Department of Integrative Biology and Evolution, Konrad Lorenz Institute of Ethology, University of Veterinary Medicine Vienna, Austria.
Institute of Zoology, Slovak Academy of Sciences Bratislava, Slovakia.
Ecol Evol. 2015 Jan;5(2):450-8. doi: 10.1002/ece3.1355. Epub 2015 Jan 2.
Food availability is generally considered to determine breeding site selection and therefore plays an important role in hypotheses explaining the evolution of colony formation. Hypotheses trying to explain why birds join a colony usually assume that food is not limited, whereas those explaining variation in colony size suggest that food is under constraint. In this study, we investigate the composition and amount of food items not eaten by the nestlings and found in nest burrows of colonially nesting European bee-eaters (Merops apiaster). We aimed to determine whether this unconsumed food is an indicator of unlimited food supply, the result of mistakes during food transfer between parents and chicks or foraging selectivity of chicks. Therefore, we investigated the amount of dropped food for each nest in relation to reproductive performance and parameters reflecting parental quality. Our data suggest that parents carry more food to the nest than chicks can eat and, hence, food is not limited. This assumption is supported by the facts that there is a positive relationship between dropped food found in a nest and the number of fledglings, nestling age, and chick health condition and that the amount of dropped food is independent of colony size. There is variation in the amount of dropped food within colonies, suggesting that parent foraging efficiency may also be an important determinant. Pairs nesting in the center of a colony performed better than those nesting on the edge, which supports the assumption that quality differences between parents are important as well. However, dropped food cannot be used as an indicator of local food availability as (1) within-colony variation in dropped food is larger than between colony variation and, (2) the average amount of dropped food is not related to colony size.
食物的可获得性通常被认为决定了繁殖地的选择,因此在解释群体形成进化的假说中起着重要作用。试图解释鸟类为何加入群体的假说通常假设食物不受限制,而那些解释群体大小变化的假说则表明食物受到限制。在这项研究中,我们调查了巢内雏鸟未食用但在群体筑巢的欧洲食蜂鸟(Merops apiaster)巢洞中发现的食物的组成和数量。我们旨在确定这些未食用的食物是否是食物供应不受限制的指标,是父母与雏鸟之间食物传递过程中出现错误的结果,还是雏鸟觅食选择性的结果。因此,我们调查了每个巢中掉落食物的数量与繁殖性能以及反映亲鸟质量的参数之间的关系。我们的数据表明,亲鸟携带的食物比雏鸟能吃的还要多,因此食物不受限制。这一假设得到了以下事实的支持:在巢中发现的掉落食物与育雏数量、雏鸟年龄和雏鸟健康状况呈正相关,并且掉落食物的数量与群体大小无关。群体内部掉落食物的数量存在差异,这表明亲鸟觅食效率也可能是一个重要的决定因素。在群体中心筑巢的对鸟比在边缘筑巢的对鸟表现更好,这支持了亲鸟质量差异也很重要的假设。然而,掉落食物不能作为当地食物可获得性的指标,因为(1)群体内部掉落食物的差异大于群体之间的差异,(2)掉落食物的平均数量与群体大小无关。