Suppr超能文献

外科培训期间严格的选择标准确保了腹腔镜网膜补片修补术(LOPR)治疗消化性溃疡穿孔(PPU)的良好效果。

Strict Selection Criteria During Surgical Training Ensures Good Outcomes in Laparoscopic Omental Patch Repair (LOPR) for Perforated Peptic Ulcer (PPU).

作者信息

Shelat Vishal G, Ahmed Saleem, Chia Clement L K, Cheah Yee Lee

机构信息

Department of General Surgery, Khoo Teck Puat Hospital, 90 Yishun Central, Singapore.

出版信息

Int Surg. 2015 Feb;100(2):370-5. doi: 10.9738/INTSURG-D-13-00241.1.

Abstract

Application of minimal access surgery in acute care surgery is limited due to various reasons. Laparoscopic omental patch repair (LOPR) for perforated peptic ulcer (PPU) surgery is safe and feasible but not widely implemented. We report our early experience of LOPR with emphasis on strict selection criteria. This is a descriptive study of all patients operated on for PPU at academic university-affiliated institutes from December 2010 to February 2012. All the patients who were operated on for LOPR were included as the study population and their records were studied. Perioperative outcomes, Boey score, Mannheim Peritonitis Index (MPI), and physiologic and operative severity scores for enumeration of mortality and morbidity (POSSUM) scores were calculated. All the data were tabulated in a Microsoft Excel spreadsheet and analyzed using Stata Version 8.x. (StataCorp, College Station, TX, USA). Fourteen patients had LOPR out of a total of 45 patients operated for the PPU. Mean age was 46 years (range 22-87 years). Twelve patients (86%) had a Boey score of 0 and all patients had MPI < 21 (mean MPI = 14). The predicted POSSUM morbidity and mortality were 36% and 7%, respectively. Mean ulcer size was 5 mm (range 2-10 mm), mean operating time was 100 minutes (range 70-123 minutes) and mean length of hospital stay was 4 days (range 3-6 days). There was no morbidity or mortality pertaining to LOPR. LOPR should be offered by acute care surgical teams when local expertise is available. This can optimize patient outcomes when strict selection criteria are applied.

摘要

由于各种原因,微创手术在急性护理手术中的应用受到限制。腹腔镜网膜补片修补术(LOPR)用于治疗消化性溃疡穿孔(PPU)手术是安全可行的,但尚未广泛实施。我们报告了我们在LOPR方面的早期经验,重点是严格的选择标准。这是一项对2010年12月至2012年2月在大学附属医院接受PPU手术的所有患者的描述性研究。所有接受LOPR手术的患者均纳入研究人群,并对其记录进行研究。计算围手术期结果、Boey评分、曼海姆腹膜炎指数(MPI)以及用于计算死亡率和发病率的生理和手术严重程度评分(POSSUM)。所有数据都列在Microsoft Excel电子表格中,并使用Stata 8.x版本(美国德克萨斯州大学城的StataCorp公司)进行分析。在总共45例接受PPU手术的患者中,有14例接受了LOPR。平均年龄为46岁(范围22 - 87岁)。12例患者(86%)的Boey评分为0,所有患者的MPI均<21(平均MPI = 14)。预测的POSSUM发病率和死亡率分别为36%和7%。平均溃疡大小为5毫米(范围2 - 10毫米),平均手术时间为100分钟(范围70 - 123分钟),平均住院时间为4天(范围3 - 6天)。没有与LOPR相关的发病率或死亡率。当具备当地专业知识时,急性护理手术团队应提供LOPR。当应用严格的选择标准时,这可以优化患者的治疗结果。

相似文献

2
A systematic review and meta-analysis comparing postoperative outcomes of laparoscopic versus open omental patch repair of perforated peptic ulcer.
J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2023 Jan 1;94(1):e1-e13. doi: 10.1097/TA.0000000000003799. Epub 2022 Oct 17.
5
Laparoscopic repair of perforated peptic ulcer: single-center results.
Surg Endosc. 2014 Aug;28(8):2302-8. doi: 10.1007/s00464-014-3481-2. Epub 2014 Mar 8.
7
Laparoscopic versus open operation for perforated peptic ulcer in pediatric patients: A 10-year experience.
J Pediatr Surg. 2015 Dec;50(12):2038-40. doi: 10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2015.08.025. Epub 2015 Aug 28.
8
Laparoscopic Repair for Perforated Peptic Ulcer in Children.
Eur J Pediatr Surg. 2017 Jun;27(3):251-254. doi: 10.1055/s-0036-1586201. Epub 2016 Jul 25.
9
Outcomes of omental patch repair in large or giant perforated peptic ulcer are comparable to gastrectomy.
Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg. 2021 Dec;47(6):1745-1752. doi: 10.1007/s00068-019-01237-8. Epub 2019 Oct 14.
10
Laparoscopic repair of perforated peptic ulcer: patch versus simple closure.
Int J Surg. 2013;11(9):948-51. doi: 10.1016/j.ijsu.2013.06.014. Epub 2013 Jun 24.

引用本文的文献

2
Omental patch repair of large perforated peptic ulcers ≥25 mm is associated with higher leak rate.
J Clin Transl Res. 2021 Nov 29;7(6):759-766. eCollection 2021 Dec 28.
4
An Overview of Gastroduodenal Perforation.
Front Surg. 2020 Nov 9;7:573901. doi: 10.3389/fsurg.2020.573901. eCollection 2020.
6
Perforated peptic ulcer - an update.
World J Gastrointest Surg. 2017 Jan 27;9(1):1-12. doi: 10.4240/wjgs.v9.i1.1.
8
Marginal ulcer perforation: a single center experience.
Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg. 2017 Oct;43(5):717-722. doi: 10.1007/s00068-016-0723-0. Epub 2016 Sep 12.

本文引用的文献

2
Perforated peptic ulcer: how to improve outcome?
Scand J Gastroenterol. 2009;44(1):15-22. doi: 10.1080/00365520802307997.
3
Surviving Sepsis Campaign: international guidelines for management of severe sepsis and septic shock: 2008.
Crit Care Med. 2008 Jan;36(1):296-327. doi: 10.1097/01.CCM.0000298158.12101.41.
4
Laparoscopic repair for perforated peptic ulcer disease.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2005 Oct 19(4):CD004778. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD004778.pub2.
5
Laparoscopic repair of perforated peptic ulcer: a meta-analysis.
Surg Endosc. 2004 Jul;18(7):1013-21. doi: 10.1007/s00464-003-8266-y. Epub 2004 May 12.
6
Routine use of laparoscopic repair for perforated peptic ulcer.
Br J Surg. 2004 Apr;91(4):481-4. doi: 10.1002/bjs.4452.
8
The use of laparoscopy in abdominal emergencies.
Surg Endosc. 2003 Jul;17(7):1118-24. doi: 10.1007/s00464-002-9114-1. Epub 2003 May 6.
9
Laparoscopic repair for perforated peptic ulcer: a randomized controlled trial.
Ann Surg. 2002 Mar;235(3):313-9. doi: 10.1097/00000658-200203000-00001.
10
Selection of patients for laparoscopic repair of perforated peptic ulcer.
Br J Surg. 2001 Jan;88(1):133-6. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2168.2001.01642.x.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验