环境中的语音,平均信噪比约为5 dB。估计不确定度一般较低,但在高度波动的噪声和非常低的信噪比情况下会变高。
估计的信噪比高于先前报告的结果。这些结果可用于听力设备功能的设计和评估。